Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anthropogenic impact on Andaman coast monitoring with benthic foraminifera, Andaman Sea, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of anthropogenic impact is extremely important to be considered while analysing the ecology of coast and shelf zones. For centuries, these zones have been the epicentres for various human activities, including urbanisation, construction of sea ports and harbours, development of natural reservoirs (including oil production and fishing), marine aquaculture, shipping, recreation and many others. Many of the activities in progress on both sides of the shoreline provide 50% or more of the gross State/UT (Union Tertiary) product for surrounding states. The data shows that land-based and atmospheric sources account for about two-thirds of the total contamination found in the marine environment, constituting 44 and 33%, respectively. The greatest anthropogenic pollution pressure undoubtedly falls on the shelf zones and coastal areas. To prove this theory, a total of 25 bottom sediment samples were collected within the depth zone of 5 fathoms from the South Andaman coastal fringe for sediment geochemistry studies and foraminiferal analysis. The samples were further analysed for heavy metal pollutants like Co, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn. The study yielded 20 benthic foraminiferal species. Of these, five benthic species were living including Ammonia beccarii, Calcarine calcar, Elphidium crispum, Operculina complanata and Nonion deppresula. The presence of deformed specimens and the domination of Ammonia spp. are indications of a polluted environment. Sampled coral reefs had high abundances of Operculina spp. The highest counts of benthic microbiota were found in finer sediment. Species diversity is very limited along the coastal fringe of South Andaman Island in comparison with fauna from the coast of India. This first report of benthic foraminifera from South Andaman Island will allow us to assess future impacts of marine pollution because foraminiferal deformations are positively correlated to the concentrations of heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Mn, Pb and Zn).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alve E (1995) Benthic foraminiferal response to estuarine pollution: a review. J Foraminiferal Res 25:190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball V (1870) Notes on the geology of the vicinity of Port Blair. J Asia Soc Bengal 39:231

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadyaya S, Subramanyam MR, Sharma PN (1973) The geology and mineral resources of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Geol Surv India 105(2):25–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltovskoy E, Wright R (1976) Recent foraminifera. Dr. B. V. Junk Publisher, The Hague, p 515

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzas-Stephens Martin, Buzas A (2005) Population dynamics and dissolution of foraminifera in Nucces Bay, Texas. J Foraminiferal Res 35:248–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culver SJ, Buzas MA (1995) The effects of anthropogenic habitat disturbance, habitat destruction and a global warming on shallow marine benthic foraminifera. J Foramin Res 25:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debenay JP, Tsakiridis E, Soulardc R, Grossel H (2001) Factors determining the distribution of foraminiferal assemblages in Port Joinville Harbor (Ile d’Yeu, France): the influence of pollution. Mar Micropaleontol 43(1–2):75–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraju N, Reddi KR (1996) Effect of river discharge on the test morphology of benthic foraminifera, South east coast of India. J Geol Soc India 50:435–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraju N, Raja Reddy BCS, Reddy KR (2008) The response of benthic foraminifera to various pollution sources: a study from Nellore coast, East Coast of India. Environ Monit Assess 142:319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karunakaran C, Pawde MB, Raina VK, Ray KK, Saha SS (1964) Geology of South Andaman Island. Proc. XXII Inter. Geol. Congr. India. Sec 11, part XI

  • Loeblich AR, Tappan H (1987) Foraminiferal genera and their classification. Van Nostrand Rinhold Camp, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet FR (1884) On the mineral resources of the Andaman Island in the neighbourhood of Port Blair. Rec Geol Surv India 17:79

    Google Scholar 

  • Morvan J, Debenay JP, Jorissen F, Redois F, Beneteau E, Delplancke M, Amato A-S (2006) Paatchiness and life cycle of intertribal foraminifera: implication for environmental and paleoenvironmental interpretation. J Mar Micropaleontol 61:131–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JW (1991) Ecology and Paleoecology of benthic foraminifera. Wiley, UK, p 397

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam R (1993) Foraminifera and changing pattern of monsoon rainfall. Curr Sci 64:935–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam R, Chaturvedi SK (2000) Foraminiferal study from Kharo creek, Kachchh (Gujarat), North West Coast of India. Indian J Mar Sci 29(6):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam R, Khare N (1994) Signals of change in monsoonal precipitation at around 2000 year BP in a sediment core off central west coast of India. Curr Sci 66:226–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Nigam R, Khare N, Nair RR (1995) Foraminiferal evidence of 77 year cyclicity of drought in India and its possible modulation by Gleissberg solar cycle. J Coast Res 11:1099–1107

    Google Scholar 

  • Panchang R, Nigam R, Baig N, Nayak GN (2005) A foraminiferal testimony for the reduced adverse effects of mining in Zuari Estuary, Goa. Int J Environ stud 62:579–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phleger FB (1956) Significance of living foraminiferal populations along the central Texas Coast. Contri Cushman Foram Res 7:106–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano E, Bergamin L, Finoia MG, Carbone MG, Ausili A, Gabellini M (2008) Industrial pollution at Bagnoli (Naples, Italy): benthic foraminifera as a tool in integrated programs of environmental characterisation. Mar Pollut Bull 56:439–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz F, Gonzalez-Regalado ML, Borrego J, Abad M, Pendon JG (2004) Ostracoda and foraminifera as short-term tracers of environmental changes in very polluted areas: the Odiel Estuary (SW Spain). J Environ Pollut 129:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samir AM (2000) The response of benthic Foraminifera and Ostracods to various pollution sources: a study from two lagoons in Egypt. J Formaminiferal Res 30(2):83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severin KP (1983) Test morphology of benthic foraminifera as a discriminator of biofacies. J Mar Micropaleontol 8:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan MS (1988) Late Cenozoic sequences of Andaman–Nicobar Islands, their regional significance and correlation. Indian J Geol 3:11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Szarek R, Kuhnt W, Kawamura H, Kitazo H (2006) Distribution of recent benthic foraminifera on the Sunda Shelf (South China Sea). J Mar Micropaleontol 61:171–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewari BS, Srinivastava RP (1967) On some fossil Bryozoa from India. J Geol Soc India 8:18–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton WR (1952) Techniques for recognition of living foraminifera; Cushman Found. J Foramin Res 3:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JM (1974) Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment. Science 183:1049–1052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • XLSTAT (2010) Data analysis and statistical solution

  • Yanko V, Arnold AJ, Parker WC (1999) Effects of marine pollution on benthic foraminifera. In: Sen Gupta BK (ed) Modern foraminifera. Kluwer, MA, pp 217–235

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

NJR thanks Prof. A. R. Reddy, Vice-chancellor, Yogi Vemana University, Kadapa. Dr. A. N. Reddy, Chief Geologist, ONGC, Madras, India, is thanked for his encouragement to carryout this work. Prof. Raymond L. Kepner, and Amy Lang, USA, revised the English throughout the manuscript and also made valuable comments. The UGC provided the financial assistance to NJR in the form of Research Associateship. Finally many thanks to anonymous reviewers for insightful comments on the earlier version to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Jayaraju.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jayaraju, N., Sundara Raja Reddy, B.C. & Reddy, K.R. Anthropogenic impact on Andaman coast monitoring with benthic foraminifera, Andaman Sea, India. Environ Earth Sci 62, 821–829 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0569-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0569-4

Keywords

Navigation