Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1435–1447 | Cite as

Integrated geophysical and geochemical study on AMD generation at the Haveri Au–Cu mine tailings, SW Finland

  • Edmundo Placencia-GómezEmail author
  • Annika Parviainen
  • Tero Hokkanen
  • Kirsti Loukola-Ruskeeniemi
Original Article

Abstract

The Haveri tailings area contains 1.5 Mt of sulfide-bearing waste from the Au–Cu mine that operated during 1942–1961. Geophysical and geochemical methods were used to evaluate and characterize the generation of acid mine drainage (AMD). Correlations were examined among the electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) data, the total sulfide content and concentrations of sulfide-bound metals (Cu, Co, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) of tailings samples, and the resistivity and geochemistry of surface water. The resulting geophysical–geochemical model defines an area in the vadose tailings, where a low resistivity anomaly (<10 Ohm m) is correlated with the highest sulfide content, extensive sulfide oxidation and low pH (average 3.1). The physical and geochemical conditions, resulting from the oxidation of the sulfide minerals, suggest that the low resistivity anomaly is associated with acidic and metal-rich porewater (i.e., AMD). The lower resistivity values in the saturated zone of the central impoundment suggest the formation of a plume of AMD. The natural subsoil layer (silt and clay) and the bedrock surface below the tailings area were well mapped from the ERT data. The detected fracture zones of the bedrock that could work as leakage pathways for AMD were consistent with previous geological studies. The integrated methodology of the study offers a promising approach to fast and reliable monitoring of areas of potential AMD generation and its subsurface movement over large areas (ca. 9 ha). This methodology could be helpful in planning drill core sampling locations for geochemical and mineralogical analysis, groundwater sampling, and choosing and monitoring remedial programs.

Keywords

Tailings Acid mine drainage Sulfide oxidation Electrical resistivity Haveri Finland 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Janne Kaukolinna (Geoenvironmental Technology Research Group, Helsinki University of Technology) for his valuable assistance in the geophysical field work. We are grateful to Prof. Vladimir Shevnin and Dr. A. A. Bobachev from Moscow State University for providing the IPI2Win and X2IPI software. This study was supported by the National Council on Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) (Placencia-Gómez E) and by the Finnish Graduate School in Geology (Parviainen A), and the experimental work was funded under the RAMAS project of the EU Life ENVIRONMENT program (Risk Assessment and Risk Management Procedure for Arsenic in the Tampere Region).

References

  1. Banks D, Younger PL, Arnesen RT, Iversen ER, Banks SB (1997) Mine-water chemistry: the good, the bad and the ugly. Environ Geol 32(3):157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blowes DW, Reardon EJ, Jambor JL, Cherry JA (1991) The formation and potential importance of cemented layers in inactive sulfide mine tailings. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55:965–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Jambor JL, Weisener, CG (2004) The geochemistry of acid mine drainage. In: Sherwood Lollar B (ed) Treatise on geochemistry–environmental geochemistry, vol 9, pp 149–204Google Scholar
  4. Bobachev AA (1994) IPI2Win software: http://geophys.geol.msu.ru/rec_labe.htlm
  5. Bobachev AA (2003) X2IPI software: http://geophys.geol.msu.ru/x2ipi/x2ipi.htlm
  6. Brookfield AE, Blowes DW, Mayer KU (2006) Integration of field measurements and reactive transport modeling to evaluate contaminant transport at a sulfide mine tailings impoundment. J Contam Hydrol 88:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buselli G, Lu K (2001) Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods. J Appl Geophys 48:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell DL, Fitterman DV (2000) Geoelectrical methods for investigating mine dumps. In: Proceedings from the fifth international conference on acid rock drainage, ICARD 2000, Littleton CO. Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, Inc., pp 1513–1523Google Scholar
  9. Campbell DL, Horton RJ (2001) Spectral-induced polarization studies of mine waste piles in Colorado and New Mexico. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 2001. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  10. Campbell DL, Fitterman DV, Hein AS, Jones DP (1998) Spectral induced polarization studies of mine dumps near Silverton, Colorado. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 1998. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 761–769Google Scholar
  11. Chouteau M, Poisson J, Aubertin M, Campos D (2005) Internal structure and preferential flow of a waste rock pile from geophysical surveys. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 2005. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 289–297Google Scholar
  12. Ebraheem MW, Bayless ER, Krothe NC (1990) A study of acid mine drainage using earth resistivity measurements. Ground Water 28:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forss M (2006) Structurell tolkning av lineament i flygbilder—Haveriområdet, Tammerfors skifferbälte. Master thesis, Åbo Akademi University, Institutionen för geologi och mineralogi (in Swedish), p 71Google Scholar
  14. Graupner T, Kassahun A, Rammlmair D, Meima JA, Kock D, Furche M, Fiege A, Schippers A, Melcher F (2007) Formation of sequences of cemented layers and hardpans within sulfide-bearing mine tailings (mine district Freiberg, Germany). Appl Geochem 22:2486–2508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guérin R, Bégassat P, Benderitter Y, David J, Tabagh A, Thiry M (2004) Geophysical study of the industrial waste land in Mortagne-du-Nord (France) using electrical resistivity. Near Surf Geophys 3:137–143Google Scholar
  16. Lin Z (1997) Mobilization and retention of heavy metals in mill-tailings from Garpenberg sulfide mines, Sweden. Sci Total Environ 198:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Loke MH, Barker RD (1996) Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophys Prospect 44:131–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mäkelä K (1980) Geochemistry and origin of Haveri and Kiipu, Proterozoic strata-bound volcanogenic gold-copper and zinc mineralizations from southwestern Finland. Bull Geol Surv Finl 310:17–39Google Scholar
  19. Martín-Crespo T, De Ignacio-San José C, Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Velázquez S, Lillo-Ramos J (2010) Monitoring study of the mine pond reclamation of Mina Concepción, Iberian Pyrite Belt (Spain). Environ Earth Sci 59:1275–1284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martínez-Pagán P, Faz-Cano A, Aracil E, Arocena JM (2009) Electrical resistivity imaging revealed the spatial properties of mine tailing ponds in the Sierra Minera of southeast Spain. J Environ Eng Geophys 14:63–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGregor RG, Blowes DW (2002) The physical, chemical and mineralogical properties of three cemented layers within sulfide-bearing mine tailings. J Geochem Explor 76:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moncur MC, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW, Jambor JL (2005) Release, transport and attenuation of metals from an old tailings impoundment. Appl Geochem 20:639–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nironen M (1994) Structural control and (re) mobilization of the extinct Haveri Au-Cu deposit, southern Finland. Bull Geol Soc Finl 66(1):39–44Google Scholar
  24. Painter MA, Laberty B, Stoertz MW, Green DH (2000) Resistivity imaging of a partially reclaimed coal tailings pile. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 2000. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  25. Palacki CJ (1987) Resistivity characteristics of geological targets. In: Nabighian MN (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, vol 1—Theory SEG, Investigation in Geophysics 3:53–129Google Scholar
  26. Parviainen A (2009) Tailings mineralogy and geochemistry at the abandoned Haveri Au–Cu mine, SW Finland. Mine Water Environ 28(4):291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poisson J, Chouteau M, Aubertin M, Campos D (2009) Geophysical experiments to image the shallow internal structure and the moisture distribution of a mine waste rock pile. J Appl Geophys 67(2):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Puustinen K (2003) Suomen kaivosteollisuus ja mineraalisten raaka-aineiden tuotanto vuosina 1530–2001, historiallinen katsaus erityisesti tuotantolukujen valossa. Mining industry and production of raw materials in Finland during 1530–2001, a historic review in the light of production figures. Geological Survey of Finland, report M 10.1/2003/3, 578 (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  29. Rucker DF, Glaser DR, Osborne T, Maehl WC (2009) Electrical resistivity characterization of a reclaimed gold mine to delineate acid rock drainage pathways. Mine Water Environ 28:146–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shemang EM, Laletsang K, Chaoka TR (2003) Geophysical investigation of the effect of acid mine drainage on the soil and groundwater near a mine dump, Selebi-Phikwe Cu-Ni Mine, NE Botswana. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 2003. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 930–937Google Scholar
  31. Sjödahl P, Dahlin T, Johansson S (2005) Using resistivity measurements for dam safety evaluation at Enemossen tailings dam in southern Sweden. Environ Geol 49:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith BD, Campbell DL, Wright WG (2001) Using resistivity to map acidic waters at the May Day mine dump, Silverton Colorado. In: Proceedings of the symposium for the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, SAGEEP 2001. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  33. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE (1990) Applied geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 770Google Scholar
  34. Vanhala H, Lahti M (2001) Tests of resistivity and IP methods for mapping mine tailings: results from Hammaslahti, a closed Cu mine in eastern Finland. In: Proceedings of 7th EEGS-ES meeting, Birmingham, England, 2–6 Sept 2001Google Scholar
  35. Vanhala H, Räisänen ML, Suppala I, Huotari T, Valjus T, Lehtimäki J (2005) Geophysical characterizing of tailings impoundment—a case from the closed Hammaslahti Cu–Zn mine, eastern Finland. Geological Survey of Finland, Special paper 38:49–60Google Scholar
  36. Yuval, Oldenburg DW (1996) DC resistivity and IP methods in acidic mine drainage problems: results from the Cooper Cliff mine tailings impoundments. J Appl Geophys 34:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edmundo Placencia-Gómez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Annika Parviainen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tero Hokkanen
    • 1
  • Kirsti Loukola-Ruskeeniemi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringHelsinki University of Technology, TKKEspooFinland
  2. 2.Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Geological Survey of FinlandEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations