Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 61, Issue 7, pp 1361–1373 | Cite as

Assessment of rockfall potential in the Kula (Manisa, Turkey) Geopark Region

  • Adil BinalEmail author
  • M. Ercanoğlu
Original Article

Abstract

The term Geopark is an interrelated phenomenon of geology, landscape, civilisation and society. One of the first Geopark areas in Turkey will be founded in the Kula district of Manisa. This region is an impressive area with its archaeological, historical and tourism-related features and its geological characteristics, such as cinders and maars, tectonic structures and earth pillars. Moreover, the earth pillars in the region present high-rockfall potential due to their geometric and lithologic peculiarities, formed by erosional processes. The present study aims in investigating the rockfall potential in this area by means of experimental investigation and numerical analyses. Extensive field studies including determination of earth pillar locations with rockfall potential, geological description of the earth pillars, scan-line surveys on discontinuities, identification of slope profiles, measurement of actual fallen block dimensions and sampling procedures were carried out. The eight earth pillar profiles were analysed to determine the run-out distances of basalt blocks and seven blocks were found to be capable of reaching the transportation line. For future protection purposes, barrier designs were suggested by computer analyses. Additional analyses were performed to determine rockfall-prone areas, taking into consideration the mapped rockfall source areas. Based on these analyses, the transportation line is threatened by potential rockfall. These results are in accordance with conclusions of the runout distance analyses. As a consequence, environmental aspects and rockfall phenomenon of the Kula Geopark Region must be taken into consideration during the planning process. It should also be pointed out that we have to own the values of geological heritages and to protect them based on the scientific and rational approaches.

Keywords

Earth pillar Geopark Kula Rockfall Rockfall proneness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Associate Prof. Dr. Işık Yılmaz for his valuable comments on the manuscript. The authors would like to present their special thanks to Mr. Halil Gülcü (the former mayor of Kula), Mr. Muammer Özoğuz and Dr. Banu Ebru Binal for their support during the field studies. The authors would also like to thank Mr. Rüçhan Haktanır and Mr. Özcan Uysal on behalf of the HAKMAK Co. Inc. for their logistic support.

References

  1. Agliardi F, Crosta GB (2003) High resolution three-dimensional numerical modelling of rockfalls. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:455–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksoy H, Ercanoğlu M (2006) Determination of the rockfall source in an urban settlement area by using a rule-based fuzzy evaluation. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:941–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aleotti P, Chowdhury R (1999) Landslide hazard assessment: a summary review and new perspectives. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58(1):21–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayala-Carcedo FJ, Cubillo-Nielsen S, Alvarez A, Domínguez MJ, Laín L, Laín R, Ortíz G (2003) Large scale rockfall reach susceptibility map in La Cabrera Sierra (Madrid) performed with GIS and dynamic analysis at 1:5.000. Nat Hazards 30:325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baillifard F, Jaboyedoff M, Sartori M (2003) Rockfall hazard mapping along a mountainous road in Switzerland using an empirical approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayhan H, Aydar E, Şen E, Gourgaud A (2006) Melting of crustal xenoliths within ascending basalt: example from the Kula volcanic field, western Anatolia, Turkey. Geomater (Sedimentol) C R Geosci 338:237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binal A (1996) Investigation of the instability mechanisms observed in volcanosedimentary rocks at Aksaray–Ihlara valley. Hacettepe University, Institute for Graduate Studies in Science and Engineering, Geological Engineering Department, MSc thesis, Ankara, p 97 (in Turkish)Google Scholar
  8. Borsi S, Ferrara G, Innocenti F, Mazzuoli R (1972) Geochronology and petrology of recent volcanics in the eastern Aegean Sea (West Anatolia and Lesvos Island). Bull Volcanol 36:473–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chau KT, Wong RHC, Wu JJ (2002) Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:69–77Google Scholar
  10. Çiftçi NB, Bozkurt E (2009) Evolution of the Miocene sedimentary fill of the Gediz Graben, SW Turkey. Sed Geol 216(3–4):49–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conefall (1.0) (2003) User’s Guide. Open report—Soft 01. Quanterra (http://www.quanterra.org)
  12. Copons R, Vilaplana JM (2008) Rockfall susceptibility zoning at a large scale: from geomorphological inventory to preliminary land use planning. Eng Geol 102(3–4):142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dorren LKA, Seijmonsbergen AC (2003) Comparison of three GIS-based models for predicting rockfall runout zones at a regional scale. Geomorphology 56(1–2):49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorren LKA, Maier B, Putters US, Seijmonsbergen AC (2004) Combining field and modelling techniques to assess rockfall dynamics on a protection forest hillslope in the European Alps. Geomorphology 57(3–4):151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duarte RM, Marquínez J (2002) The influence of environmental and lithologic factors on rockfall at a regional scale: an evaluation using GIS. Geomorphology 43(1–2):117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eberhardt E, Stead D, Coggan J, Willenberg H (2002) An integrated numerical analysis approach to the Randa rockslide. In: Proceedings of the first European conference on landslides, Prague, pp 355–362Google Scholar
  17. Ercan T, Erdogdu G, Bas H (1983) Petrology and plate tectonic implications of Denizli volcanics. Geol Soc Bull Turk 26(2):153–159Google Scholar
  18. Ersoy Y, Helvacı C, Sözbilir H, Erkül F, Bozkurt E (2008) A geochemical approach to Neogene–Quaternary volcanic activity of western Anatolia: an example of episodic bimodal volcanism within the Selendi Basin, Turkey. Chem Geol 255:265–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Evans SG, Hungr O (1993) The assessment of rockfall hazard at the base of talus slopes. Can Geotech J 30:620–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GGN (Global Geoparks Network) (2008) Guidelines and criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO’s assistance to join the Global Geoparks (http://www.globalgeopark.org/publish/portal1/tab121/info617.htm (verified 1 July 2009)
  21. Giacomini A, Buzzi O, Renard B, Giani GP (2009) Experimental studies on fragmentation of rock falls on impact with rock surfaces. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(4):708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gökçe O, Özden Ş, Demir A (2008) Türkiye’de afetlerin mekansal ve istatistiksel dağılımı afet bilgileri envanteri. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Afet Etüt ve Hasar Tespit Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara, p 112Google Scholar
  23. Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proc Geol Assoc 119(3–4):287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hantz D, Vengeon JM, Dussauge-Peisser C (2003) An historical, geomechanical and probabilistic approach to rock-fall hazard assessment. Nat Haz Earth Syst Sci 3:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holness MB, Bunbury JM (2006) Insights into continental rift-related magma chambers: cognate nodules from the Kula Volcanic Province, Western Turkey. J Volcanol Geother Res 153(3–4):241–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutchinson JN (1988) General report: morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on landslides. Rotterdam, Balkema, pp 3–35Google Scholar
  27. Jaboyedoff M, Baillifard F, Couture R, Derron MH, Locat J, Locat P (2005) Coupling kinematic analysis and sloping local base level criterion for large slope instabilities hazard assessment: a GIS approach. In: Hungr O, Fell R, Couture R, Eberhardt E (eds) Landslide risk management. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 615–622Google Scholar
  28. Okura Y, Kitahara H, Sammori T, Kawanami A (2000) The effects of rockfall volume on runout distance. Eng Geol 58(2):109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ozaner FS (2006) Kula çevresindeki volkanik şekillerin jeopark/jeoturizm potansiyeli. In: Geçmişten Geleceğe Köprü Yanık Ülke Kula Sempozyumu, 1–3 Eylül, Kula, pp 83–103Google Scholar
  30. Rocscience Inc. (2002) ROCFALL-computer program for risk analysis of falling rocks on steep slopes. Version 4.0, Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards LR, Peng B, Bell DH (2001) Laboratory and field evaluation of the normal coefficient of restitution for rocks rock mechanics: a challenge for society. In: Särkkä, Eloranta (eds) Proceedings of Eurock Conference. Finland, pp 149–155Google Scholar
  32. Şen E (2002) Kula bölgesi (Batı Anadolu, Türkiye) volkanizmasının volkanolojik-petrolojik gelişiminin incelenmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 269 p (unpublished)Google Scholar
  33. Topal T, Akın M, Özden UA (2007) Assessment of rockfall hazard around Afyon Castle, Turkey. Environ Geol 53(1):191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tunusluoğlu MC, Zorlu K (2009) Rockfall hazard assessment in a cultural and natural heritage (Ortahisar Castle, Cappadocia, Turkey). Environ Geol 56(5):963–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulusay R, Gökçeoğlu C, Topal T, Sönmez H, Tuncay E, Erguler ZA, Kasmer O (2006) Assessment of environmental and engineering geological problems for the possible re-use of an abandoned rock-hewn settlement in Urgüp (Cappadocia). Turkey 50(4):473–494Google Scholar
  36. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (ed) Landslides, analysis and control. Transportation Research Board, Special Report No. 176, National Academy of Sciences, pp 11–33Google Scholar
  37. Westaway R, Guillou H, Yurtmen S, Beck A, Bridgland D, Demir T, Scaillet S, Rowbotham G (2006) Late Cenozoic uplift of western Turkey: improved dating of the Kula quaternary volcanic field and numerical modelling of the Gediz River terrace staircase. Global Planet Change 51:131–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yılmaz I, Yıldırım M, Keskin I (2008) A method for mapping the spatial distribution of RockFall computer program analyses results using ArcGIS software. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geological Engineering DepartmentHacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations