Environmental Earth Sciences

, Volume 60, Issue 8, pp 1723–1730 | Cite as

Influence of geology in the geochemistry signature of Itacolomi State Park waters, Minas Gerais-Brazil

  • Mariangela G. Praça Leite
  • Maria Augusta Gonçalves FujacoEmail author
  • Hermínio A. NaliniJr.
  • Paulo de Tarso A. Castro
Original Article


In all geological scenarios, mineral water reactions will affect the water chemistry. As such, water resources in different rocks commonly involve different hydrogeological compartments. The aim of this work is to evaluate the influence of geology in the geochemistry signature of Itacolomi State Park waters. To do so, a survey of the geological units in the area was carried out, a geological/stratigraphic division was made, and its correlation with the main geological events was determined. Using the advantages of GIS, all the catchments were delimited. Based on this division, near 30 stream and lake segments were chosen for analyses. In each point, all physiochemical properties of the water were measured, and samples were collected to determine the concentrations of major and trace elements by ICP–OES. The dynamics of the Itacolomi State Park rock-soil and stream water solutions suggest that mixing of drainage waters from different bedrock and soil sources regulates stream water physical–chemical parameters and solute concentrations. The analytical data showed a clear correlation between the chemical compositions of the solute and the geological characteristics of the catchment. Units that are covered by iron oxide hardpan (Manso unit) and iron-banded formations (Custódio unit) show a large amount of soluble elements, including high values of Fe and Mn. On the other hand, the presence of high values of Al and K (Itacolomi unit) are a direct consequence of the presence of quartzite associated with low pH values.


Hydrogeochemistry Water–rock interactions Stream Itacolomi State Park Brazil 


  1. Agudo EG (1987) Guia de coleta e preservação de amostras de água, 1st edn. CESTEB, São Paulo, p 150Google Scholar
  2. Benson MA, Dalrymple T (1984) General field and office procedures for indirect discharge measurements. USGS, Applications of hydraulics—Book 3, 4th edn, p 35Google Scholar
  3. Chow VT (1959) Open-channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, Nova York, p 680Google Scholar
  4. Dorr JVN (1969) Physiographic, Stratigraphic and Structral Development of Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brazil. USGS, Washington, p 109Google Scholar
  5. Drever JI (1997) Geochemistry of natural waters, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, p 437Google Scholar
  6. Ferreira AF, Lazarin HA (1993). Caracterização litoestrutural e geomorfológica da região do Pico do Itacolomi, Ouro Preto. Graduation thesis, Geology Department, Federal University of Ouro Preto, p 54Google Scholar
  7. Fujaco MAG (2007) Influência dos diferentes tipos de substrato e geomorfologia na distribuição espacial e arquitetônica do gênero Ermanthus sp, no Parque Estadual do Itacolomi, Ouro Preto/MG. Master thesis, Federal University of Ouro Preto, p 111Google Scholar
  8. Gałuszka A (2007) A review of geochemical background concepts and an example using data from Poland. Environ Geol 52:861–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gentile JH, Harwell MA, Cropper Jr, Harwell CC, De Angelis D, Davis S, Ogden JC, Lirman D (2001) Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. Sci Total Environ 274:231–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenberg AE, Clesceri LS, Eaton AD (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th edn. American Public Health Association, the Water Environment Federation and the American Water Works Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Krauskopf BK (1983) Introduction to geochemistry, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill International Book Company, London, p 617Google Scholar
  12. Lobato LM, Achstschin AB, Timbó MA, Baltazar, OF, Silva SL, Reis LB, Baars FJ (2004) Geologia do Quadrilatero Ferrífero—Integração e Correção Cartográfica em SIG. Lydia Maria. Belo Horizonte: Codemig, 2004. 1cd-roomGoogle Scholar
  13. Marshak S, Alkmim FF (1989) Proterozoic extension/contraction of the sourther São Francisco Craton, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Tectonics 8:555–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meybeck M (1996) River water quality, global ranges time and space variabilities. Vehr Int Verein Limnol 26:81–96Google Scholar
  15. Miller JP (1961) Solutes in small streams draining single rock types, Sangre de Cristo Range, New Mexico. US Geol Surv, Water Supply Paper, 1535-FGoogle Scholar
  16. Moldan B, Cerny J (1994) Small catchment research. In: Moldan B, Cerny J (eds) Biochemistry of small cachments: a tool of environment research. Wiley, Chichester, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  17. Négrel P (2006) Water–granite interaction: clues from strontium, neodymium and rare earth elements in soil and waters. Appl Geochem 21:1432–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skoulikidis N (1993) Significance evaluation of factors controlling river water composition. Environ Geol 22:178–185Google Scholar
  19. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Am Geophys Union Trans 38:913–920Google Scholar
  20. Tempel RN, Shevenell LA, Lechler P, Price J (2000) Geochemical modeling approach to predicting arsenic concentrations in a mine pit lake. Appl Geochem 15:475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariangela G. Praça Leite
    • 1
  • Maria Augusta Gonçalves Fujaco
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hermínio A. NaliniJr.
    • 1
  • Paulo de Tarso A. Castro
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeologyOuro Preto Federal University, Campus do Morro do Cruzeiro, UFOPOuro PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations