Advertisement

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 98–102 | Cite as

A prospective study to evaluate the role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease

  • Bhanwar Singh Dhandhu
  • Gaurav Kumar Gupta
  • Shashank J. Wanjari
  • Nidhi Sharma
  • Sandeep Nijhawan
Original Article
  • 113 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Celiac disease (CeD) requires a biopsy from the small intestine to confirm the diagnosis. Conventionally, duodenal bulb (D1) was avoided as a biopsy site due to histological confounding factors at this site. However, sometimes, the bulb mucosa is the only affected site. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in duodenal bulb histology and compare it to distal duodenal histology and to analyze whether the addition of duodenal bulb biopsy increases the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

Methods

It was a prospective study comprising of 98 patients of CeD who were symptomatic clinically and had positive anti tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody. Endoscopically four mucosal biopsies were taken, two each from the bulb and distal duodenum, and morphology was graded as per modified Marsh grade.

Results

Iron deficiency anemia (40%) was a most common clinical presentation followed by chronic diarrhea (30%). Sixty patients showed same Marsh grade and 38 showed different Marsh grade at both sites. Patients who were showing the difference in the Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites, in place of; descending duodenum showed higher grade in 24 patients while higher mucosal atrophy was documented in the bulb in 14 patients. No patient of CeD had isolated D1 involvement. In eight patients, the correct diagnosis of CeD could be made only because of bulb biopsy.

Conclusion

Majority of the patients had no classical symptoms. Different Marsh grade at the two biopsy sites was documented demonstrating the patchy distribution of CeD. Combining biopsy from both bulb and descending duodenum maximizes the diagnostic yield of the CeD.

Keywords

Celiac disease Duodenal bulb biopsy Marsh grade 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

BSD, GKG, SJW, NS, and SN declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The authors declare that the study was performed in a manner conforming to the Helsinki declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

References

  1. 1.
    Green PHR, Cellier C. Celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1731–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ludvigsson JF, Rubio-Tapia A, van Dyke CT, et al. Increasing incidence of celiac disease in a North American population. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:818–24.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mustalahti K, Catassi C, Reunanen A, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Ann Med. 2010;42:587–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanders DS, Patel D, Stephenson TJ, et al. A primary care cross-sectional study of undiagnosed adult coeliac disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:407–13.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sood A, Midha V, Sood N, Avasthi G, Sehgal A. Prevalence of celiac disease among school children in Punjab, North India. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1622–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhattacharya M, Dubey AP, Mathur NB. Prevalence of celiac disease in North Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:415–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramakrishna BS, Makharia GK, Chetri K, Dutta S. Prevalence of adult celiac disease in India: regional variations and associations. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:115–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    West J, Fleming KM, Tata LJ, Card TR, Crooks CJ. Incidence and prevalence of celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis in the UK over two decades: population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:757–68.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopper AD, Cross SS, Sanders DS. Patchy villous atrophy in adult patients with suspected gluten-sensitive enteropathy: is a multiple duodenal biopsy strategy appropriate? Endoscopy. 2008;40:219–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lundin KE, Sollid LM. Advances in coeliac disease. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2014;30:154–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gonzalez S, Gupta A, Cheng J, et al. Prospective study of the role of duodenal bulb biopsies in the diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:758–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, et al. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2001;33:336–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ravelli A, Bolognini S, Gambarotti M, Villanacci V. Variability of histologic lesions in relation to biopsy site in gluten-sensitive enteropathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:177–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mooney PD, Kurien M, Evans KE, et al. Clinical and immunologic features of ultra-short celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1125–34.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walia BNS, Sidhu JK, Tandon BN, Ghai OP, Bhargava S. Celiac disease in North Indian children. Br Med J. 1966;2:1233–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Misra RC, Kasthuri D, Chuttani HK. Adult coeliac disease in tropics. Br Med J. 1966;2:1230–2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac disease and refractory celiac disease. In: Feldman M, Freidman LS, Brandt LJ. Ed. Sleisenger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease, Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2010; pp1797–820. 9th Edition.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mohindra S, Yachha SK, Srivastava A, et al. Coeliac disease in Indian children: assessment of clinical, nutritional and pathologic characteristics. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001;19:204–8.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poddar U, Thapa BR, Nain CK, Prasad A, Singh K. Celiac disease in India: are they true cases of celiac disease? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:508–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poddar U, Thapa BR, Singh K. Clinical features of celiac disease in Indian children: are they different from west? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:313–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bhattacharya M, Kapoor S, Dubey AP. Celiac disease presentation in a tertiary referral centre in India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2013;32:98–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Makharia GK, Baba CS, Khadgawat R, Lal S. Celiac disease: variations of presentations in adults. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26:162–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tapia AR, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Achkar E, Carey WD, Petras R, et al. Comparison of suction capsule and endoscopic biopsy of small bowel mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;32:278–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gottrand F, Turck D, Mitchell V, et al. Comparison of fiberendoscopy and Watson capsule for small intestinal biopsy in infants and children. Acta Paediatr. 1992;81:399–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mangiavillano B, Masci E, Parma B, et al. Bulb biopsy for the diagnosis of celiac disease in paediatric patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:564–8.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Levinson-Castiel R, Hartman C, Morgenstern S, et al. Role of duodenal bulb biopsy in the diagnosis of celiac disease in children. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:26–9.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bonamico M, Thanasi E, Mariani P,et al. Duodenal bulb biopsies in celiac disease: a multicenter study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2008;47:618–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhanwar Singh Dhandhu
    • 1
  • Gaurav Kumar Gupta
    • 1
  • Shashank J. Wanjari
    • 1
  • Nidhi Sharma
    • 2
  • Sandeep Nijhawan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologySawai Man Singh Medical CollegeJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Department of PathologySawai Man Singh Medical CollegeJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations