Advertisement

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology

, Volume 37, Issue 1, pp 25–30 | Cite as

Live donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure: A single center experience

  • Siddharth Mehrotra
  • Naimish Mehta
  • Prashantha S. Rao
  • Shailendra Lalwani
  • Vivek Mangla
  • Samiran Nundy
Original Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

Introduction

Acute liver failure (ALF) is an indication for emergency liver transplantation (LT). Although centers performing only deceased donor liver transplants (DDLT) have shown improved outcomes in this situation, they still have relatively long waiting lists. An alternative would be living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), which has shown equivalent outcomes in the elective situation but there is limited evidence of its results in ALF.

Aim

The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes in patients with ALF undergoing emergency LDLT in our center in Delhi, India.

Methods

We prospectively collected data on 479 patients who underwent LT in our hospital between January 2009 and December 2015 to evaluate the outcomes of those with ALF. The ALF patients were listed for transplantation after they met the Kings’ College criteria and rapid evaluation was done following a protocol consisting of three phases. Patients with grade III/IV encephalopathy were put on mechanical ventilation. Data regarding their postoperative course, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed.

Results

Thirty-six (7.5%) out of the 479 patients underwent emergency LT for ALF. Their mean age was 27.5 years (range 4–59 years) and the male to female ratio of 2:3. Preoperative intubation was required in 15 of 25 patients who had encephalopathy. Wilson’s disease was the most common cause of ALF in children while in adults, it was acute viral hepatitis. The time interval between listing and transplantation was a mean of 36 ± 12.4 h. The mean graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.06 ± 0.3. The recipients were extubated postoperatively after a mean period of 2.6 days and their mean ICU stay was 6.3 days. Postoperative infection was the most common complication and required upgradation of antifungal and antibiotic treatments. Neurological complications occurred in five patients. Thirty-one of 36 (86.1%) patients survived and progressive cerebral edema and sepsis were the most common causes of mortality. Patients who died had higher model for end-stage liver disease scores, longer cold ischemia time (CIT), and higher grades of encephalopathy (though 80% patients with encephalopathy survived). There was no donor mortality. At long-term follow up of a median of 56 months, 29 (80.5%) of 36 patients were still alive.

Conclusions

In our experience, LDLT is an alternative procedure to DDLT in patients with ALF and is associated with good outcomes even in patients with high grades of encephalopathy.

Keywords

Acute liver failure King’s College criteria Living donor liver transplantation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

SM, NM, PSR, SL, VM, and SN declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics statement

The study was performed conforming to the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008 concerning human and animal rights, and the authors followed the policy concerning informed consent as shown on Springer.com.

References

  1. 1.
    Rakela J, Lange SM, Ludwig J, Baldus WP. Fulminant hepatitis: Mayo Clinic experience with 34 cases. Mayo Clin Proc. 1985;60:289–92Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bismuth H, Samuel D, Castaing D, et al. Liver transplantation in fulminant and subfulminant hepatitis. Ann Surg. 1995;222:109–19Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Germani G, Theocharidou E, Burroughs AK, et al. Liver transplantation for acute liver failure in Europe: outcomes over 20 years from the ELTR database. J Hepatol. 2012;57:288–96Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Russo MW, LaPointe-Rudow D, Kinkhabwala M, Emond J, Brown RS Jr. Impact of adult living donor liver transplantation on waiting time survival in candidates listed for liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:427–31Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yuan D, Liu F, Chen KF, et al. Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:7234–41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamashiki N, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, et al. Outcomes after living donor livertransplantation for acute liver failure in Japan: results of a nationwide survey. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1069–77Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Urrunaga NH, Rachakonda VP, Magder LS, Mindikoglu AL. Outcomes of living versus deceased donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in the United States. Transplant Proc. 2014;46:219–24Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mack CL, Ferrario M, Abecassis M, Whitington PF, Superina RA, Alonso EM. Living donor liver transplantation for children with liver failure and concurrent multiple organ system failure. Liver Transpl. 2001;7:890–5Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chan G, Taqi A, Marotta P, et al. Long-term outcomes of emergency liver transplantation for acute liver failure. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1696–702Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaquero J, Fontana RJ, Blei AT, et al. Complications and use of intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with acute liver failure and severe encephalopathy. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:1581–9Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gasco J, Rangel-Castilla L, Franklin B, Thomas PG, Patterson JT. State-of-the-art management and monitoring of brain edema and intracranial hypertension in fulminant hepatic failure. A proposed algorithm. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2010;106:311–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernal W, Hyyrylainen A, Gera A, et al. Lessons from look-back in acute liver failure? A single centre experience of 3300 patients. J Hepatol. 2013;59:74–80Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olthoff KM, Merion RM, Emond JC, et al. A2ALL Study Group. Outcomes of 385 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients. Ann Surg. 2005;242:314–25.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Detry O, De Roover A, Honoré P, et al. Cadaveric liver transplantation for non-acetaminophen fulminant hepatic failure: a 20-year experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:1427–30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Farmer DG, Anselmo DM, Busuttil RW, et al. Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure. Ann Surg. 2003;237:666–76Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Acharya SK, Batra Y, Hazari S, Choudhury V, Panda SK, Dattagupta S. Aeopathogenesis of acute hepatic failure: eastern versus western countries. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:S268–73Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pandit A, Mathew LG, Bavdekar A, et al. Hepatotropic viruses as etiological agents of acute liver failure and related-outcomes among children in India: a retrospective hospital-based study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:381Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park SJ, Lim YS, Lee SG, et al. Emergency adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in a hepatitis B virus endemic area. Hepatology. 2010;51:903–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar R, Shalimar, Bhatia V, et al. Antituberculosis therapy-induced acute liver failure: magnitude, profile, prognosis, and predictors of outcome. Hepatology. 2010;51:1665–74Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar R, Shalimar, Sharma H, et al. Prospective derivation and validation of early dynamic model for predicting outcome in patients with acute liver failure. Gut. 2012;61:1068–75Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    McPhail MJ, Wendon JA, Bernal W. Meta-analysis of performance of Kings’s College Hospital Criteria in prediction of outcome in non-paracetamol-induced acute liver failure. J Hepatol. 2010;53:492–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Liver TransplantationSir Ganga Ram HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations