Prevalence and risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux in pregnancy
- 392 Downloads
Background and aim
Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) increases during pregnancy, due to several factors like decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, increased intra-abdominal pressure secondary to the enlarged gravid uterus and alteration in gastrointestinal transit. The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of GER in pregnancy in a southern State of the Indian subcontinent and determine the risk factors associated with it.
Consecutive pregnant females (n = 400) at various stages of pregnancy attending the antenatal clinic or admitted in the antenatal wards were enrolled. Patients with heartburn or regurgitation or both (n = 182) for at least a week were defined as cases, and controls were those without these symptoms (n = 218). Data on demographic variables and symptoms were analyzed using Pearson chi-square, Yates corrected chi-square and Fischer exact test and student independent t-test as appropriate; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Demographic characteristics between cases and controls were similar. The mean age of cases (23.68±3.37 years) was similar to that of controls (23.25±3.31 years). The overall prevalence of GER was 45.5% (182/400), 77 (19.3%) had heartburn (GER-HB), 54 (13.5%) had regurgitation (GER-R) and 51 (12.8%) had both (GER-HB + R). Age and gravida did not influence the frequency of symptoms. Symptoms were more frequent in the second (43.1%) and third trimester (54.1%) as compared to the first trimester (9.5%) in pregnant women with GER (p < 0.001). Atypical symptoms were uncommon. GER was common among non-vegetarians (p = 0.02) and frequent aerated beverage users (p = 0.001).
GER prevalence was high in pregnancy, often in second and third trimester. Non-vegetarianism and aerated beverages increased the risk of reflux in pregnancy.
KeywordsGastroesophageal reflux Pregnancy
We thank Mr Vengatesan A, Lecturer in Statistics, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Madras Medical College Hospital, Chennai, for statistical assistance.
Conflicts of Interest
- 9.Sharma PK, Ahuja V, Madan K, Raizada A, Sharma MP. Prevalence of symptomatic GERD: interim analysis of an adult community-based cross-sectional study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2004;23 Suppl 2:A11.Google Scholar
- 10.Kumar S, Karthik Selvaraj M, Jayanthi V. Prevalence of symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux amongst medical students. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006;25:168–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Rey E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Herraiz MA et al. Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms during and after pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:2395–400.Google Scholar
- 18.Al Amri SM. Twenty-four hour pH monitoring during pregnancy and at postpartum: a preliminary study. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102:127–30.Google Scholar
- 19.Klinkenberd-Knoll E, Castell DO. Clinical spectrum and diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In: Castell DO, editor. The Esophagus. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.; 1993. p. 441–8.Google Scholar