Skip to main content
Log in

Integrative Approach to Maxillary Reconstruction: Assessment of Proficiency of Zygomatic and 3D-Manufactured Patient-Specific Implants in Mucormycosis Post-COVID-19

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The prevalence of maxillary mucormycosis has surged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assesses the effectiveness of zygomatic implants and patient-specific 3D-manufactured implants in maxillary reconstruction post-mucormycosis secondary to COVID-19.

Methodology

Ten patients underwent surgical and prosthetic maxillary reconstruction utilizing zygomatic implants and patient-specific implants. Parameters including pain, implant exposure, infection, wound dehiscence, implant fit, post-operative surgical rating scale, oro-antral communication, facial edema, and orbital status were evaluated at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery.

Results

Statistical analysis revealed a positive association using SPSS version 20. Zygomatic implants combined with patient-specific implant systems demonstrated efficient therapeutic outcomes for maxillary reconstruction, within the limitations of the study.

Conclusion

The study concludes that the integration of patient-specific implant systems with zygomatic implants offers a promising therapeutic approach for maxillary reconstruction post-mucormycosis secondary to COVID-19. However, further research with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up periods is warranted to validate these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spagnuolo G, De Vito D, Rengo S, Tatullo M (2020) COVID-19 outbreak: an overview on dentistry. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(6):2094

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta A, Sharma A, Chakrabarti A (2021) The emergence of post-COVID-19 mucormycosis in India: Can we prevent it? Indian J Ophthalmol 69(7):1645

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Meher R, Wadhwa V, Kumar V, Shisha Phanbuh D, Sharma R, Singh I, Rathore PK, Goel R, Arora R, Garg S, Kumar S, Kumar J, Agarwal M, Singh M, Khurana N, Sagar T, Manchanda V, Saxena S (2022) COVID associated mucormycosis: a preliminary study from a dedicated COVID Hospital in Delhi. Am J Otolaryngol. 43(1):103220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gopal A, Sharma R, Negi S et al (2022) Post-COVID mucormycosis of mandible: a conundrum of management. Cureus 14(7):e27382

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar JA, Babu P, Prabu K, Kumar P (2013) Mucormycosis in maxilla: rehabilitation of facial defects using interim removable prostheses: a clinical case report. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 5(Suppl 2):S163–S165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Manmadhachary A, Malyala SK, Kumar R, Reddy H, Alwala A (2017) Design & manufacturing of Implant for reconstructive surgery: a case study. KnE Eng 9:143–149

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghantous Y, Nashef A, Mohanna A, Abu-El-naaj I (2020) Three-dimensional technology applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: current surgical implications. Nanomaterials 10(12):2523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Truscott A, Zamani R, Akrami M (2022) Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction. Biomed Eng Online 21(1):18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Prithviraj DR, Vashisht R, Bhalla HK (2014) From maxilla to zygoma: a review on zygomatic implants. J Dent Implants 4(1):44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosenstein J, Dym H (2020) Zygomatic implants: a solution for the atrophic maxilla. Dent Clin 64(2):401–409

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gulia S, Vigarniya MM (2017) A comprehensive review on zygomatic implants. J Health Allied Sci NU 7(04):043–048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arafat Y, Kumar YN, Bharani K et al (2021) COVID-19-related mucormycotic osteomyelitis of the maxilla: a case report of findings, surgical management and post-surgical rehabilitation. World J Dent 12(5):423–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim MM, Boahene KD, Byrne PJ (2009) Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complete maxillofacial defects. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11(1):53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Owusu JA, Boahene K (2015) Update of patient-specific maxillofacial implant. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 23(4):261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitsuishi M, Cao J, Bártolo P, Friedrich D, Shih AJ, Rajurkar K, Sugita N, Harada K (2013) Biomanufacturing. CIRP Ann 62(2):585–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Farré-Guasch E, Wolff J, Helder MN, Schulten EA, Forouzanfar T, Klein-Nulend J (2015) Application of additive manufacturing in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 73(12):2408–2418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaushik AS, Balaji T, Alwala AM (2022) Design, analysis, and fabrication of patient-specific implant for maxillofacial surgery. Int J Sci Res Eng Manage 06(06):1–13

  18. Grecchi F, Zecca PA, Macchi A, Mangano A, Riva F, Grecchi E, Mangano C (2020) Full-digital workflow for fabricating a custom-made direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) mandibular implant: a case report. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(8):2693

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zoabi A et al (2022) 3D printing and virtual surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Clin Med 11(9):2385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghantous Y, Nashef A, Mohanna A, Abu-El-Naaj I (2020) Three-dimensional technology applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery: current surgical implications. Nanomaterials (Basel) 10(12):2523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alández J, González-Martín O, Albrektsson T (2014) Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontology 2000 66(1):41–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MH (2013) Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 17(2):81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma A, Rahul GR (2013) Zygomatic implants/fixture: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol 39:215–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A (2016) Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: an updated systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 74(10):1949–1964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu YQ, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZY, Sun J, Huang W, Hu YJ, Zhang CP (2005) Zygomatic implants anchorage for the rehabilitation of maxillary defects. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 14(3):210–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang F, Monje A, Lin GH, Wu Y, Monje F, Wang HL, Davo R (2015) Reliability of four zygomatic implant-supported prostheses for the rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 30(2):293–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dominguez EA, Guerrero C, Shehata E, Van Sickels JE (2019) Zygoma implants or sinus lift for the atrophic maxilla with a dentate mandible: Which is the better option? Dental Clinics 63(3):499–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bedrossian E, Stumpel L III, Beckely M, Indersano T (2002) The zygomatic implant: preliminary data on treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17(6):861–865

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malevez C, Daelemans P, Adriaenssens P, Durdu F (2003) Use of zygomatic implants to deal with resorbed posterior maxillae. Periodontology 2000 33(1):82–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himaja Swayampakula.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arvind, U.D., Gaddipati, R., Alwala, A.M. et al. Integrative Approach to Maxillary Reconstruction: Assessment of Proficiency of Zygomatic and 3D-Manufactured Patient-Specific Implants in Mucormycosis Post-COVID-19. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02177-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02177-6

Keywords

Navigation