Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the Success Rate of Immediate Implant Using Clinical and Radiographic Interpretation Methods—A Prospective Study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Placement of implant into a tooth socket at the time of extraction is convenient for both patient and clinician, therefor evaluating the stability of ITI Type-1 implants.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the stability of immediately placed implant using radiographic and clinical technique at different intervals—immediately after implant placement, one month, 3, 6 months post-operatively.

Materials and Methods

35 cases required ITI Type-1 implant were selected as per the inclusion & exclusion criteria. Atraumatic extraction was done followed by implant osteotomy as per manufacturer’s instructions. The appropriately sized implants were Placed followed by placement of synthetic hydroxyapatite bone graft if needed. Clinical and radiographic evaluation were done at above mentioned specified intervals. Statistical analysis was done using Independent- t test and ANOVA with post hoc test.

Result

All the 35 implants were stable at the time of placement, only one implant failure was noticed at 6 months. Success rate of immediately placed implant was 97.14%. The radiographic analysis of bone on mesial side was − 0.148 (± 1.1731) and on distal side was − 0.353(± 1.5800).

Conclusion

Immediate implant shows satisfactory clinical & radiographic results with the added advantages like decrease treatment duration, number of surgeries and comparatively lesser complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muhamad AH, Georges C, Mustafa M, Abdulgani A (2017) Implant stability: methods and recent advances. J Dent Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-1608021323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zaki J, Yusuf N, El-Khadem A, Kevin Jenniskens RJPM (2021) Efficacy of bone-substitute materials use in immediate dental implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 23:506–519

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Soydan SS, Cubuk S, Oguz Y, Uckan S (2013) Are success and survival rates of early implant placement are higher than immediate implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:511–515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Swathi KV (2016) Immediate implants placement-a review. J Pharm Sci & Res 8(11):1315–1317

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle CH (2004) Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:12–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schultes G, Gaggl A (2001) Histologic evaluation of immediate versus delayed placement of implants after tooth extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 92:17–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S (2017) Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000 73(1):84–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Elias CN, Rocha FA, Nascimento AL, Coelho PG (2012) Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Altintas NY, Taskesen F, Bagis B, Baltacioglu E, Cezairli B, Senel FC (2015) Immediate implant placement in fresh sockets versus implant placement in healed bone for full-arch fixed prostheses with conventional loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mistry S, Kundu D, Datta S, Basu D (2011) Comparison of bioactive glass coated and hydroxyapatite coated titanium dental implants in the human jaw bone. Aust Dent J 56:68–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Misch CE, Implant success or failure: clinical assessment in implant dentistry. In Misch CE, editor: Contemporary implant dentistry. St Louis, 2005; pp 29–42.

  12. Dos Santos MV, Elias CN, Cavalcanti Lima JH (2011) The Effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants. Clin Implant Dentist Related Res 13(3):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maksoud MA (2001) immediate implants in fresh posterior extraction sockets: report of two cases. J Oral Implantol 27(3):123–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Slagter KW, Meijer HJ, Hentenaar DF, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM (2021) Immediate single-tooth implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation in bony defect sites in the esthetic region: a 5‐year randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 92(12):1738–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hui E, Chow J, Li D, Liu J, Wat P, Law H (2001) Immediate provisional for single-tooth implant replacement with briinemark system: preliminary report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 3(2):79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stanford CM (2008) Surface modifications of dental implants. Aust Dent J. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00038.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A (2000) Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: current status and future developments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:15–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Araújo MG, Silva CO, Souza AB, Sukekava F (2000) Socket healing with and without immediate implant Placement. Periodontol 2019(79):168–177

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xinbo Yu, Teng F, Zhao A, Yiqun W, Dedong Y (2022) Effects of post-extraction alveolar ridge preservation versus immediate implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Base Dent Pract. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fenner ENM (2006) Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clin Oral Imp Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01348.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Misch’s, (2019) contemporary implant dentistry, 4th ed.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dentistry, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, Rajkot, Gujarat, India

    Prafull Pujari & Satya Narain

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vyas Dental College and Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

    Jeevan Prakash Veerappa & Ashish Vyas

  3. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amritsar, Punjab, India

    Navdeep Singh

  4. Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MP Dental College & ORI, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

    Vrushti Ramanuj

Authors
  1. Prafull Pujari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeevan Prakash Veerappa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Satya Narain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ashish Vyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Navdeep Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vrushti Ramanuj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prafull Pujari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared there is no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Approved by institutional ethical committee with Approval number VDCH/IEC/21/2018 dated on 23 Nov 2018.

Informed Consent

A detailed pre-formed informed consents were taken from each and every patient.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pujari, P., Veerappa, J.P., Narain, S. et al. Evaluation of the Success Rate of Immediate Implant Using Clinical and Radiographic Interpretation Methods—A Prospective Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02110-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-024-02110-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation