Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Collagen Versus Xenograft Bovine Bone Inserted Into Extraction Sockets: Healing and Pain Management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Different materials can be used in filling the extraction socket to achieve an alveolar ridge preservation. The present study compared the wound healing potential and pain management efficacy of the collagen and the xenograft bovine bone, covered by a cellulose mesh, inserted into the socket of extracted teeth.

Materials and Methods

Thirteen patients were willingly chosen to enter our split-mouth study. It was a clinical trial of crossover design with a minimum of two teeth to be extracted for each patient. Randomly, one of the alveolar sockets was filled with collagen material as Collaplug®, and the second alveolar socket was filled with xenograft bovine bone substitute Bio-Oss® and covered with a cellulose mesh Surgicel®. Post-extraction follow-up was observed at day 3, 7 and 14, and each participant was told to document his/her pain experience in our prepared Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) document for 7 consecutive days.

Results

Clinically, the differential wound closure potential between the two groups was significant in the buccolingual (P = 0.045) but not significant in the mesiodistal (P = 0.204) mouth areas. The pain expressed as rated in the NRS was higher in the case of the Bio-Oss®, but there was no significant difference upon comparing the two procedures for 7 consecutive days (P = 0.397) except on day 5 (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Collagen appears to support faster wound healing rate, higher potential influence on socket healing and decreased pain perception than xenograft bovine bone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Willenbacher M et al (2016) The effects of alveolar ridge preservation: a meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18(6):1248–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Presson SM, Niendorff WJ, Martin RF (2000) Tooth loss and need for extractions in American Indian and Alaska Native dental patients. J Public Health Dent 60(Suppl 1):267–272

    Google Scholar 

  3. Van der Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE (2009) Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 36(12):1048–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J (2003) Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 30(9):809–818

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schropp L et al (2003) Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorat Dent 23(4):313–323

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elian N et al (2007) A simplified socket classification and repair technique. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 19(2):99–104 (quiz 106)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ettl T et al (2010) Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Clin Oral Investig 14(5):481–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jambhekar S, Kernen F, Bidra AS (2015) Clinical and histologic outcomes of socket grafting after flapless tooth extraction: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent 113(5):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnutenhaus S et al (2018) Alveolar ridge preservation with a collagen material: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontal Implant Sci 48(4):236–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Niki H et al (2001) Computed tomographic examination of bone healing after placement of collagen sponge matrix in the tooth extraction site. J Osaka Odontol Soc 64:369–374

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdelaziz MA et al (2015) Effect of collaplug® on the healing of extraction sockets in patients under oral anticoagulant therapy (clinical study). Alex Dent J 40(2):166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kao RT, Murakami S, Beirne OR (2000) The use of biologic mediators and tissue engineering in dentistry. Periodontol 50:127–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McAllister BS et al (1999) Eighteen-month radiographic and histologic evaluation of sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone in the chimpanzee. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(3):361–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pelegrine AA et al (2010) Clinical and histomorphometric evaluation of extraction sockets treated with an autologous bone marrow graft. Clin Oral Implants Res. 21(5):535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Proussaefs P et al (2003) The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral (bio-oss) for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: a human study. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 23(2):185–195

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X et al (2016) Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and dental implant placement using dentin matrix protein-1 gene-modified bone marrow stromal cells mixed with deproteinized boving bone: a comparative study in beagles. Arch Oral Biol 64:102–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindhe J et al (2014) Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(7):786–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williamson A, Hoggart B (2005) Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs 14(7):798–804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lund I et al (2002) Repeated massage-like stimulation induces long-term effects on nociception: contribution of oxytocinergic mechanisms. Eur J Neurosci 16(2):330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goissis G et al (1999) Biocompatibility studies of anionic collagen membranes with different degree of glutaraldehyde cross-linking. Biomaterials 20(1):27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gholami GA et al (2012) Clinical, histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of socket preservation using a synthetic nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 23(10):1198–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed AJ, Nichani AS, Venugopal R (2018) An evaluation of the effect of periodontal biotype on inter-dental papilla proportions, distances between facial and palatal papillae in the maxillary anterior dentition. J Prosthodont 27(6):517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai SJ et al (2019) Pure type-1 collagen application to third molar extraction socket reduces postoperative pain score and duration and promotes socket bone healing. J Formos Med Assoc 118(1 Pt 3):481–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun Y et al (2016) Test in canine extraction site preservations by using mineralized collagen plug with or without membrane. J Biomater Appl 30(9):1285–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuroscience Research Center NRC, School of Medical Sciences, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Vincent Saliba & Wafaa Takash Chamoun

  2. Prosthodontic Department, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Vincent Saliba

  3. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, School of Dentistry, Lebanese University, P.O. Box 5208-116, Beirut, Lebanon

    Nabih Nader & Antoine Berberi

Authors
  1. Vincent Saliba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nabih Nader
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Antoine Berberi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wafaa Takash Chamoun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Berberi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Disclaimer: The authors do not have any financial interests, either directly or indirectly, in the products or information listed in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saliba, V., Nader, N., Berberi, A. et al. Collagen Versus Xenograft Bovine Bone Inserted Into Extraction Sockets: Healing and Pain Management. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 21, 1101–1111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01411-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01411-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation