Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Randomized Control Trial to Assess Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Conventional Surgical Knife in Neck Dissection

  • Clinical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

We designed a prospective randomized study to assess the outcome of Colorado microdissection needle in comparison with conventional surgical blade for performing neck dissections.

Materials and Methods

Sixty patients who underwent neck dissection for oral cancers were randomly allocated into two groups. The outcome measurements were in terms of cosmetic outcome of neck scar, intraoperative blood loss, over all operative time, and postoperative neck drain assessment.

Results

The use of microdissection needle in performing skin incision and neck dissection eliminates the need for local anesthetic with vasoconstrictor along with significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and with acceptable cosmetic outcome. No significant difference was seen in perioperative and postoperative complications between both groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Farwell DG, Reilly DF, Weymuller EA Jr, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Futran NA (2002) Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol 128(5):505–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE (2007) Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 120(7):1892–1897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Algadiem EA et al (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21(2):e34131. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.34131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvi A (1997) Electrocutting cervical skin incisions: a cosmetic assessment. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 8(3):168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1043-1810(97)80023-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Osguthorpe JD (1992) Occupational human immunodeficiency virus exposure: risks to the health care worker. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 25:1341–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler PEM, Barry-Walsh C, Curren B, Grace PA, Leader M, Bouchier-Hayes D (1991) Improved wound healing with a modified electrosurgical electrode. Br J Plast Surg 44(7):495–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(91)90004-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitta N, Fukami T, Nozaki K (2011) Electrocautery skin incision for neurosurgery procedures. Neurol Med Chir 51(1):88–91. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.51.88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Papay FA, Stein J, Luciano M, Zins JE (1998) The microdissection cautery needle versus the cold scalpel in bicoronal incisions. J Craniofac Surg 9(4):344–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199807000-00010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

We confirm that this study was not funded by any organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Praveen Satish Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P.S., Rodrigues, E., Dhupar, V. et al. A Randomized Control Trial to Assess Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Conventional Surgical Knife in Neck Dissection. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 506–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0

Keywords

Navigation