Abstract
Aim
We designed a prospective randomized study to assess the outcome of Colorado microdissection needle in comparison with conventional surgical blade for performing neck dissections.
Materials and Methods
Sixty patients who underwent neck dissection for oral cancers were randomly allocated into two groups. The outcome measurements were in terms of cosmetic outcome of neck scar, intraoperative blood loss, over all operative time, and postoperative neck drain assessment.
Results
The use of microdissection needle in performing skin incision and neck dissection eliminates the need for local anesthetic with vasoconstrictor along with significant reduction in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage and with acceptable cosmetic outcome. No significant difference was seen in perioperative and postoperative complications between both groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Farwell DG, Reilly DF, Weymuller EA Jr, Greenberg DL, Staiger TO, Futran NA (2002) Predictors of perioperative complications in head and neck patients. Arch Otolaryngol 128(5):505–511
Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE (2007) Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 120(7):1892–1897
Algadiem EA et al (2016) Blood loss estimation using gauze visual analogue. Trauma Mon 21(2):e34131. https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.34131
Alvi A (1997) Electrocutting cervical skin incisions: a cosmetic assessment. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 8(3):168–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1043-1810(97)80023-1
Osguthorpe JD (1992) Occupational human immunodeficiency virus exposure: risks to the health care worker. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 25:1341–1354
Butler PEM, Barry-Walsh C, Curren B, Grace PA, Leader M, Bouchier-Hayes D (1991) Improved wound healing with a modified electrosurgical electrode. Br J Plast Surg 44(7):495–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(91)90004-4
Nitta N, Fukami T, Nozaki K (2011) Electrocautery skin incision for neurosurgery procedures. Neurol Med Chir 51(1):88–91. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.51.88
Papay FA, Stein J, Luciano M, Zins JE (1998) The microdissection cautery needle versus the cold scalpel in bicoronal incisions. J Craniofac Surg 9(4):344–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199807000-00010
Funding
We confirm that this study was not funded by any organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, P.S., Rodrigues, E., Dhupar, V. et al. A Randomized Control Trial to Assess Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Conventional Surgical Knife in Neck Dissection. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 19, 506–510 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0