Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Chronic Recurrent Temporomandibular Joint Dislocation: A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatment Options, and Demonstration of the Versatility and Efficacy of the Dautrey’s Procedure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There has been a changing trend of treating temporomandibular joint subluxation, which range from conservative non-surgical measures to various soft and hard tissue surgical procedures aimed at either augmenting or restricting the condylar path.

Aim

This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy of three major surgical treatment modalities: condylar obstruction creation, obstruction removal and anti-translatory procedures. Also, the location, anatomy and morphology of the TMJs pre- and post-surgery were evaluated and compared using radiographs, sagittal and 3-D Computed Tomographic scans.

Materials and Methods

A 6-year study was carried out on seventy-five patients of various age groups. Twenty-five were operated by the Dautrey’s procedure, 25 by articular eminectomy alone and the remaining 25 by eminectomy followed by meniscal plication and tethering. The distribution of patients in the three groups was random. Effectiveness of the surgical procedure and incidence of complications including recurrence were carefully compiled and compared between the three groups.

Results and Conclusion

Dautrey’s procedure yielded more gratifying and stable results, leading to a successful and permanent correction of chronic recurrent dislocation of the TMJs, with practically nil complications, thus demonstrating it to be an extremely safe, effective and versatile technique, making the joints function normally and securing sufficient volume of mouth opening. There was observed an average increase in articular tubercle height by 3.65 mm and a mean anterior shift of its lowest point by 4.5 mm following the Dautrey’s procedure, which were statistically significant findings. The upper age limit to carry out the Dautrey’s procedure can be safely taken up to 45 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helman J, Laufer D, Minkov B, Gutman D (1984) Eminectomy as surgical treatment for chronic mandibular dislocations. Int J Oral Surg 47:179–184

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babatunde BO (2011) Evaluation of the mechanism and principles of management of temporomandibular joint dislocation. Systematic review of literature and a proposed new classification of temporomandibular joint dislocation. Head Face Med 7:10–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhandari S, Swain M, Dewoolkar LV (2008) Temporomandibular joint dislocation after laryngeal mask airway insertion. Internet J Anesthesiol 16:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bauss O, Sadat-Khonsari R, Fenske C, Engelke W, Schwestka-Polly R (2004) Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in Marfan syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:592–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Undt G, Weichselbraun A, Wagner A, Kermer C, Rasse M (1996) Recurrent mandibular dislocation under neuroleptic drug therapy, treated by bilateral eminectomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24:184–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qiu WL, Ha Q, Hu QG (1989) Treatment of habitual dislocation of the temporomandibular joint with subsynovial injection of sclerosant through arthroscope. Proc Chin Acad Med Sci Peking Union Med Coll 4:196–198

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daif ET (2010) Autologous blood injection as a new treatment modality for chronic recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:31–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Martinez-Perez D, Garcia Ruiz-Espiga P (2004) Recurrent temporomandibular joint dislocation treated with botulinum toxin: report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:244–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caminiti MF, Weinberg S (1998) Review Chronic mandibular dislocation: the role of non-surgical and surgical treatment. J Can Dent Assoc 64:484–491

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gadre Kiran Shrikrishna, Kaul Deepak, Ramanojam Shandilya, Shah Shishir (2010) Dautrey’s procedure in treatment of recurrent dislocation of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2021–2024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Undt G, Kermer C, Piehslinger E, Rasse M (1997) Treatment of recurrent mandibular dislocation, Part I: Leclerc blocking procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:92–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. LeClerc G, Girard G (1943) Un nouveau proceed de butee dans le traitment chirurgical de la luvation recidivante de la manchoire inferieure. Mem Acad Chir 69:451–455

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gosserez M, Dautrey J (1967) Osteoplastic bearing for treatment of temporomandibular luxation. Transaction of second congress of the international association of oral surgeons Copenhagen, Munksgaard. Int J Oral Surg 4:261–263

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dautrey J (1975) Reflexions sur la chirugie de particulation temporomandibulaire. Stomologica Belg 72:577–579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pogrel MA (1987) Articular Eminectomy for recurrent dislocation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 25:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sato J, Suzuki T, Fujimura K (2003) Clinical Evaluation of arthroscopic eminoplasty for habitual dislocation of the temporomandibular joint- comparative study with conventional open eminectomy. J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinberg S (1984) Eminectomy and meniscorrhaphy for internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. Rationale and operative technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 57:241–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oatis G, Baker D (1984) The bilateral eminectomy as definitive treatment. J Oral Surg 3:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Myrhaug H (1951) A new method of operation for habitual dislocation of the mandible: review of former method of treatment. Acta Odontol Scand 9:247–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laskin DM (1973) Myotomy for the management of recurrent and protracted mandibular dislocation. Trans Int Conf Oral Surg 4:264–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gould JF (1978) Shortening of the temporalis tendon for hypermobility of the temporomandibular joint. J Oral Surg 36:781–783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sindet-Pedersen S (1988) Intraoral myotomy of the lateral pterygoid muscle for treatment of recurrent dislocation of the mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:445–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Varghese Mani (2005) Pterygoid plate disjunction: minimally invasive treatment for internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lawler MG (1982) Recurrent dislocation of the mandible : treatment of ten cases by the Dautrey procedure. Br J Oral Surg 20:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. To EWH (1991) A complication of the Dautrey’s procedure. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29:100–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobayashi H, Yamazaki T, Okudera H (2000) Correction of recurrent dislocation of the mandible in elderly patients by the Dautrey procedure. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 38:54–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harsha BC, Turvey TA, Powers SK (1986) Use of autogenous cranial bone graft in maxillofacial surgery: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:11–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson IT, Helden G, Marx R (1986) Skull bone grafts in maxillofacial and craniofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:949–955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Medraa AM, Mahrous AM (2008) Glenotemporal osteotomy and bone grafting in the management of chronic recurrent dislocation and hypermobility of the temporomandibular joint. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:119–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Karabouta I (1990) Increasing the articular eminence by the use of blocks of porous coralline hydroxyapatite for treatment of recurrent joint dislocation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 18:107–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Revington PJD (1986) The Dautrey procedure—a case for reassessment. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:217–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priya Jeyaraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author of this article has not received any research grant, remuneration, or speaker honorarium from any company or committee whatsoever, and neither owns any stock in any company. The author declares that she does not have any conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights

All procedures performed on the patients (human participants) involved were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution and/or national research committee, as well as with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments and comparable ethical standards.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants in this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeyaraj, P. Chronic Recurrent Temporomandibular Joint Dislocation: A Comparison of Various Surgical Treatment Options, and Demonstration of the Versatility and Efficacy of the Dautrey’s Procedure. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 17, 95–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1019-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1019-6

Keywords

Navigation