Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 164–168 | Cite as

Evaluation of Teeth in Line of Mandibular Fractures Treated with Stable Internal Fixation

  • K. O. Bang
  • P. K. Pandilwar
  • S. R. Shenoi
  • N. J. Budhraja
  • P. Ingole
  • V. S. Kolte
  • A. Garg
Research Paper

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether retention or removal of teeth in line of mandibular fractures affects the incidence of postoperative complications. To evaluate the fate of teeth retained in mandibular fractures based on location of fracture line in relation to apical foramen and lateral periodontium of retained tooth.

Method

51 mandibular fracture sites in 39 patients were treated by open reduction and internal fixation using miniplates. Teeth in line of fracture were removed if showed extensive caries, excessive mobility of tooth, or root fracture. Accordingly patients were divided into two groups, group I tooth removed (15 sites) and group II tooth retained (36 sites). Teeth retained in fracture line were classified based on position of the fracture in relation to apical foramen and the lateral periodontium of involved tooth estimated from preoperative panoramic radiograph into four types. Postoperative periodic follow up done for 1 year and seen for incidence of postoperative complications and fate of tooth in line of fracture.

Results

Out of 36 fracture sites in which teeth were retained 5 (13.89%) showed postoperative complications, and out of 15 fracture sites in which teeth were removed 3 (20%) showed postoperative complications. Out of 36 fracture sites in which tooth was retained we found in 3 cases fracture line passed through 2 adjacent teeth. Thus we had in total 39 teeth in fracture line out of them 26 required no treatment 9 required endodontic treatment and 4 teeth required extraction. Need for extraction and endodontic treatment was found more in type I and type III relation.

Conclusion

There is an increased risk for postoperative complications when a tooth is removed, although it is not statistically significant. Evaluation of fate of retained teeth showed better prognosis of teeth in type II cases than type III and type I cases. Results of this study leads to conclusions that teeth associated with mandibular fractures need not be removed on prophylactic basis.

Keywords

Mandibular fracture Open reduction and internal fixation Teeth in line of mandibular fracture 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All Authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Neal DC, Wagnes WF, Alpert B et al (1978) Morbidity associated with teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 36:859–862PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerbino G, Tarello F, Fasolis M, De Gioanni PP (1997) Rigid fixation with teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. Int J Oral Max Fac Surg 26:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kamboozia AH, Puninia Moothy A (1993) The fate of teeth in mandibular fractures lines: A clinical and radiographic follow up study. Int J Oral Max Fac Surg 22:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kahnberg KE, Ridell A (1979) Prognosis of teeth involved in the line of mandibular fractures. Int J Oral Surg 8:163–172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chrcanovic BR (2014) Teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18(1):7–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Amaratunga NA (1987) The effect of teeth in the line of mandibular fractures on healing. J Oral Max Fac Surg 45:312–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellis E (2002) Outcomes of patients with teeth in line of mandibular angle fractures treated with stable internal fixation. J Oral Max Fac Surg 60:863–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ellis E (1999) Treatment methods for fracture of the mandibular angle. Int J Oral Max Fac Surg 28:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rai S, Pradhan R (2011) Tooth in the line of fracture: its prognosis and its effects on healing. Indian J Dent Res 22(3):495–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thaller SP, Mabourakh S (1994) Teeth located in the line of mandibular fracture. J Craniofac Surg 5(1):16–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bobrowski AN, Sonego CL, Chagas OL (2013) Postoperative infection associated with mandibular angle fracture treatment in the presence of teeth on the fracture line: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42(9):1041–1048CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Iizuka R et al (1991) Infection after rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures, a clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Max Fac Surg 49:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berg S, Pape HD (1992) Teeth in the fracture line. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21:145–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oikarinen K, Lathi J, Rousha AM (1990) Prognosis of permanent teeth in the line of mandibular fractures. Endo Dent Trauatol 6(4):177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. O. Bang
    • 1
  • P. K. Pandilwar
    • 2
  • S. R. Shenoi
    • 1
  • N. J. Budhraja
    • 1
  • P. Ingole
    • 1
  • V. S. Kolte
    • 1
  • A. Garg
    • 1
  1. 1.VSPM’s DCRCNagpurIndia
  2. 2.GDCNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations