Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Proper and adequate documentation in operation notes is a basic tool of clinical practice with medical and legal implications. An audit was done to ascertain if oral and maxillofacial surgery operative notes in an Indian public sector hospital adhered to the guidelines published by the Royal College of Surgeons England.

Methods

Fifty randomly selected operative notes were evaluated against the guidelines by RCS England with regards to the essential generic components of an operation note. Additional criteria relevant to oral and Maxillofacial Surgery were also evaluated. Changes were introduced in the form of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery specific consent forms, diagram sheets and a computerized operation note proforma containing all essential and additional criteria along with prefilled template of operative findings. Re-audit of 50 randomly selected operation notes was performed after a 6 month period.

Results

In the 1st audit cycle, excellent documentation ranging from 94 to 100 % was seen in 9 essential criteria. Unsatisfactory documentation was observed in criteria like assistant name, date of surgery. Most consent forms contained abbreviations and some did not provide all details. Additional criteria specific to Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery scored poorly. In the 2nd Audit for loop completion, excellent documentation was seen in almost all essential and additional criteria. Mean percentage of data point inclusion improved from 84.6 to 98.4 % (0.001< P value <0.005). The use of abbreviations was seen in only 6 notes.

Conclusion

Regular audits are now considered a mandatory quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first completed audit on operation notes documentation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery from India. The introduction of a computerized operation note proforma showed excellent improvement in operation note documentation. Surgeons can follow the RCS guidelines to ensure standardization of operation notes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shayah A, Agada FO, Gunasekaran S, Jassar P, England RJA (2007) The quality of operative note taking: an audit using the Royal College of Surgeons guidelines as the gold standard. Int J Clin Pract 61:677–679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2008) Good surgical practice. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Payne K, Jones K, Dickenson A (2011) Improving the standard of operative notes within an oral and maxillofacial surgery department, using an operative note proforma. J Maxillofac Surg 10(3):203–208

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sinclair A (2008) How to set up a prospective surgical audit. In: Wilcox DT, Godbole PP, Koyle M (eds) Pediatric urology: surgical complications and management. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, p 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borchert D, Rarshen H, Kemps M, Lavelle M (2006) Operative notes teaching: re-discovery of an effective teaching tool in surgical training. Int J Surg 8(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Hussainy H, Ali F, Jones S, McGregor-Riley J, Sukumar S (2005) Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic and trauma surgery: the value of a proforma. Injury 35:1102–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lefter LP, Walker SR, Dewhurst F, Turner RWL (2008) An audit of operation notes: facts and ways to improve. ANZ J Surg 78:800–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers A, Banting M, Atherstone A (2008) The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit. S Afr Med J 98(9):726–728

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Din R, Jena D, Muddu BW (2001) The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(5):319–320

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. The Royal College of Surgeons of England (2014) Good surgical practice. The Royal College of Surgeons of England, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Krishnan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnan, B., Prasad, G.A. & Madhan, B. Improving the Quality of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgical Notes in an Indian Public Sector Hospital in Accordance with the Royal College of Surgeons Guidelines: A Completed Audit Loop Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 15, 315–320 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0850-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0850-x

Keywords

Navigation