Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Preoperative and Postoperative CT Scan Assessment of Pterygomaxillary Junction in Patients Undergoing Le Fort I Osteotomy: Comparison of Pterygomaxillary Dysjunction Technique and Trimble Technique—A Pilot Study

  • Clinical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the rate of complications and occurrence of pterygoid plate fractures comparing two techniques of Le Fort I osteotomy i.e., Classic Pterygomaxillary Dysjunction technique and Trimble technique and to know whether the dimensions of pterygomaxillary junction [determined preoperatively by computed tomography (CT) scan] have any influence on pterygomaxillary separation achieved during surgery.

Materials and methods

The study group consisted of eight South Indian patients with maxillary excess. A total of 16 sides were examined by CT. Preoperative CT was analyzed for all the patients. The thickness and width of the pterygomaxillary junction and the distance of the greater palatine canal from the pterygomaxillary junction was noted. Pterygomaxillary dysjunction was achieved by two techniques, the classic pterygomaxillary dysjunction technique (Group I) and Trimble technique (Group II). Patients were selected randomly and equally for both the techniques. Dysjunction was analyzed by postoperative CT.

Results

The average thickness of the pterygomaxillary junction on 16 sides was 4.5 ± 1.2 mm. Untoward pterygoid plate fractures occurred in Group I in 3 sides out of 8. In Trimble technique (Group II), no pterygoid plate fractures were noted. The average width of the pterygomaxillary junction was 7.8 ± 1.5 mm, distance of the greater palatine canal from pterygomaxillary junction was 7.4 ± 1.6 mm and the length of fusion of pterygomaxillary junction was 8.0 ± 1.9 mm.

Discussion

The Le Fort I osteotomy has become a standard procedure for correcting various dentofacial deformities. In an attempt to make Le Fort I osteotomy safer and avoid the problems associated with sectioning with an osteotome between the maxillary tuberosity and the pterygoid plates, Trimble suggested sectioning across the posterior aspect of the maxillary tuberosity itself. In our study, comparison between the classic pterygomaxillary dysjunction technique and the Trimble technique was made by using postoperative CT scan. It was found that unfavorable pterygoid plate fractures occurred only in dysjunction group and not in Trimble technique group. Preoperative CT scan assessment was done for all the patients to determine the dimension of the pterygomaxillary region. Preoperative CT scan proved to be helpful in not only determining the dimensions of the pterygomaxillary region but we also found out that thickness of the pterygomaxillary junction was an important parameter which may influence the separation at the pterygomaxillary region.

Conclusion

No untoward fractures of the pterygoid plates were seen in Trimble technique (Group II) which makes it a safer technique than classic dysjunction technique. It was noted that pterygoid plate fractures occurred in patients in whom the thickness of the pterygomaxillary junction was <3.6 mm (preoperatively). Therefore, preoperative evaluation is important, on the basis of which we can decide upon the technique to be selected for safer and acceptable separation of pterygomaxillary region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ueki K, Hashiba Y et al (2009) Assessment of pterygomaxillary separation in Le Fort I osteotomy in class III patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:833–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee Seung-Hun et al (2011) Evaluation of pterygomaxillary anatomy using computed tomography: are there any structural variations in cleft patients? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:2644–2649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang SY et al (2009) Importance of complete pterygomaxillary separation in the Le Fort I osteotomy: an anatomic report. Skull Base 19(4):273–277

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carr RJ, Gilbert P (1986) Isolated third nerve palsy following Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy in a patient with cleft lip and palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 24:206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newlands C, Dixon A, Altman K (2004) Ocular palsy following Le Fort 1 osteotomy: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 33:101–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JW et al (2011) Cranial nerve injury after Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:327–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reiner S, Willoughby JH (1988) Transient abducent nerve palsy following a Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy: report of a case. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Politis C et al (2012) Life-threatening hemorrhage after 750 Le Fort I osteotomies and 376 SARPE procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:702–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Newhouse RF, Sehow SR et al (1982) Life threatening hemorrhage from a Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cruz AAV (2006) Blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy: a possible complication associated with pterygomaxillary separation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 34(4):210–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lun-Jou et al (2002) Blindness as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary distraction. J Plast Reconstr Surg 109:688

  12. Bell WH (1975) Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of maxillary deformities. J Oral Surg 33:412

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trimble LD, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJW (1983) A modification of the pterygoid plate separation in low level maxillary osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goffinet L et al (2010) An arteriovenous fistula of the maxillary artery as a complication of Le Fort I osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38:251–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith et al (2008) Traumatic arteriovenous malformation following Le Fort I osteotomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 45(3):329–332

  16. Bhaskaran AA et al (2010) A complication of Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:292–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lanigan DT, Romanchuk K, Olson CK (1993) Ophthalmic complications associated with orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Precious DS, Goodday RH et al (1993) Pterygoid plate facture in Le Fort I osteotomy with and without pterygoid chisel: a computed tomography scan evaluation of 58 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rennick BM, Symington JM (1991) Postoperative computed tomography study of pterygomaxillary separation during the Le Fort I osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lanigan DT, Guest P (1993) Alternative approaches to pterygomaxillary separation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang K et al (2001) Le Fort I osteotomy with sparing fracture of lateral pterygoid plate. J Craniofac Surg 12(1):48–53

  22. Cheung LK et al (1998) Posterior maxillary anatomy: implications for Le Fort I osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ueki Koichiro et al (2011) Assessment of bone healing after Le Fort I osteotomy with 3-dimensional computed tomography. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39:237–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ueki Koichiro et al (2009) Determining the anatomy of the descending palatine artery and pterygoid plates with computed tomography in Class III patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 37:469–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wikkeling OME, Tacoma J (1975) Osteotomy of the pterygomaxillary junction. Int J Oral Surg 4:99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng LHH, Robinson PP (1993) Evaluation of a swan’s neck osteotome for pterygomaxillary dysjunction in the Le Fort I osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:52–53

  27. Laster Z, Ardekian L, Rachmiel A et al (2002) Use of the ‘shark-fin’ osteotome in separation of the pterygomaxillary junction in Le Fort I osteotomy: a clinical and computerized tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:100–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Juniper RP, Stajcic Z (1991) Pterygoid plate separation using an oscillating saw in Le Fort 1 osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19:153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanazawa T, Kuroyanagi N, Miyachi H et al (2013) Factors predictive of pterygoid process fractures after pterygomaxillary separation without using an osteotome in Le Fort I osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 115(310):310–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standard

Ethical approval was given by the Institutional Ethical Committee, SRM Dental College, Ramapuram, Chennai-89. Reference Number: SRMU/M&HS/SRMDC/2010-1013/M.D.S-PG Student/403. Patient consent: Written patient consent has been obtained to publish clinical photographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, SRM Dental College, SRM University, Chennai, 600069, Tamilnadu, India

    S. Shanmugasundaram & V. B. Krishnakumar Raja

  2. Dadwal niwas, Ghora chowki, Taradevi, Shimla, 171010, Himachal Pradesh, India

    Himani Dadwal

Authors
  1. Himani Dadwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Shanmugasundaram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. B. Krishnakumar Raja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himani Dadwal.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 170 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadwal, H., Shanmugasundaram, S. & Krishnakumar Raja, V.B. Preoperative and Postoperative CT Scan Assessment of Pterygomaxillary Junction in Patients Undergoing Le Fort I Osteotomy: Comparison of Pterygomaxillary Dysjunction Technique and Trimble Technique—A Pilot Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 14, 713–719 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0720-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0720-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation