Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison Between Betamethasone and Sodium Hyaluronate Combination with Betamethasone Alone After Arthrocentesis in the Treatment of Internal Derangement of TMJ—Using Single Puncture Technique: A Preliminary Study

  • Comparative Study
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to compare the intra-articular injection of betamethasone and sodium hyaluronate (combination) with betamethasone alone after arthrocentesis using single puncture technique into the upper joint space in the treatment of temporomandibular joint internal derangements.

Materials and Methods

Fourteen patients with internal derangement were randomly selected and divided into 2 groups (7 in each group). Arthrocentesis with single puncture technique of the upper joint space was then performed using ringer lactate under local anesthesia, followed by injection of either betamethasone and sodium hyaluronate combination or betamethasone alone into the joint. Clinical data was collected in the form of pain (visual analog scale), maximum mouth opening, and clicking sound before and after treatment up to 6 months.

Results

At the follow up of 6 months, there was statistically significant decrease in intensity of pain and increase in mouth opening was seen in betamethasone and sodium hyaluronate combination group compared to betamethasone alone group. Although there was statistically significant difference between the two groups when clicking was evaluated in the initial time interval (2nd post op day), on follow up of up to 6 months there was no statistically significant difference in clicking.

Conclusion

Although patients benefitted from both techniques, arthrocentesis with intra-articular injection of betamethasone and sodium hyaluronate combination is superior to arthrocentesis with betamethasone injection alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nitzan DW, Dolwik MF, Martinez GA (1991) Temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis: a simplified treatment for severe, limited mouth opening. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:1163–1167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frost DE, Kendell BD (1999) The use of arthrocentesis for treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:583–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alpaslan C, Dolwick MF, Heft MW (2003) Five year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:263–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rahal A, Poirier J, Ahmarani C (2009) Single-puncture arthrocentesis—introducing a new technique and a novel device. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:1771–1773

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alpaslan GH, Alpaslan C (2001) Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:613–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EL-Hakim IE, Abdel-Hamid S, Bader A (2005) Temporomandibular joint response to intra-articular dexamethasone injection following mechanical arthropathy: a histological study in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kopp S, Carlsson GE, Haraldson T, Wenneberg B (1985) The short term effect of intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate and corticosteroid on temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:429–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kopp S, Carlsson GE, Haraldson T, Wenneberg B (1987) The long term effect of intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate and corticosteroid on temporomandibular joint arthritis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:929–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rovetta G, Monteforte P (1998) Intraarticular injection of sodium hyaluronate plus steroid versus steroid in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Int J Tissue React 20(4):125–130

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Giraddi GB, Siddaraju A, Kumar B, Singh C (2012) Internal derangement of temporomandibular joint: an evaluation of effect of corticosteroid injection compared with injection of sodium hyaluronate after arthrocentesis. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 11(3):258–263

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmlund A, Hellsing G (1986) Arthroscopic surgery of the temporomandibular joint. Internal derangement with persistent closed lock. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 62:361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunjur J, Anand R, Brennan PA, Ilankovan V (2003) An audit of 405 temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with intra-articular morphine infusion. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:29–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Girish B. Giraddi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giraddi, G.B., Siddaraju, A., Kumar, A. et al. Comparison Between Betamethasone and Sodium Hyaluronate Combination with Betamethasone Alone After Arthrocentesis in the Treatment of Internal Derangement of TMJ—Using Single Puncture Technique: A Preliminary Study. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 14, 403–409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0626-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-014-0626-8

Keywords

Navigation