Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sinus Elevation with an Alloplastic Material and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 1-Stage Procedure in Severely Atrophic Maxillae

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims and objective

The aim of the study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically the long term success of one-stage direct (lateral) sinus lift procedure using alloplastic bone graft material and bio-absorbable membrane in conjunction with two stage implant placement in atrophic partially edentulous posterior maxilla.

Materials and methods

One stage direct maxillary sinus lift in conjunction with two stage implant placement was carried out in 12 patients at 13 sites. All the patients were partially edentulous with posterior maxillary alveolar ridge height of >5 mm and were in the age group of 20–50 years. Bioactive glass putty, bio-absorbable collagen membrane and 3.75 × 11.5 mm implants were used. Loading of implants was done 6 months after placement of implants. Patients were evaluated clinically and radio-graphically 6, 18, 30 months after placement of implants to assess increase in residual ridge height, peri-implant condition (marginal bone loss, plaque and gingival index) and implant stability.

Results

Maxillary first molar was the most common site (69.23 %) for sinus lift and implant placement. Caries was the most common cause (76.92 %) for loss of tooth. Increase in residual ridge height ranged from (71.43 to 133.33 %) as measured by Denta-Scan. Implant survival rate was 100 %. Marginal bone loss ranged from 0.68 to 1.22 mm. Implant stability was measured by periotest (−2.7 to −3.6). Only one patient had perforation of sinus membrane, but it was sealed satisfactorily by bio-absorbable membrane.

Conclusion

One stage lateral sinus lift procedure with alloplastic bone graft material in combination with 2 stage implant placement has a predictable outcome in patients with severe resorption of posterior maxilla.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Misch CE (1999) Book of contemporary implant dentistry, 2nd edn. Mosby Elseiver, Missouri

  2. Tatum OH (1986) Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin N Am 30:207–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyne P, James RA (1980) Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P (1998) Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla: comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 85:8–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Woo I, Le BT (2004) Maxillary sinus floor elevation—review of anatomy and two techniques. Implant Dent 13:28–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Browaeys H, Bouvry P, De Bruyn H (2007) A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 9:166–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghoreishian SM, Jamalpoor M (2006) Clinical, radiographic, and histologic comparison of ridge augmentation with bioactive glass alone and in combination with autogenous bone graft. Dent Res J 2(2)

  8. Mazor Z, Peleg M, Gross M (1999) Sinus augmentation for single-tooth replacement in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year follow-up clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:1999

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ardekian L, Oved-Peleg E, Mactei EE, Peled M (2006) The clinical significance of sinus membrane perforation during augmentation of the maxillary sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pikos MA (1999) Maxillary sinus membrane repair. Report of a technique for large perforations. Implant Dent 8:29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nystrom E, Ahlqvist J, Legrell PE, Kahnberg K-E (2002) Bone graft remodeling and implant success in the treatment of severly resorbed maxilla—A 5-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wallace SS, Froum SJ (2003) Effect of maxillary sinus floor augmentation on the survival of end osseous dental implants: a systemic review. Ann Periodontal 8:328–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmitt A, Zarb GA (1993) The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single tooth replacement. Int J Prosthodont 6:197–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, Trisi P (2004) MicroCT scan: microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 24:316–325

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uckan S, Deniz K, Dayangac E, Araz K, Özdemir BH (2010) Early implant survival in posterior maxilla with or without tricalcium phosphate sinus floor graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1642–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M, Beirne OR (1998) A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13:175–182

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallman M, Nordin T (2004) Sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite mixed with fibrin glue and later placement of non-submerged implant: a retrospective study in 50 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:222–227

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Valentini P, Abensus DJ (2003) Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone—a clinical report of long term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:556–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Schmelzeisen R (2003) Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autologus bonegraft to enable placement of SLA-surfaced implants—preliminary results after 15–40 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kahnberg K-E (2008) Sinus lift procedure using 2-stage surgical technique: clinical and radiograph reports up to 5 yrs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23:876–884

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to statistician Mr. Ghanshyam Patel.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bipin S. Sadhwani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jodia, K., Sadhwani, B.S., Parmar, B.S. et al. Sinus Elevation with an Alloplastic Material and Simultaneous Implant Placement: A 1-Stage Procedure in Severely Atrophic Maxillae. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 13, 271–280 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-013-0536-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-013-0536-1

Keywords

Navigation