Advertisement

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 271–275 | Cite as

Distribution of Third Molar Impactions Among Rural and Urban Dwellers in the Age Group of 22–30 years in South India: A Comparative Study

  • K. Venu Gopal ReddyEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Objectives

(1) To collect the data related to distribution of third molar impactions among rural population by clinical and radiological examinations. (2) To collect the information on distribution of third molar impactions among urban population by clinical and radiological examinations. (3) To compare the patterns of distribution of third molar impactions among rural and urban residents with respect to type of impaction, arch, gender and age.

Method

A cross-sectional study was conducted in Dharwad district of Karnataka state located in South India involving 630 rural and 270 urban subjects as per demographic profile of India. A two stage sampling procedure was adopted in the selection of the sample.

Statistical Analysis

Data was analyzed using STATISTICA-6.0. χ2 test was used to explore the association between different variables and third molar impactions. A P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

14.92% of rural subjects and 27.40% urban subjects were reported to be suffering from third molar impactions.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of third molar impactions among the study subjects was found to be 18.67%. A significant association was noticed between the ‘different arches’ and distribution of third molar impactions in both rural and urban population. Subjects with vertical impactions were found to be most common in both the groups.

Keywords

Third molar impaction Cross-sectional study Demographic profile Rural Urban Vertical impaction 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I thank Dr. S. B. Javali, Statistician, SDM. College of dental sciences, Dharwad for helping in the statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Prabhu SR, Wilson DF, Daftary DK, Johnson NN (1992) Anthropological aspects of dental morphology with special reference to tropical populations. In: Oral diseases in the Tropics. Oxford university press, Oxford, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olasoji HO, Odusanya SA (2000) Comparative study of third molar impaction in rural and urban areas of South Western Nigeria. J Odonto Stomatol Trop 23(90):25–28Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rajdan D (1996) A study of third molar teeth. J Ind Dent Assoc 67:6–11Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Census of India (2001) Available on link http://censusindia.gov.in/. Accessed on 20 Aug 2011
  5. 5.
    Ash M, Nelson SJ (2003) Development and eruption of the teeth. In: Wheelers dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion, 8th edn, pp 53Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park K (2009) Demography and family planning. In: Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine, 20th edn. Jabalpur, Bhanot Publishers, pp 415Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mahajan BK (1997) Sampling. In: methods in biostatistics, 6th edn. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Publishers, pp 88–102Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization (WHO) (1999) Geneva. Reliability and validity of data. In: Oral health surveys-basic methods, 4th edn. Delhi, A.I.T.B.S.Publishers, pp 13–15Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laskin DM (1984) Excision of unerupted and impacted teeth-odentectomy. In: Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery, vol 2, 6th edn. St. Louis, The C. V. Mosby Company, pp 49Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park K (2009) Health information and basic medical statistics. In: Park’s textbook of preventive and social medicine, 20th edn. Jabalpur, Bhanot Publishers, pp 755Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schearsten E, Lysell L, Rohlin M (1989) Prevalence of impacted third molars in dental students. Swed Dent J 13(1–2):7–9Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haider Z, Sulliman YS (1986) The incidence of impacted teeth in Saudi community. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15(5):569–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tudri S (1988) Incidence of impacted wisdom teeth and complications in Thai community. J Dent Assoc Thai 38(4):163–169Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kedar V, Nanavati SD (1997) Unusual impactions. J Ind Dent Assoc 49:259–266Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chu FC, Li TK, Lui VK, Newsome PR, Chow RL, Cheung LK (2003) Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathology—a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J 9(3):158–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Quek SL, Tay CK, Tay KH, Toh SL, Lim KC (2003) Pattern of third molar impaction in a Singapore Chinese population: a retrospective radiographic survey. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32(5):548–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saglam AA, Tuzum S (2003) Clinical and radiologic investigation of the incidence, complications and suitable removal times for fully impacted teeth in the Turkish population. Quinte int 34:53–59Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dachi SF, Howell FR (1961) A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs II, a study of impacted teeth. J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 14:1165–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hellman MO (1961) Our third molar teeth: their eruption, presence and absence. J Dent Cosmos 78:750–762Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Public health dentistryPeople’s college of dental sciences & Research centreBhopalIndia

Personalised recommendations