Abstract
Aim
The operative note needs to be an accurate and legible account of events occurring in the surgeon’s theatre. We set out to discover if operative notes within a British District General Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery department adhered to Royal College of Surgeons (England) guidelines.
Method
We audited 100 consecutive Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery operations performed within general theatres. As an intervention we designed and piloted a paper based Operative Note Proforma and re-audit was undertaken.
Results
Initial audit showed results lacking in certain areas. At re-audit all audit criteria showed improvement. The mean percentage of data point inclusion rose from 76.1 to 98.3% (0.001 < P-value < 0.005).
Conclusion
Previous papers have discussed various methods of improving operative note standards. We present statistical evidence for the use of an Operative Note Proforma to improve operative note standards within Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
National Confidential Enquiry into Perioperative Deaths. Who Operates When? II, 2003
Royal College of Surgeons of England. Good Surgical Practice, 2008
Batemen ND et al (1999) An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:94–95
Din R et al (2001) The use of an aide-memoire to improve the quality of operation notes in an orthopaedic unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83(5):319–320
Al Hussainy H et al (2004) Improving the standard of operation notes in orthopaedic, trauma surgery: the value of a proforma. Injury 35(11):1102–1106
Scherer R et al (2003) Comparison of information obtained by operative note abstraction with that recorded on a standardized data collection form. Surgery 133(3):324–330
Rogers A et al (2008) The quality of operative notes at a general surgery unit. S Afr Med J 98(9):726–728
Mathew J et al (2003) Quality of operative notes in a district general hospital: a time for change? Internet J Surg 5(1):1–5
Brown ML et al (2010) A pilot study of electronic cardiovascular operative notes: qualitative assessment, challenges in implementation. J Am Coll Surg 210(2):178–184
Atrey A et al (2010) Interactive computer operative notes for arthroscopy of joints: a free, accurate tool for surgeons. Arthroscopy 26(6):853–860
Curral VA et al (2008) Computer generated operation notes. Stud Health Technol Inform 137:51–55
O’Bichere A et al (1997) The quality of operation notes: can simple word processors help? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 7(5):204–208
Laflamme MR et al. (2005) Efficiency, comprehensiveness and cost-effectiveness when comparing dictation and electronic templates for operative reports. AMIA Annu Symp Proc, pp 425–429
Morgan D et al (2009) Improving operation notes to meet British Orthopaedic Association guidelines. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(3):217–219
Conflicts of Interests
The author declares there are no conflicts of interest concerning this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
Operative Proforma Sheet
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Payne, K., Jones, K. & Dickenson, A. Improving the Standard of Operative Notes within an Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, using an Operative Note Proforma. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 10, 203–208 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0231-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0231-z