Skip to main content

Primary and Secondary Closure of the Surgical Wound After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery volume 10, pages 112–117 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Aim

The present study attempted the evaluation of Primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted third molars in terms of healing, post-operative pain and swelling.

Material and Methods

60 patients with impacted mandibular third molars were randomly divided into two groups of 30. Panoramic radiographs were taken to assess degree of eruption and to asses 3rd molar angulations to the long axis of 2nd molar. Teeth were extracted, and in Group 1 the socket was closed by hermetically suturing the flap. In group II a 5–6 mm wedge of mucosa distal to the second molar was removed & the flap was repositioned. Interrupted sutures were given, so as to form a triangular opening distal to second molar measuring about 5 × 5 mm. Swelling and pain were evaluated for 7 days after surgery with the VAS scale.

Results

Study results showed that post operative Sequale were comparatively less in secondary closure group than the primary closure group. Pain showed statistically significant difference between two groups. Pain was less in secondary closure group from day 1 to day 7. Swelling & trismus was also significantly less in secondary closure group. Evaluation of the complications of these two techniques showed that delayed wound healing occurred in 66.6% of cases (20 cases out of 30) in secondary closure group where as dehiscence of suture line occurred in 33.33% of cases (10 out of 30) in primary closure group.

Conclusions

The results obtained in the present study enable us to conclude that, in cases of equal intra-operative difficulty, open healing of the surgical wound after removal of impacted third molars produces less post-operative swelling and pain than occurs with closed healing, by hermetically suturing the socket.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Ragno JR, Szkutnik AJ (1991) Evaluation of 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse on the prevention of alveolar osteitis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:524–526

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Emin E, Ferda T, Okan A (1999) Determination of the anti-inflammatory effect of methyl prednisolone on the sequelae of third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57:1201–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pederson A (1985) Decadronphosphate in relief of complaints after third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:235–240

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mohamed A, Daniel L (1983) Prophylactic use of indomethacin for prevention of postsurgical complications after removal of impacted third molar. J Oral Surg 55:448–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanz F, Anders H, Bjorn J, Leonard K (1985) Effect of application of cold dressing on the postoperative course in oral surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 14:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henrikson P-A, Thilander H, Wahlander LÅ (1985) Voltaren as an analgesic after surgical removal of lower wisdom tooth. Int J Oral Surg 14:333–338

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland CS, Hindle MO (1984) The influence of closure or dressing of third molar socket on postoperative swelling and pain. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 22:65–71

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Branbander EC, Georgio C (1998) The effect of surgical drain together with a secondary closer technique on post operative trismus, swelling and pain after mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 17:119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roberto P, Cerquerio F, Bessa-Nogueira RV (2004) Comparative study of the effect of a tube drain in impacted third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sutas R, Verasak P (1997) Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26:187–190

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pasqualini D, Cocera N, Castella A, Mela L, Braco P (2005) Primary and secondary closure of surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:52–57

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. David D, Marvin P, Chinnis RJ (1982) Comparison of primary and secondary closure techniques after removal of impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 11:631–634

    Google Scholar 

  13. Berge TI (1988) Visual analogue scale assessment of postoperative swelling: a study of clinical inflammatory variables subsequent to third-molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand 46:233–240

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berge TI (1989) The use of visual analogue scale in observer assessment of postoperative swelling subsequent to third-molar surgery. Acta Odontol Scand 47:167–174

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Sai Sansthan Hospital, Shirdi, Ahmednagar, India

    Kiran Khande

  2. Rural Dental College, LONI, Dist. Ahmednagar, Rahata, Maharashtra, India

    Harish Saluja & Uma Mahindra

Authors
  1. Kiran Khande
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Harish Saluja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Uma Mahindra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harish Saluja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khande, K., Saluja, H. & Mahindra, U. Primary and Secondary Closure of the Surgical Wound After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 10, 112–117 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0216-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-011-0216-y

Keywords

  • Primary closure
  • Secondary closure
  • Third molar
  • Swelling
  • Pain