Abstract
Coaches often use analogies and explain motion rules in their verbal instructions; however, little is known about how such communication influences the execution of movements of advanced players of various sports. In this study qualitative investigation is made into the effectiveness of analogy instruction and motion rule instruction on the tennis serve performance of advanced junior players. In a pretest, posttest, and retention test design, participants (n = 44; 11.5 years of age) were assigned to an analogy group, a motion rule group or a control group. After a 5-week intervention, experts used video recordings to assess changes in participants’ performance during the various phases of the tennis serve. While participants in the analogy group and the motion rule group improved their movements of the serve overall from the pretest to the posttest, their serve generally deteriorated from the posttest to the retention test, except during the impact phase of the serve. These results suggest that advanced junior tennis players generally benefitted from both analogy instruction and motion rule instruction. However, the participants seemed to benefit more from motion rule instructions over time, as the motion rule group demonstrated more consistent performance on the retention test than the analogy group.
Zusammenfassung
Sprachliche Instruktionen in Form von Analogien und Bewegungsregeln werden in der Kommunikation zwischen Trainern und Athleten häufig verwendet. Allerdings existieren nur wenige Untersuchungen, die die Wirkungen auf die Qualität der Bewegungsausführung fortgeschrittener Spieler verschiedener Sportarten in den Blick nehmen. Die vorliegende Studie greift diese Problematik auf und untersucht den Einfluss von Analogien und Bewegungsregeln auf die technische Qualität des Tennisaufschlags bei Nachwuchsspielern mit gutem bis sehr gutem Leistungsniveau. In einem Eingangs‑, Ausgangs- und Retentionstestdesign wurden junge Nachwuchstennisspieler (n = 44, 11,5 Jahre) einer Analogiegruppe, einer Bewegungsregelgruppe sowie einer Kontrollgruppe zugeordnet. Nach einer 5‑wöchigen Interventionsphase wurde ein videobasiertes Experten-Rating durchgeführt, um Veränderungen in der Leistung der Teilnehmer in verschiedenen Phasen des Aufschlags zu analysieren. In der Bewegungsregelgruppe und Analogiegruppe verbesserte sich die qualitative Aufschlagleistung vom Eingangs- zum Ausgangstest. Während die Leistung der instruierten Gruppen vom Ausgangstest zum Retentionstest insgesamt zurückging, zeigten die Ergebnisse der Treffpunktphase einen weiteren Leistungsanstieg. Generell deuten die Ergebnisse darauf hin, dass junge Tennisspieler sowohl von Analogie- als auch von Bewegungsregelanweisungen profitieren können. Die Teilnehmer scheinen jedoch über die Zeit mehr von den Bewegungsregeln zu profitieren, da die Bewegungsregelgruppe beim Retentionstest eine konstantere Leistung gezeigt hat als die Analogiegruppe.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The analogies used in the present study did not refer to the complete movement of the tennis serve. Due to the complex structure and kinematic chain of the tennis serve, we used analogies (or motion rules) for key points of the tennis serve.
In future studies, we would do administer a retention test with all the groups investigated in order to analyze the differences between the instructed groups and the control group. In addition, this would facilitate statistical analyses.
In the present study, we did not specify a serve variant (e.g., spin, flat). This could be investigated in future studies because particular serve variants may require more specific instructions.
References
Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. L. (1998). Video modeling and imaging training on performance of tennis service of 9‑to 12-year-old children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(2), 519–529.
Bobrownicki, R., MacPherson, A. C., Coleman, S. G., Collins, D., & Sproule, J. (2015). Re-examining the effects of verbal instructional type on early stage motor learning. Human movement science, 44, 168–181.
Bonato, M., Maggioni, M., Rossi, C., Rampichini, S., La Torre, A., & Merati, G. (2015). Relationship between anthropometric or functional characteristics and maximal serve velocity. J Sport Med Phys Fitness, 55, 1157–1165.
Brocken, J. E. A., Kal, E. C., & Van der Kamp, J. (2016). Focus of attention in children’s motor learning: examining the role of age and working memory. Journal of motor behavior, 48(6), 527–534.
Dana, A., & Gozalzadeh, E. (2017). Internal and external imagery effects on tennis skills among novices. Perceptual and motor skills, 124(5), 1022–1043.
Elliott, B. C., & Wood, G. A. (1983). The biomechanics of the foot-up and foot-back tennis service techniques. Australien Journal of Sport Science, 3(2), 3–6.
Emmen, H. H., Wesseling, L. G., Bootsma, R. J., Whiting, H. T. A., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1985). The effect of video-modelling and video-feedback on the learning of the tennis service by novices. Journal of Sports Sciences, 3(2), 127–138.
Fernandez-Fernandez, J., Ellenbecker, T., Sanz-Rivas, D., Ulbricht, A., & Ferrauti, A. (2013). Effects of a 6-week junior tennis conditioning program on service velocity. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 12(2), 232–239.
Féry, Y. A., & Morizot, P. (2000). Kinesthetic and visual image in modeling closed motor skills: the example of the tennis serve. Perceptual and motor Skills, 90(3), 707–722.
Fleisig, G., Nicholls, R., Elliott, B., & Escamilla, R. (2003). Tennis: Kinematics used by world class tennis players to produce high-velocity serves. Sports Biomechanics, 2(1), 51–64.
Frank, C., Land, W. M., Popp, C., & Schack, T. (2014). Mental representation and mental practice: experimental investigation on the functional links between motor memory and motor imagery. PLoS ONE, 9(4), e95175. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095175.
Frank, C., Land, W. M., & Schack, T. (2016). Perceptual-cognitive changes during motor learning: the influence of mental and physical practice on mental representation, gaze behavior, and performance of a complex action. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01981.
Gillet, E., Leroy, D., Thouvarecq, R., & Stein, J. F. (2009). A notational analysis of elite tennis serve and serve-return strategies on slow surface. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 23(2), 532–539.
Girard, O., Micallef, J. P., & Millet, G. P. (2005). Lower-limb activity during the power serve in tennis: effects of performance level. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 37(6), 1021–1029.
Gröben, B. (2000). Einheitenbildung im Bewegungshandeln – zur phänomenalen Struktur des sportbezogenen Bewegungslernens. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
Guillot, A., Desliens, S., Rouyer, C., & Rogowski, I. (2013). Motor imagery and tennis serve performance: the external focus efficacy. Journal of sports science & medicine, 12(2), 332–338.
Hernández-Davo, H., Urbán, T., Sarabia, J. M., Juan-Recio, C., & Moreno, J. F. (2014). Variable training: effects on velocity and accuracy in the tennis serve. Journal of sports sciences, 32(14), 1383–1388.
Kibler, W. B. (2014). Understanding the kinetic chain in tennis performance and injury. Aspetar Sports Medicine Journal, 3(1), 492–497.
Kleynen, M., Braun, S. M., Bleijlevens, M. H., Lexis, M. A., Rasquin, S. M., Halfens, J., Wilson, M. R., Beurskens, A. J., & Masters, R. S. (2014). Using a Delphi technique to seek consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to implicit and explicit forms of motor learning. PLoS One, 9(6), e100227.
Koedijker, J. M., Oudejans, R. R., & Beek, P. J. (2007). Explicit rules and direction of attention in learning and performing the table tennis forehand. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38(2), 227.
Koedijker, J. M., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., Oudejans, R. R., Beek, P. J., & Masters, R. S. (2011). Attention and time constraints in perceptual-motor learning and performance: Instruction, analogy, and skill level. Consciousness and cognition, 20(2), 245–256.
Koehn, S., Morris, T., & Watt, A. P. (2006). Efficacy of an imagery intervention to increase flow and performance. Medicine and Science in Tennis, 11(1), 12–14.
Kovacs, M., & Ellenbecker, T. (2011). An 8‑stage model for evaluating the tennis serve: implications for performance enhancement and injury prevention. Sports Health, 3(6), 504–513.
Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. (2009a). Analogy learning and the performance of motor skills under pressure. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31(3), 337–357.
Lam, W. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Masters, R. S. W. (2009b). Analogy versus explicit learning of a modified basketball shooting task: Performance and kinematic outcomes. Journal of sports sciences, 27(2), 179–191.
Liao, C. M., & Masters, R. S. (2001). Analogy learning: a means to implicit motor learning. Journal of sports sciences, 19(5), 307–319.
Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (2017). Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. Vol. 11. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Malouff, J. M., McGee, J. A., Halford, H. T., & Rooke, S. E. (2008). Effects of pre-competition positive imagery and self-instructions on accuracy of serving in tennis. Journal of Sport Behavior, 31(3), 264–275.
Masters, R. S. W., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., & Raab, M. (2008). Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. Journal of motor behavior, 40(1), 71–79.
Meier, C., & Gröben, B. (2016). Metaphorische Instruktionen bei der Vermittlung des Tennisaufschlags – Befunde und Perspektiven. In C. Heim, R. Prohl & H. Kaboth (Eds.), Schriften der Deutschen Vereinigung für Sportwissenschaft (Vol. 256, pp. 166–167). Hamburg: Feldhaus.
Mendes, C. P., Dias, G., Mendes, R., Martins, F. M., Couceiro, S. M., & Araújo, D. (2012). The effect of artificial side wind on the serve of competitive tennis players. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 12(3), 546–562.
Munzert, J. (1997). Sprache und Bewegungsorganisation: Untersuchungen zur Selbstinstruktion beim Bewegungslernen. Schorndorf: Hoffmann.
Myers, N. L., Kibler, W. B., Capilouto, G. J., Westgate, P. M., English, T., & Uhl, T. L. (2017b). Reliability of an observational method used to assess tennis serve mechanics in a group of novice raters. Journal of Medicine and Science in Tennis, 22(3), 6–12.
Myers, N. L., Kibler, W. B., Lamborn, L., Smith, B. J., English, T., Jacobs, C., & Uhl, T. L. (2017a). Reliability and validity of a biomechanically based analysis method for the tennis serve. International journal of sports physical therapy, 12(3), 437–449.
Poolton, J. M., Masters, R. S. W., & Maxwell, J. P. (2006). The influence of analogy learning on decision-making in table tennis: evidence from behavioural data. Psychology of sport and exercise, 7(6), 677–688.
Rahahleh, W., & Al-Khayyat, O. (2001). The effect of mental practice on placement and speed of serving in tennis. Educational Sciences, 28(1), 35–50.
Reid, M., Whiteside, D., & Elliott, B. (2010). Effect of skill decomposition on racket and ball kinematics of the elite junior tennis serve. Sports Biomechanics, 9(4), 296–303.
Rose, D. J., Heath, E. M., & Megale, D. M. (1990). Development of a diagnostic instrument for evaluating tennis serving performance. Perceptual and motor skills, 71(2), 355–363.
Schlapkohl, N., & Raab, M. (2016). Chapter 2 – importance of instructions in sport and exercise psychology. In M. Raab, P. Wylleman, R. Seiler, A.-M. Elbe & A. Hatzigeorgiadis (Eds.), Sport and exercise psychology research (pp. 29–41). San Diego: Academic Press.
Schlapkohl, N., Hohmann, T., & Raab, M. (2012). Effects of instructions on performance outcome and movement patterns for novices and experts in table tennis. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43(6), 522–541.
Schönborn, R. (2010). Optimales Tennistraining: der Weg zum erfolgreichen Tennis vom Anfänger bis zur Weltspitze. Balingen: Spitta.
Senn, S. (2006). Change from baseline and analysis of covariance revisited. Statistics in medicine, 25(24), 4334–4344.
Tielemann, N. (2008). Modifikation motorischer Lernprozesse durch Instruktionen. Wirksamkeit von Analogien und Bewegungsregeln. Leipzig: Leipziger Verlagsanstalt.
Tse, A. C. Y., Wong, T. W. L., & Masters, R. S. W. (2017). Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 78–84.
Tubez, F., Schwartz, C., Paulus, J., Croisier, J. L., Brüls, O., Denoël, V., & Forthomme, B. (2017). Which tool for a tennis serve evaluation? A review. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17(6), 1007–1033.
Van Abswoude, F., van der Kamp, J., & Steenbergen, B. (2019). The roles of declarative knowledge and working memory in explicit motor learning and practice among children with low motor abilities. Motor control, 23(1), 34–51.
Van Duijn, T. (2018). The influence of analogy instructions on motor skills: processing, preference and performance (thesis). Hamilton: University of Waikato. from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11842
Van Duijn, T., Hoskens, M. C. J., & Masters, R. S. W. (2019). Analogy instructions promote efficiency of cognitive processes during hockey push-pass performance. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 8(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/spy0000142.
Weber, K., Exler, T., Marx, A., Pley, C., Röbbel, S., & Schäffkes, C. (2010). Schnellere Aufschläge, kürzere Ballwechsel und höherer Zeitdruck für Grundschläge in der Tennis-Weltspitze. Leistungssport, 40(5), 36–42.
Whiteside, D., Elliott, B., Lay, B., & Reid, M. (2013). A kinematic comparison of successful and unsuccessful tennis serves across the elite development pathway. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 822–835.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Tennis Association of Westphalia and Tennispark Bielefeld for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
C. Meier, J. Fett and B. Gröben declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meier, C., Fett, J. & Gröben, B. The influence of analogy instruction and motion rule instruction on the learning process of junior tennis players. Ger J Exerc Sport Res 49, 291–303 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-019-00589-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-019-00589-y