Advertisement

German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 376–386 | Cite as

Residents’ perceptions of mega sport event legacies and impacts

The case of the Hamburg 2024 Olympic bid
  • Anja Scheu
  • Holger Preuss
Hauptbeitrag
  • 95 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine perceptions of local residents prior to the public referendum for the 2024 Hamburg Olympic bid and to assess their level of support for the bid. The representative survey conducted amongst Hamburg residents reveals a high level of support but also a strong perception of negative legacies. A comparison between the perceived positive and negative legacies shows that the negative legacies outweigh the positive legacies. When examining factors that influence support, statistical analysis reveals the perception of positive legacies as the strongest predictor of support. The survey also indicates that residents attach great importance to the costs of the Games and feel no personal benefit from hosting them. The findings suggest that Games organizers and authorities should mostly rely on positive legacies while negative legacies ought to be mitigated.

Keywords

Olympic Games Residents’ support Legacy Impact Referendum 

Die Wahrnehmung von Legacies und Auswirkungen eines Mega-Sportevents in der Bevölkerung

Die Bewerbung Hamburgs für die Olympischen Spiele 2024

Zusammenfassung

Die vorliegende Studie untersucht die Wahrnehmung der Bevölkerung im Hinblick auf die Bewerbung der Stadt Hamburg für die Olympischen und Paralympischen Spiele 2024 im Vorfeld des durchgeführten Referendums. Die repräsentative Umfrage unter Hamburger Bürgern zeigt einerseits ein hohes Maß an Unterstützung für die Bewerbung, andererseits jedoch eine starke Wahrnehmung von negativen „legacies”. Ein Vergleich der wahrgenommenen positiven und negativen „legacies“ zeigt, dass das Auftreten von negativen „legacies“ von der Bevölkerung stärker erwartet wird als das Auftreten positiver „legacies“. Mithilfe einer logistischen Regressionsanalyse wurden anschließend Faktoren gesucht, die sich auf das Maß an Unterstützung für die Bewerbung auswirken. Hierbei konnte die Wahrnehmung von positiven „legacies“ als Variable mit dem stärksten Einfluss identifiziert werden. Die Umfrage zeigt weiterhin, dass die Kosten der Olympischen Spiele von großer Bedeutung für die Befragten sind und diesen kein persönlicher Nutzen gegenübersteht. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Organisatoren und Verantwortliche insbesondere die positiven „legacies“ aufzeigen sollten, während mögliche negative „legacies“ abgeschwächt werden sollten.

Schlüsselwörter

Olympische Spiele Unterstützung der Bevölkerung Vermächtnis Impakt Referendum 

Notes

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

A. Scheu and H. Preuss declare that they have no competing interests.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Al-Emadi, A., Kaplanidou, K., Diop, A., Sagas, M., Le, K. T., & Al-Ali Mustafa, S. (2016). 2022 Qatar world cup: impact perceptions among Qatar residents. Journal of Travel Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516652502.Google Scholar
  2. Andereck, K. L., & McGehee, N. G. (2009). The attitudes of community residents towards tourism. In R. N. Moisey & S. F. McCool (Eds.), Tourism, recreation, and sustainability. Linking culture and the environment (2nd edn., pp. 236–259). Cambridge: CABI.Google Scholar
  3. Ap, J. (1992). Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(4), 665–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachleitner, R., & Zins, A. (1999). Cultural tourism in rural communities: the residents’ perspective. Tourism Management, 44(3), 203–212.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, H. A. (1958). Asking the embarrassing question. Public Opinion Quarterly, 22, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besculides, A., Lee, M. E., & McCormick, P. J. (2002). Residents’ perceptions of the cultural benefits of tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 303–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00066-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cegielski, M., & Mules, T. (2002). Aspects of residents’ perceptions of the GMC 400 – Canberra’s V8 supercar Race. Current Issues in Tourism, 5, 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chappelet, J.-L. (2012). Mega Sporting Event Legacies: A Multifaceted Concept. Papeles de Europa, 25, 76–86.  https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_PADE.2012.n25.41096.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, F., & Tian, L. (2015). Comparative study on residents’ perceptions of follow-up impacts of the 2008 Olympics. Tourism Management, 51, 263–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coates, D., & Wicker, P. (2015). Why were voters against the 2022 Munich Winter Olympics in a referendum? International journal of sport finance, 10(3), 267–283.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, D., Allen, J., & Cosenza, R. M. (1988). Segmenting local residents by their attitudes, interests, and opinions toward tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 27(2), 2–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004728758802700201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deccio, C., & Baloglu, S. (2002). Nonhost community resident reactions to the 2002 Winter Olympics: the spillover impacts. Journal of Travel Research, 41(1), 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deery, M., Jago, L., & Fredline, L. (2012). Rethinking social impacts of tourism research: a new research agenda. Tourism Management, 33(1), 64–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.01.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Emerson, R. M. (1976). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flyvbjerg, B., & Stewart, A. (2016). The Oxford Olympics Study 2016: cost and cost overrun at the Games. SSRN Electronic Journal.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804554.Google Scholar
  16. Fredline, E., & Faulkner, B. (1998). Resident reactions to a major tourist event: the gold coast Indy car race. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 5(4), 185–205.  https://doi.org/10.3727/106527098791784475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fredline, E., & Faulkner, B. (2001). Residents’ reactions to the staging of major motorsport events within their communities: a cluster analysis. Event Management, 7(2), 103–114.  https://doi.org/10.3727/152599501108751515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fredline, E., & Faulkner, B. (2002). Variations in residents’ reactions to major motorsport events: Why residents perceive the impacts of events differently. Event Management, 7, 115–125.Google Scholar
  19. Guala, A.-C., & Turco, D.-M. (2009). Resident perceptions of the 2006 Torino Olympic Games, 2002–2007. Choregia.  https://doi.org/10.4127/ch.2009.0039.Google Scholar
  20. Gursoy, D., & Kendall, K. W. (2006). Hosting mega events: modeling local’s support. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 603–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gursoy, D., Jurwoski, C., & Uysal, M. (2002). Resident attitudes: a structural modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gursoy, D., Yolal, M., Ribeiro, M. A., & Netto, P. A. (2017). Impact of trust on local residents’ mega-event perceptions and their support. Journal of Travel Research, 56(3), 393–406.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516643415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haxton, P. (2000). The perceived role of community involvement in the mega event hosting process: a case study of the Atlanta 1996 and Sydney 2000 Olympic Games (PhD Thesis), School of Leisure and Tourism, UTS, Sydney.Google Scholar
  24. Hiller, H. H., & Wanner, R. A. (2011). Public opinion in host olympic cities: the case of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games. Sociology, 45(5), 883–899.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karadakis, K., & Kaplanidou, K. (2012). Legacy perceptions among host and non-host Olympic Games residents: a longitudinal study of the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Games. European Sport Management Quarterly, 12(3), 243–264.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2012.680067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, S., & Petrick, J. (2005). Residents’ perceptions on impacts of the FIFA2002 World Cup: the case of Seoul as a host city. Tourism Management , 26, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, H. J., Gursoy, D., & Lee, S.-B. (2006). The impact of the 2002 World Cup on South Korea: comparisons of pre- and post-games. Tourism Management, 27(1), 86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ko, D.-W., & Stewart, W. P. (2002). A structural equation model of residents’ attitudes for tourism development. Tourism Management, 23(5), 521–530.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(02)00006-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Könecke, T., Schubert, M., & Preuss, H. (2015). (N)Olympia in Germany?: an analysis of the referendum against Munich 2022. Sportwissenschaft, 46(1), 15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-015-0384-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lankford, S. V., & Howard, D. R. (1994). Revising TIAS. Annals of Tourism Research, 21(4), 829–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, S., & Krohn, B. D. (2013). A study of psychological support from local residents for hosting mega-sporting events: a case of the 2012 indianapolis super bowl XLVI. Event Management, 17(4), 361–376.  https://doi.org/10.3727/152599513X13769392444585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, S.-B., Lee, C.-K., Kang, J.-S., Lee, E.-Y., & Jeon, Y. J. J. (2013). Residents’ perception of the 2008 Beijing Olympics: comparison of pre- and post-impacts. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(3), 209–225.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leopkey, B., & Parent, M. M. (2012). Olympic Games legacy: from general benefits to sustainable long-term legacy. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(6), 924–943.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2011.623006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li, S., & McCabe, S. (2013). Measuring the socio-economic legacies of mega-events: concepts, propositions and indicators. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15(4), 388–402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, X., & Wan, Y. K. P. (2016). Residents’ support for festivals: integration of emotional solidarity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(4), 517–535.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1224889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ma, S. C., & Kaplanidou, K. (2016). Examining the importance of legacy outcomes of major sport events for host city residents’ quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9496-1.Google Scholar
  39. Ma, S. C., & Ma, S. M. (2009). Residents’ attitudes towards the impacts of the 2009 world games. Review of Leisure, Sport, and Health, 1, 23–43.Google Scholar
  40. Ma, S. C. & Rotherham, I. D. (2015). Residents’ changed perceptions of sport event impacts: the case of the 2012 Tour de Taiwan, Leisure Studies,  https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2015.1035313.Google Scholar
  41. McGehee, N. G., & Andereck, K. L. (2004). Factors predicting rural residents’ support of tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 43(2), 131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504268234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mihalik, B. J., & Simonetta, L. (1999). A midterm assessment of the host population’s perceptions of the 1996 Summer Olympics: support attendance, benefits, and liabilities. Journal of Travel Research, 37(3), 244–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moisey, R. N., & McCool, S. F. (Eds.). (2009). Tourism, recreation, and sustainability: linking culture and the environment (2nd edn.). Cambridge: CABI. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10256999 Google Scholar
  44. Müller, M. (2012). Popular perception of urban transformation through megaevents: understanding support for the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 693–711.  https://doi.org/10.1068/c11185r.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd edn.). McGraw-Hill series in psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Nunkoo, R., & Alders, T. (2013). London residents’ support for the 2012 Olympic Games: the mediating effect of overall attitude. Tourism Management, 36, 629–640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Preuss, H. (2007). The conceptualisation and measurement of mega sport event legacies. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12(3–4), 207–228.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14775080701736957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Preuss, H. (2015). A framework for identifying the legacies of a mega sport event. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 643–664.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.994552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Preuss, H., & Solberg, A. H. (2006). Attracting major sporting events: the role of local residents. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(4), 391–411.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16184740601154524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Preuss, H., & Werkmann, K. (2011). Erlebniswert Olympischer Winterspiele in München 2018. Sport und Gesellschaft, 8(2), 97–123.Google Scholar
  51. Scheu, A., & Preuss, H. (2017). The legacy of the Olympic Games from 1896–2016. A systematic review of academic publications. Working Paper Series—Mainzer Papers on Sport Economics & Management, 14.Google Scholar
  52. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Twynam, G. D., & Johnston, M. (2004). Changes in host community reactions to a special sporting event. Current Issues in Tourism, 7(3), 242–261.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500408667981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vetitnev, A. M., & Bobina, N. (2015). Residents’ perceptions of the 2014 Sochi Olympic Games. Leisure Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2015.1105857.Google Scholar
  55. Waitt, G. (2003). Social impacts of the Sydney Olympics. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), 194–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(02)00050-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Woo, E., Uysal, M., & Sirgy, M. J. (2016). Tourism impact and stakeholders quality of life. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016654971.Google Scholar
  57. Zhou, Y. (2010). Residents perceptions toward the impacts of the Macao Grand Prix. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 11(2), 138–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhou, Y., & Ap, J. (2009). Residents’ perceptions towards the impacts of the Beijing 2008 Olympic Games. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1), 78–91.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287508328792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Sport Science, Department of Sport, Economics, Sport Sociology and Sport HistoryJohannes Gutenberg-University MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations