Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design of a sustainable integrated crude oil manufacturing network with risk cover and uncertainty considerations: a case study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oil industry is one of the largest and most influential manufacturing systems in the world. In addition to being the world’s leading source of energy, oil plays an important role in determining the national power and international reputation of various countries. This industry has certain characteristics that distinguish it from other manufacturing systems. Some of these characteristics include the strategic importance of products, variable prices, and political pressure. This industry is one of the most sophisticated manufacturing systems in the world, incorporating integrated activities from vendor to customer. In this paper, we presented a multi-objective integrated mathematical model including all three upstream, midstream, and downstream sectors of the crude oil supply chain. Our proposed multi-product, multi-period, and multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming model address an optimal solution. We have a scenario-based approach which deals with two sources of uncertainty. Conditional value at risk approach was applied to minimize the risk. Also, the social and environmental aspects of the supply chain are considered simultaneously to propose a sustainable model. Finally, the performance of the model is illustrated and analyzed using the real data of a national refining and distribution company. According to the results, the risk coverage by conditional value at risk has a positive impact on the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam A, Zakuan N, Bichi SAUAA, Shettima U, Ali M, Almasradi RB (2019) Supply chain sustainability practices of oil servicing firms in the downstream sector of Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. J Econ Inf 6(4):11–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadeh A, Shafiee F, Yazdanparast R, Heydari J, Fathabad AM (2017a) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization of environmental indicators of integrated crude oil supply chain under uncertainty. J Clean Prod 152:295–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Azadeh A, Shafiee F, Yazdanparast R, Heydari J, Keshvarparast A (2017b) Optimum integrated design of crude oil supply chain by a unique mixed integer nonlinear programming model. Ind Eng Chem Res 56(19):5734–5746

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boukouvala F, Li J, Xiao X, Floudas CA (2016) Data-driven modeling and global optimization of industrial-scale petrochemical planning operations. In: Paper presented at the 2016 American Control Conference (ACC).

  • Carneiro MC, Ribas GP, Hamacher S (2010) Risk management in the oil supply chain: a CVaR approach. Ind Eng Chem Res 49(7):3286–3294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delavar H, Sahebi H (2020) A sustainable mathematical model for design of net zero energy buildings. Heliyon 6(1):e03190

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani M, Rahmani D (2017) Production and distribution planning in petroleum supply chains regarding the impacts of gas injection and swap. Energy 141:991–1003

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes LJ, Relvas S, Barbosa-Póvoa AP (2013) Strategic network design of downstream petroleum supply chains: single versus multi-entity participation. Chem Eng Res Des 91(8):1557–1587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes LJ, Relvas S, Barbosa-Póvoa AP (2015) Downstream petroleum supply chain planning under uncertainty. Comput Aided Chem Eng 37:1889–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaithan AM, Attia A, Duffuaa SO (2017) Multi-objective optimization model for a downstream oil and gas supply chain. Appl Math Model 52:689–708

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ghezavati VR, Ghaffarpour M, Salimian M (2015) A hierarchical approach for designing the downstream segment for a supply chain of petroleum production systems. J Ind Syst Eng 8(4):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilani H, Sahebi H (2020) A multi-objective robust optimization model to design sustainable sugarcane-to-biofuel supply network: the case of study. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00639-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Pan W, Liu X, Li Y, Zeng B (2018) Combining a continuous location model and Heuristic techniques to determine oilfield warehouse locations under future oil well location uncertainty. Soft Comput 22(3):823–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider SW, Zhuang G, Ali S (2019) Identifying and bridging the attitude-behavior gap in sustainable transportation adoption. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(9):3723–3738

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Deng Y (2018) A hybrid intelligent model for assessment of critical success factors in high-risk emergency system. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 9(6):1933–1953

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann I, Comes T, Nickel S (2015) A critical review on supply chain risk—definition, measure and modeling. Omega 52:119–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini-Motlagh S-M, Samani MRG, Homaei S (2020) Blood supply chain management: robust optimization, disruption risk, and blood group compatibility (a real-life case). J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11(3):1085–1104

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbarzadeh A, Pishvaee M, Papi A (2016) A multi-period fuzzy mathematical programming model for crude oil supply chain network design considering budget and equipment limitations. J Ind Syst Eng 9:88–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi Y, Szmerekovsky J (2016) An optimisation model for downstream petroleum supply chain incorporating geographic information system (GIS). Int J Integr Supply Manag 10(2):151–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Xiao X, Boukouvala F, Floudas CA, Zhao B, Du G, Liu H (2016) Data-driven mathematical modeling and global optimization framework for entire petrochemical planning operations. AIChE J 62(9):3020–3040

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima C, Relvas S, Barbosa-Póvoa AP (2017) Stochastic modeling approach for downstream oil supply chain. Comput Aided Chem Eng 40:1339–1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Moradinasab N, Amin-Naseri M, Behbahani TJ, Jafarzadeh H (2018) Competition and cooperation between supply chains in multi-objective petroleum green supply chain: a game theoretic approach. J Clean Prod 170:818–841

    Google Scholar 

  • Mota N, Relvas S, Gonçalves J (2017) Downstream oil products distribution planning: a Portuguese case study. Optimization and decision support systems for supply chains. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasab NM, Amin-Naseri M (2016) Designing an integrated model for a multi-period, multi-echelon and multi-product petroleum supply chain. Energy 114:708–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira F, Grossmann IE, Hamacher S (2014) Accelerating benders stochastic decomposition for the optimization under uncertainty of the petroleum product supply chain. Comput Oper Res 49:47–58

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira F, Gupta V, Hamacher S, Grossmann IE (2013) A Lagrangean decomposition approach for oil supply chain investment planning under uncertainty with risk considerations. Comput Chem Eng 50:184–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürkoğlu Ö, Lawal O (2016) The integrated network model of pipeline, sea and road distribution of petroleum product. Int J Optim Control Theor Appl 6(2):151–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Panda D, Ramteke M (2018) Reactive scheduling of crude oil using structure adapted genetic algorithm under multiple uncertainties. Comput Chem Eng 116:333–351

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panda D, Ramteke M (2019) Preventive crude oil scheduling under demand uncertainty using structure adapted genetic algorithm. Appl Energy 235:68–82

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Petroleum B (2019) BP statistical review of world energy report. Petroleum B, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Relvas S, Magatão SNB, Barbosa-Póvoa APF, Neves F Jr (2013) Integrated scheduling and inventory management of an oil products distribution system. Omega 41(6):955–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribas GP, Hamacher S, Street A (2010) Optimization under uncertainty of the integrated oil supply chain using stochastic and robust programming. Int Trans Oper Res 17(6):777–796

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sahebi H, Nickel S (2014) Offshore oil network design with transportation alternatives. Eur J Ind Eng 8(6):739–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahebi H, Nickel S, Ashayeri J (2014a) Environmentally conscious design of upstream crude oil supply chain. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(28):11501–11511

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sahebi H, Nickel S, Ashayeri J (2014b) Strategic and tactical mathematical programming models within the crude oil supply chain context—a review. Comput Chem Eng 68:56–77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vidović M, Popović D, Ratković B (2014) Mixed integer and heuristics model for the inventory routing problem in fuel delivery. Int J Prod Econ 147:593–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang B, Zhang H, Yuan M, Guo Z, Liang Y (2020) Sustainable refined products supply chain: a reliability assessment for demand-side management in primary distribution processes. Energy Sci Eng 8(4):1029–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhan H, Zhang J (2015) Research of oil product secondary distribution optimization based on collaborative distribution. Procedia Comput Sci 60:1367–1376

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Lu J (2015) Optimization of China crude oil transportation network with genetic ant colony algorithm. Information 6(3):467–480

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Yang K, Yang J, Cao Y, Gan Y (2019) Energy-efficiency-oriented scheduling in smart manufacturing. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(3):969–978

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaghoubi S, Hosseini-Motlagh S-M, Cheraghi S, Larimi NG (2020) Designing a robust demand-differentiated platelet supply chain network under disruption and uncertainty. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11(8):3231–3258

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Wu J, Wang F (2019) CVaR-based risk assessment and control of the agricultural supply chain. Manag Decis 57(7):1496–1510. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-11-2016-0808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Xu M, Yu G, Zhang H (2009) Supply chain coordination with CVaR criterion. Asia Pac J Oper Res 26(01):135–160

    MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi-Babadi A, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Bozorgi-Amiri A, Seifi S (2017) Designing a reliable multi-objective queuing model of a petrochemical supply chain network under uncertainty: a case study. Comput Chem Eng 100:177–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhai J, Yu H (2019) Robust coordination of supply chain with loss aversion. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10(9):3693–3707

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samaneh Azarakhsh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1157 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azarakhsh, S., Sahebi, H. & Seyed Hosseini, S.M. Design of a sustainable integrated crude oil manufacturing network with risk cover and uncertainty considerations: a case study. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 14, 14477–14490 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02735-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02735-z

Keywords

Navigation