Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A heuristic fault diagnosis approach for electro-hydraulic control system based on hybrid particle swarm optimization and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a novel heuristic neural network model based on hybrid particle swarm optimization and Levenberg–Marquardt (HHPSOLM) algorithm was proposed for fault diagnosis in electro-hydraulic control system. In this algorithm, the characteristics of strong local searching capability in LM algorithm were adopted to increase the diversity of population. In the first stage, the proposed method searched ten steps with the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm for a random particle, and replaced the worst particle with the search result to increase the diversity. In the second stage, the HHPSOLM algorithm employed an inspiration to search the optimal solution with the LM algorithm for 30% of the particles to improve diversity of the particles. In the last stage, the feed-forward neural networks were trained with HHPSOLM to achieve the optimization of its weights and thresholds, then the fault diagnosis model of an electro-hydraulic control system was established with the HHPSOLM neural network. Its application in electro-hydraulic control system fault diagnosis was simulated. Experiment results showed that the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method was higher than those of the Particle Swarm Optimized BP neural network (PSO-BP) or BP algorithm, thus the HHPSOLM algorithm was an efficient algorithm for optimizing neural networks, and suitable for fault recognition of electro-hydraulic control system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Sahlol A, Hemdan AM, Hassanien AE (2016) Prediction of antioxidant status in fish farmed on selenium nanoparticles using neural network regression algorithm. In: Hassanien A, Shaalan K, Gaber T, Azar A, Tolba M (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on advanced intelligent systems and informatics. Springer, Cham, pp 353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Saud MS (2018) PSO of power cable performance in complex surroundings. IET Gener Transm Distrib 12(10):2452–2461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Lin Z (2014) Bayesian signal detection with compressed measurements. Inform Sci 289:241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Wang W, Wang J et al (2016) Excavation equipment recognition based on novel acoustic statistical features. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(12):4392–4404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Sarkar S, Hore S et al (2017) Particle swarm optimization trained neural network for structural failure prediction of multistoried RC buildings. Neural Comput Appl 28(8):2005–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XY, Gong RX, Xie LL et al (2017) Building regional covariance descriptors for vehicle detection. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 14(4):524–528

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal BS, Pattnaik SS (2017) Development of PSO-ANN ensemble hybrid algorithm and its application in compact crown circular fractal patch antenna design. Wirel Pers Commun 96(1):135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science (MHS'95). IEEE, pp 39–43

  • Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2000) Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2000 congress on evolutionary computation, vol 1. IEEE, pp 84–88

  • Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2001a) Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress on evolutionary computation, vol 1. IEEE, pp 81–86

  • Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2001b) Tracking and optimizing dynamic systems with particle swarms. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress on evolutionary computation, vol 1. IEEE, pp 94–100

  • Fei S (2017) Fault diagnosis of bearing based on wavelet packet transform-phase space reconstruction-singular value decomposition and SVM classifier. Arab J Sci Eng 42(5):1967–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi M, Aghaei J, Hadipour M (2017) New self-organising hierarchical PSO with jumping time-varying acceleration coefficients. Electr Lett 53(20):1360–1362

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves T, Egashira A (2013) Parallel swarms oriented particle swarm optimization. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput 2013:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Han HG, Zhang L, Qiao JF (2018) Data-based predictive control for wastewater treatment process. IEEE Access 6:1498–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanipanah M, Jahed AD, Bakhshandeh AH et al (2017) Application of PSO to develop a powerful equation for prediction of flyrock due to blasting. Neural Comput Applic 28(Suppl 1):1043–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou CG, Yu X, Cao YD et al (2017a) Prediction of synchronous closing time of permanent magnetic actuator for vacuum circuit breaker based on PSO-BP. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 24(6):3321–3326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou R, Chang YZ, Yang LQ (2017b) Multi-constrained QoS routing based on PSO for named data networking. IET Commun 11(8):1251–1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu G, Zhu F, Ren Z (2008) Power quality disturbance identification using wavelet packet energy entropy and weighted support vector machines. Expert Syst Appl 35(1–2):143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks, vol 4, no. 8, Perth, Australia, November 27–December 1995, pp 1942–1948

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart R (2002) A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In: International conference on systems, man, and cybernetics. Computational cybernetics and simulation, vol 5. IEEE, pp 4104–4108

  • Kennedy J, Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2001) Swarm intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Koduru P, Das S, Welch SM (2007) Multi-objective hybrid PSO using µ-fuzzy dominance. In: Conference on genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, pp 853–860

  • Leng X, Jiang H, Zuo X (2018) Human action tracking design of neural network algorithm based on GA-PSO in physical training. Cluster Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1658-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lera G, Pinzolas M (2002) Neighborhood based Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm for neural network training IEEETrans. Neural Netw 13(5):1200–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li YS, Lu WY, Zhao JB((2017) Detection of caloric value of coal using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy combined with BP neural networks. Spectrosc Spectr Anal 37(8):2575–2579

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Ding W, Li Z et al (2017) Prediction of high-speed grinding temperature of titanium matrix composites using BP neural network based on PSO algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(5–8):2277–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesbahi T, Khenfri F, Rizoug N et al (2017) Combined optimal sizing and control of Li-Ion battery/supercapacitor embedded power supply using hybrid particle swarm–nelder–mead algorithm. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 8(1):59–73

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakhtarin BI, Sidorkina YA, Khodunin AV (2017) Analysis of chaotic synchronization of cascade coupled systems for phase-locked loop using wavelet analysis. J Commun Technol Electron 62(11):1262–1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Eberhart R (1998) A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi YH, Eberhart R (1999) Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. J Syst Simul 3(1):31–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Sharma S (2018) A PSO based improved localization algorithm for wireless sensor network. Wirel Pers Commun 98(1):487–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman MA, Hasanien HM, Azazi HZ et al (2018) Hybrid ANFIS-GA-based control scheme for performance enhancement of a grid-connected wind generator. IET Renew Power Gener 12(7):832–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun YS, Zhang Q (2018) Optimization design and reality of the virtual cutting process for the boring bar based on PSO-BP neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 29(5):1357–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanita J (2017) Perspective analysis of telecommunication fraud detection using data stream analytics and neural network classification based data mining. Int J Inform Technol 9(3):303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Shen J, Yong J (2012) A survey on bio-inspired algorithms for web service composition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 16th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD ‘12), pp 569–574

  • Wang Z, Zhang X, Yang W (2016) Rule induction of breast cancer medical diagnose based on combination of rough sets, artificial neutral network and genetic algorithm. In: Control and decision conference. IEEE, pp 5707–5711

  • Wang Z, Wang B, Liu C et al (2017) Improved BP neural network algorithm to wind power forecast. J Eng 13:940–943

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Shen YX, Mao SW, Cao GQ et al (2018) Adaptive learning hybrid model for solar intensity forecasting. IEEE Trans Indus Inform 14(4):1635–1645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, Yu D, Cheng J (2006) A roller bearing fault diagnosis method based on EMD energy entropy and ANN. J Sound Vib 294(1–2):269–277

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HF, Dillon TS, Chen YPP (2017) Optimized structure of the traffic flow forecasting model with a deep learning approach. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(10):2371–2381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • You ZP, Ye XP, Zhang WH (2014a) Hydraulic system fault diagnosis method based on HPSO and WP-EE. Appl Mech Mater 577:438–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You ZP, Zhang WH, Ye XP (2014b) Diesel engine inlet and exhaust system fault detection based on PSO-BP NN. Appl Mech Mater 599–601:918–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu ZH, Xiao LJ, Li HY et al (2017) Model parameter identification for lithium batteries using the coevolutionary particle swarm optimization method. IEEE Trans Indus Electr 64(7):5690–5700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan HY, Wang XY, Sun X et al (2017) Compressive sensing-based feature extraction for bearing fault diagnosis using a heuristic neural network. Measure Sci Technol 28:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MY, Ma JJ, Gong MG (2017) Unsupervised hyperspectral band selection by fuzzy clustering with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 14(5):773–777

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao XX, Zhang SS, Zhou CL et al (2015) Experimental study of hydraulic cylinder leakage and fault feature extraction based on wavelet packet analysis. Comput Fluids 106(5):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao ZZ, Xu QS, Jia MP (2016) Improved shuffledfrog leaping algorithm-based BP neural network and itsapplication in bearing early fault diagnosis. Neural Comput Applic 27:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Plan of China under Grant No. 2016C31053, Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LY18F030003, Foundation of High-level Talents in Lishui City under Grant No. 2017RC01; Zhejiang Provincial Key R & D Program Plan of China under Grant No. 2018C01078.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Lishui University, Lishui, 323000, China

    Zhangping You & Chengbo Lu

  2. Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China

    Zhangping You

  3. Zhejiang King-Mazon Machinery Co., Ltd., Lishui, 312403, China

    Zhangping You

Authors
  1. Zhangping You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chengbo Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chengbo Lu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

You, Z., Lu, C. A heuristic fault diagnosis approach for electro-hydraulic control system based on hybrid particle swarm optimization and Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 14, 14873–14882 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0962-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0962-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation