Advertisement

Near-miss situation based visual analysis of SIEM rules for real time network security monitoring

  • Abdul Majeed
  • Raihan ur Rasool
  • Farooq Ahmad
  • Masoom Alam
  • Nadeem Javaid
Original Research
  • 150 Downloads

Abstract

Security information and event management (SIEM) systems are generally used to monitor the network for malicious activities. These systems are capable of detecting a wide range of malicious activities in the network using built-in rules to generate alerts on malicious activities. Although SIEM systems provide comprehensive reports about each alert including relevant details such as, severity score, events, and events counts. However, a key limitation of SIEM systems is not presenting the rule’s status in real time before an alert is raised. This paper presents a novel visual tool that enables security analyst to grasp visually, and in real time a complete overview of SIEM rules execution, and alert circumstances that may happen in advance based on near-miss situation. Apart from the real time rules analysis, it also enables security analysts to explore the reasoning behind the alerts in an organized and efficient manner via security questions. The essence of the approach is to evaluate and visualize the current status of each rule execution according to pre-compiled conditions in real time. We demonstrate the utility of our approach using IBM QRadar events data to support the informative analysis of different rules in real time, and security questions based insight about the rules via story page.

Keywords

Malicious SIEM systems Near-miss situation SIEM rules Alerts Informative analysis 

Notes

References

  1. Ab Rahman NH, Cahyani NDW, Choo KKR (2017) Cloud incident handling and forensic‐by‐design: cloud storage as a case study. Concurr Comp Pract Exp 29(14):e3868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ab Rahman NH, Choo K-KR (2015) A survey of information security incident handling in the cloud. Comput Secur 49:45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aguirre I, Alonso S (2012) Improving the automation of security information management: a collaborative approach. IEEE Secur Priv 10(1):55–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alsaleh M, Barrera D, van Oorschot PC (2008) Improving security visualization with exposure map filtering. In: Computer security applications conference, 2008. ACSAC 2008. Annual, IEEE, pp 205–214Google Scholar
  5. Anuar NB, Papadaki M, Furnell S, Clarke N (2010) An investigation and survey of response options for intrusion response systems (irss). In: Information security for South Africa (ISSA), 2010, IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  6. Attipoe AE, Yan J, Turner C, Richards D (2016) Visualization tools for network security. Electron Imaging 1:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azodi A, Cheng F, Meinel C (2016) Towards better attack path visualizations based on deep normalization of host/network ids alerts. In: 2016 IEEE 30th international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA), IEEE, pp 1064–1071Google Scholar
  8. Azodi A, Jaeger D, Cheng F, Meinel C (2013) A new approach to building a multi-tier direct access knowledgebase for IDS/SIEM systems. In: 2013 IEEE 11th international conference on dependable, autonomic and secure computing (DASC), IEEE, pp 118–123Google Scholar
  9. Balabine I, Velednitsky A (2018) Streaming method and system for processing network metadata. U.S. Patent No. 9,860,154. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnum S (2008) Common attack pattern enumeration and classification (capec) schema description. Cigital Inc, http://capec.mitre.org/documents/documentation/CAPEC_Schema_Description_v1 (3)
  11. Bauernschmidt B, Schuck J, Webb N (2004) Method and system for visualizing data from multiple, cached data sources with user defined treemap reports. U.S. Patent Application No. 10/371,638Google Scholar
  12. Brewer R (2015) Cyber threats: reducing the time to detection and response. Netw Secur 5:5–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Briesemeister L, Cheung S, Lindqvist U, Valdes A (2010) Detection, correlation, and visualization of attacks against critical infrastructure systems. In: 2010 eighth annual international conference on privacy security and trust (PST), IEEE, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  14. Cheswick WR, Bellovin SM, Rubin AD (2003) Firewalls and Internet security: repelling the wily hacker. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, BostonMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheung S, Lindqvist U, Fong MW (2003) Modeling multistep cyber attacks for scenario recognition, In: DARPA information survivability conference and exposition, 2003. Proceedings, vol 1, IEEE, pp 284–292Google Scholar
  16. Choo K-KR, Dehghantanha A (2018) Introduction to the minitrack on cyber threat intelligence and analytics. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii international conference on system sciencesGoogle Scholar
  17. Choo K-KR, Esposito C, Castiglione A (2017) Evidence and forensics in the cloud: challenges and future research directions. IEEE Cloud Comput 4(3):14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chuvakin A (2010) Siem: moving beyond compliance. White Paper for RSAGoogle Scholar
  19. Clayton J (2017) Statement on cybersecurity. Last Accessed 5 Feb 2018Google Scholar
  20. Conroy D (2016) Forensic data analysis challenges in large scale systems, In: Intelligent distributed computing IX, Springer, Berlin, pp 451–457Google Scholar
  21. Constantinescu Z, Vlădoiu M, Moise G (2016) Viznetdynamic visualization of networks and internet of things. In: RoEduNet conference: networking in education and research, 2016 15th, IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  22. Coppolino L, DAntonio S, Formicola V, Romano L (2011) Integration of a system for critical infrastructure protection with the ossim siem platform: a dam case study. In: International conference on computer safety, reliability, and security. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–212Google Scholar
  23. Coudriau M, Lahmadi A, François J (2016) Topological analysis and visualisation of network monitoring data: Darknet case study. In: 2016 IEEE international workshop on information forensics and security (WIFS), IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  24. DAmico A, Buchanan L, Kirkpatrick D, Walczak P (2016) Cyber operator perspectives on security visualization, In: Advances in Human Factors in Cybersecurity, Springer, pp 69–81Google Scholar
  25. Flynn L, Huth C, Trzeciak R, Buttles P (2012) Best practices against insider threats for all nations. In: Cybersecurity Summit (WCS), 2012 Third Worldwide, IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  26. Franklin L, Pirrung M, Blaha L, Dowling M, Feng M (2017) Toward a visualization-supported workflow for cyber alert management using threat models and human-centered design. In: 2017 IEEE symposium on visualization for cyber security (VizSec), IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  27. Fratto M (2004) Sneak previews-anomaly detection gets better-q1 labs qradar 3.0 provides comprehensive network behavior anomaly detection with its graphical views of all network traffic. Netw Comput Niles 15(11):32–33Google Scholar
  28. Gray CC, Ritsos PD, Roberts JC (2015) Contextual network navigation to provide situational awareness for network administrators. In: 2015 IEEE symposium on visualization for cyber security (VizSec), IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  29. Guimarães VT, Rendon OMC, dos Santos GL, da Cunha Rodrigues G, Freitas CMDS., Tarouco LMR, Granville LZ (2017) A reuse-based approach to promote the adoption of visualizations for network management tasks. In: 2017 IEEE 31st international conference on advanced information networking and applications (AINA), IEEE, pp 712–719Google Scholar
  30. Gupta A (2017) Review on big data promises for information security. J Data Min Manage 1(2):1–8Google Scholar
  31. Hao L, Healey CG, Hutchinson SE (2013) Flexible web visualization for alert-based network security analytics. In: Proceedings of the tenth workshop on visualization for cyber security, ACM, pp 33–40Google Scholar
  32. Hideshima, Y, Koike H (2006) Starmine: A visualization system for cyber attacks. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific symposium on information visualisation, vol 60. Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp 131–138Google Scholar
  33. Hinze SR, Rapp DN, Williamson VM, Shultz MJ, Deslongchamps G, Williamson KC (2013) Beyond ball-and-stick: Students’ processing of novel stem visualizations. Learn Instr 26:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holik F, Horalek J, Neradova S, Zitta S, Marik O (2015) The deployment of security information and event management in cloud infrastructure. In: 2015 25th international conference on Radioelektronika (RADIOELEKTRONIKA), IEEE, pp 399–404Google Scholar
  35. Huang Z, Shen C-C, Doshi S, Thomas N, Duong H (2015) Cognitive task analysis based training for cyber situation awareness. In: IFIP World conference on information security education. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–40Google Scholar
  36. Kabiri P, Ghorbani AA (2005) Research on intrusion detection and response: a survey. IJ Netw Secur 1(2):84–102Google Scholar
  37. Kotenko I, Polubelova O, Saenko I, Doynikova E (2013) The ontology of metrics for security evaluation and decision support in SIEM systems. In: 2013 eighth international conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES), IEEE, pp 638–645Google Scholar
  38. Lakkaraju K, Yurcik W, Lee AJ (2004) Nvisionip: netflow visualizations of system state for security situational awareness. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on visualization and data mining for computer security, ACM, pp 65–72Google Scholar
  39. Lakkaraju K, Bearavolu R, Slagell A, Yurcik W, North S (2005) Closing-the-loop in nvisionip: Integrating discovery and search in security visualizations. In: IEEE workshop on visualization for computer security, 2005 (VizSEC 05), IEEE, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  40. Langton JT, Baker A (2013) Information visualization metrics and methods for cyber security evaluation. In: 2013 IEEE international conference on intelligence and security informatics (ISI), IEEE, pp 292–294Google Scholar
  41. Lee D-G, Kim HK, Kim E (2015) Study on security log visualization and security threat detection using rgb palette. J Korea Inst Inf Secur Cryptol 25(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levine J, LaBella R, Owen H, Contis D, Culver B (2003) The use of honeynets to detect exploited systems across large enterprise networks, In: Information assurance workshop, 2003. IEEE systems, man and cybernetics society, IEEE, pp 92–99Google Scholar
  43. Li T, Yan L (2017) Siem based on big data analysis. In: International conference on cloud computing and security. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–175Google Scholar
  44. Lu M, Chen S, Lai C, Lin L, Yuan X (2017) Frontier of information visualization and visual analytics in 2016. J Vis 20(4):667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mahmood T, Afzal U (2013) Security analytics: Big data analytics for cybersecurity: A review of trends, techniques and tools. In: 2013 2nd national conference on information assurance (NCIA), IEEE, pp 129–134Google Scholar
  46. Mantere M, Sailio M, Noponen S (2013) Network traffic features for anomaly detection in specific industrial control system network. Future Internet 5(4):460–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marty R (2009) Applied security visualization. Addison-Wesley Upper Saddle River, BostonGoogle Scholar
  48. McKenna S, Staheli D, Meyer M (2015) Unlocking user-centered design methods for building cyber security visualizations. In: 2015 IEEE symposium on visualization for cyber security (VizSec), IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  49. Montesino R, Fenz S, Baluja W (2012) Siem-based framework for security controls automation. Inf Manag Comput Secur 20(4):248–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nguyen HT, Tran AVT, Nguyen TAT, Vo LT, Tran PV (2016) Multivariate cube for representing multivariable data in visual analytics. In: International conference on context-aware systems and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–100Google Scholar
  51. Nicolett M, Kavanagh KM (2011) Magic quadrant for security information and event management. Gartner RAS Core Reasearch Note (May 2009)Google Scholar
  52. Novikova ES, Bekeneva YA, Shorov AV (2017) Towards visual analytics tasks for the security information and event management. In: 2017 international conference quality management, transport and information security, information technologies (IT&QM&IS), IEEE, pp 90–93Google Scholar
  53. Oseku-Afful T (2016) The use of big data analytics to protect critical information infrastructures from cyber-attacksGoogle Scholar
  54. Parmelee MC (2010) Toward the semantic interoperability of the security information and event management lifecycle. In: Working Notes for the 2010 AAAI workshop on intelligent security (SecArt), Citeseer, pp 18Google Scholar
  55. Patil S, Meshram BB (2012) Intrusion prevention system. Int J Emerg Trends Eng Dev 4(2)Google Scholar
  56. Pavlik J, Komarek A, Sobeslav V (2014) Security information and event management in the cloud computing infrastructure. In: 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), IEEE, pp 209–214Google Scholar
  57. Product Brief (2008) ArcSight Logger, Simplifying Log Collection, Storage and Analysis, ArcSightGoogle Scholar
  58. Pronoza AA, Chechulin AA, Kotenko IV (2016) Mathematical models of visualization in siem systems. Trudy SPIIRAN 46:90–107Google Scholar
  59. Qamar S, Anwar Z, Rahman MA, Al-Shaer E, Chu B-T (2017) Data-driven analytics for cyber-threat intelligence and information sharing. Comput Secur 67:35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ring T (2014) Threat intelligence: why people don’t share. Comput Fraud Secur 3:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roberts C (2013) Discovering security events of interest using splunk. SANS InstituteGoogle Scholar
  62. Rohs M, Essl G (2006) Which one is better? Information navigation techniques for spatially aware handheld displays. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on multimodal interfaces. ACM, pp 100–107Google Scholar
  63. Rowland CH (2002) Intrusion detection system. U.S. Patent No. 6,405,318. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  64. Sethi A, Paci F, Wills G (2016) Eevi-framework for evaluating the effectiveness of visualization in cyber-security. In: 2016 11th international conference for internet technology and secured transactions (ICITST), IEEE, pp 340–345Google Scholar
  65. Shabtai A, Klimov D, Shahar Y, Elovici Y (2006) An intelligent, interactive tool for exploration and visualization of time-oriented security data. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on visualization for computer security. ACM, pp 15–22Google Scholar
  66. Shah A, Abualhaol I, Gad M, Weiss M (2017) Combining exploratory analysis and automated analysis for anomaly detection in real-time data streams. Technol Innov Manag Rev 7(4):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ohnof K, Koikef H, Koizumi K (2005) Ipmatrix: an effective visualization framework for cyber threat monitoring, pp 678–685Google Scholar
  68. Stein G, Chen B, Wu AS, Hua KA (2005) Decision tree classifier for network intrusion detection with ga-based feature selection. In: Proceedings of the 43rd annual Southeast regional conference, vol 2. ACM, pp 136–141Google Scholar
  69. Suarez-Tangil G, Palomar E, Ribagorda A, Zhang Y (2014) Towards an intelligent security event information management system. http://www.seg.inf.uc3m.es/papers/2013nova-AIS-SIEM.pdf
  70. Sun K, Jajodia S, Li J, Cheng Y, Tang W, Singhal A (2011) Automatic security analysis using security metrics. In: Military communications conference, 2011-Milcom 2011, IEEE, pp 1207–1212Google Scholar
  71. Sun Y, Overbye TJ (2004) Visualizations for power system contingency analysis data. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(4):1859–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tassone CF, Martini B, Choo K-KR (2017) Visualizing digital forensic datasets: a proof of concept. J Forensic Sci 62(5):1197–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Villella P, Petersen C (2011) Log collection, structuring and processing. U.S. Patent No. 8,032,489. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  74. Wenge O, Lampe U, Rensing C, Steinmetz R (2014) Security information and event monitoring as a service: a survey on current concerns and solutions. PIK-Praxis der Informationsverarbeitung und Kommunikation 37(2):163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yin X, Yurcik W, Treaster M, Li Y, Lakkaraju K (2004) Visflowconnect: netflow visualizations of link relationships for security situational awareness, In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Visualization and data mining for computer security. ACM, pp 26–34Google Scholar
  76. Zander S, Nguyen T, Armitage G (2005) Automated traffic classification and application identification using machine learning, In: The IEEE conference on local computer networks, 2005. 30th Anniversary, IEEE, pp 250–257Google Scholar
  77. Zhang T, Liao Q, Shi L, Dong W (2014) Analyzing spatiotemporal anomalies through interactive visualization. In: Informatics, vol 1. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, pp 100–125Google Scholar
  78. Zuech R, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wald R (2015) Intrusion detection and big heterogeneous data: a survey. J Big Data 2(1):3CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdul Majeed
    • 1
  • Raihan ur Rasool
    • 2
  • Farooq Ahmad
    • 3
  • Masoom Alam
    • 4
  • Nadeem Javaid
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Information and Electronics EngineeringKorea Aerospace UniversityGoyang-siSouth Korea
  2. 2.Victoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology (CCSIT)King Faisal UniversityAl-AhsaKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  4. 4.Department of Computer ScienceCOMSATS University IslamabadIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations