Advertisement

A symptom cluster-based triaging system for patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndromes

  • Chieh Lee
  • Ray F. Lin
  • Tai-Chih Huang
  • Kuang-Chau Tsai
Original Research
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

It is challenging to identify potential patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED), although these cases should immediately undergo further evaluation in the observation unit. This study aimed to establish a new and rapid assessment system for triaging patients with potential ACS in the ED. Data from 1022 cases (June 2012–August 2015) were evaluated using latent class analysis to identify key symptoms and medical histories. Significant variables in the latent class analysis were entered as predictors for the new triaging system, and the final model was selected based on the false alarm rate, hit rate, and discriminability index. The new system provided better discriminability and significantly reduced the false alarm rate, compared to conventional methods. Our results indicate that symptom clustering analysis can facilitate the identification of potential ACS cases using a risk stratification system in the ED. The symptom clustering may facilitate a rapid assessment tool that reduces the costs of unnecessary diagnosis and hospitalization. Furthermore, this system might be developed as an application for embedding in ambient assisted living homes.

Keywords

Latent class analysis Healthcare support system Humanized computing Emergency department management Ambient assisted living 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by funding from the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST103-2221-E-155-053-MY3). We thank Pei-Li Chung and Ming-Fen Guo for performing the data collection.

References

  1. Acute Coronary Syndromes Algorithm (2018) Using the acute coronary syndromes algorithm for managing the patient. https://www.acls.net/acute-coronary-syndromes-algorithm.htm. Accessed 11 April 2018
  2. Ahmadi E, Weckman GR, Masel DT (2017) Decision making model to predict presence of coronary artery disease using neural network and C5.0 decision tree. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0499-z Google Scholar
  3. Amiribesheli M, Benmansour A, Bouchachia A (2015) A review of smart homes in healthcare. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 6(4):495–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA et al (2010) Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 122(17):1756–1776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brieger D, Eagle KA, Goodman SG et al (2004) Acute coronary syndromes without chest pain, an underdiagnosed and undertreated high-risk group: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Chest 126:46146–46149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannon CP, Gibson CM, Lambrew CT et al (2000) Relationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 283:2941–2947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Canto JG, Goldberg RJ, Hand MM, Bonow RO, Sopko G, Pepine CJ, Long T (2007) Symptom presentation of women with acute coronary syndromes: myth vs. reality. Arch Intern Med 167(22):2405–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang AM, Mumma B, Sease KL et al (2007) Gender bias in cardiovascular testing persists after adjustment for presenting characteristics and cardiac risk. Soc Acad Emerg Med 14(7):599–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen KC, Hsu JC, Cheng IN et al (2012) Using presenting symptoms to revise the “heart-broken index” for the triage of acute myocardial infarction. APSC Subspecialty Congress Intervention and Imaging 2012. Taipei International Convention Center, Taipei, pp 1–78Google Scholar
  10. DeVon HA, Ryan CJ, Ochs AL, Shapiro M (2008) Symptoms across the continuum of acute coronary syndromes: differences between women and men. Am J Crit Care 17(1):14–24Google Scholar
  11. DeVon HA, Ryan CJ, Rankin SH, Cooper BA (2010) Classifying subgroups of patients with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes: a cluster analysis. Res Nurs Health 33(5):386–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diercks DB, Kirk JD, Lindsell CJ et al (2006) Door-to-ECG time in patients with chest pain presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 24:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Divo M, Casanova C, Marin JM, Celli B, de Torres JP, Polverino F et al (2016) Identification of clinical phenotypes in patients with and without COPD using cluster analysis. Eur Respir J 48(suppl 60):4613Google Scholar
  14. Fournier JA, Sanchez A, Quero J, Fernandez-Cortacero JAP, González-Barrero A (1996) Myocardial infarction in men aged 40 years or less: a prospective clinical-angiographic study. Clin Cardiol 19:631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goodacre S, Cross E, Arnold J, Angelini K, Capewell S, Nicholl J (2005) The health care burden of acute chest pain. Heart 91(2):229–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Halon DA, Adawi S, Dobrecky-Mery I, Lewis BS (2004) Importance of increasing age on the presentation and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in elderly patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(3):346–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess EP, Brison RJ, Perry JJ et al (2012a) Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med 59:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hess EP, Knoedler MA, Shah ND, Kline JA, Breslin M, Branda ME et al (2012b) The chest pain choice decision aid. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5(3):251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hsu J-C, Chen K-C, Cheng I-N, Li A-H (2011) Using heart broken index to improve the diagnostic accuracy of patient with STEMI and shorten door-to-balloon time on emergency department. American Heart Association 2011 Scientific Sessions, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  21. Hussein AF, Hashim SJ, Aziz AFA, Rokhani FZ, Adnan WAW (2017) A real time ECG data compression scheme for enhanced bluetooth low energy ECG system power consumption. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1–14Google Scholar
  22. Jayes RL, Beshansky JR, D’Agostino RB, Selker HP (1992) Do patients’ coronary risk factor reports predict acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department? A multicenter study. J Clin Epidemiol 45:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Khan NA, Daskalopoulou SS, Karp I, Eisenberg MJ, Pelletier R, Tsadok MA et al (2013) Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients. JAMA Intern Med 173(20):1863–1871Google Scholar
  24. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G et al (2012) Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk. Nature 488(7412):471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY et al (2013) Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(10):1371–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee YF, Hu SC, Lai HL (2013) A comparison of the quality of emergency care for acute coronary syndromes before and after accreditation of emergency medical competency. Tzu Chi Nurs J 12(3):66Google Scholar
  27. Li K-F (2013) Smart home technology for telemedicine and emergency management. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 4:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. López B, Sánchez M, Bragulat E, Jiménez S, Coll-Vinent B, Ortega M et al (2010) Validation of a triage flowchart to rule out acute coronary syndrome. Emerg Med J 28:841–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lunt A, McGhee E, Rees D, Height S, Rafferty G, Thein SL, Greenough A (2016) Cluster analysis and lung function in sickle cell disease. Eur Respir J 48(suppl 60):2234Google Scholar
  30. Maas AHEM, Appelman YEA (2010) Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J 18(12):598–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahr A, Katsahian S, Varet H, Guillevin L, Hagen EC, Höglund P et al (2013) Revisiting the classification of clinical phenotypes of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a cluster analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 72(6):1003–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ et al (2006) Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:2180–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Grady MJ, Muldoon C, Dragone M, Tynan R, O’Hare GM (2010) Towards evolutionary ambient assisted living systems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenfeld AG, Knight EP, Steffen A, Burke L, Daya M, Devon HA (2015) Symptom clusters in patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome differ by sex, age, and discharge diagnosis. Heart Lung J Acute Crit Care 44:368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Gitt AK, Behar S, Battler A, Hasdai D (2004) Sex, age, and clinical presentation of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 25(8):663–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ryan CJ, DeVon HA, Horne R et al (2007) Symptom clusters in acute myocardial infarction: a secondary data analysis. Nurs Res 56(2):72–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schoenenberger AW, Radovanovic D, Stauffer JC, Windecker S, Urban P, Niedermaier G, Plus Investigators AMIS et al (2011) Acute coronary syndromes in young patients: presentation, treatment and outcome. Int J Cardiol 148:300–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Simon EL, Griffin P, Medepalli K et al (2014) Door-to-balloon times from freestanding emergency departments meet ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction reperfusion guidelines. J Emerg Med 46:734–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tungsubutra W, Tresukosol D, Buddhari W, Boonsom W, Sanguanwang S, Srichaiveth B (2007) Acute coronary syndrome in young adults: the Thai ACS Registry. J Med Assoc Thai 90(Suppl 1):81–90Google Scholar
  40. Wang M-H, Lee C-S, Hsieh K-L, Hsu C-Y, Acampora G, Chang C-C (2010) Ontology-based multi-agents for intelligent healthcare. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 1:111–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitson HE, Johnson KS, Sloane R, Cigolle CT, Pieper CF, Landerman L, Hastings SN (2016) Identifying patterns of multimorbidity in older Americans: application of latent class analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 64(8):1668–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organization (2018) The top 20 causes of death. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/estimates/en/index1.html. Accessed 10 April 2018
  43. Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE, Ettinger SM et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non–ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:215–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu J, Platero-Luengo A, Sakurai M, Sugawara A, Gil MA, Yamauchi T et al (2017) Interspecies chimerism with mammalian pluripotent stem cells. Cell 168(3):473–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zarich SW, Sachdeva R, Fishman R et al (2004) Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative in reducing door-to-balloon times in primary angioplasty. J Interv Cardiol 17:191–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementYuan Ze UniversityTaoyuanTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of EmergencyFar Eastern Memorial HospitalNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations