Advertisement

A study on estimation of human personality from location visiting preference

Original Research
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

It is widely believed that human personality and human-preferred locations are closely related. In this paper, a statistical study to determine the relationship between personality and preferred location, quantitatively, was conducted. Human personality can be represented through the big five factor (BFF) model. Human-preferred locations have been determined from a positioning dataset collected by the smartphones and other mobile devices of volunteers. The positioning dataset can be analyzed and clustered into preferred location datasets. Such analysis is composed of two phases. The first phase estimates a human personality from the dataset of human-preferred locations. The second phase shows the effect of human personality on the selection of preferred locations. In each phase, the location and personality data are preprocessed, trained using a back propagation network (BPN), and then validated and studied through a regression analysis. Location clustering, BPN training, and a regression analysis are the major methods used. The results of this paper demonstrate the relationship between personality and preferred location, which can be presented quantitatively. In particular, the estimation of human personality based on favored locations is the key to our research. For example, preference for a home location is highly related with extraversion, and rarely related with conscientiousness.

Keywords

Estimation of personality Human mobility model Personal mobility model Personality factors Big five factors Personality–location relationship Location preference 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to all volunteers who provided their personality and location data for this research.

References

  1. Anable J (2005) Complacent car addicts or aspiring environmentalists? Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport Policy 12(1):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker R, Càceres R, Hanson K, Isaacman S, Loh JM, Martonosi M, Volinsky C (2013) Human mobility characterization from cellular network data. Commun ACM 56(1):74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burbey I (2011) Predicting future locations and arrival times of individuals. Doctoral Thesis, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrus G, Passafaro P, Bonnes M (2008) Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviours: the case of recycling and use of public transportation. J Environ Psychol 28(1):51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christal RE, Tupes EC (1992) Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. J Personal 60(2)Google Scholar
  6. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. J R Stati Soc Ser B (methodological), pp 1–38Google Scholar
  7. Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative “description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. J Personal Soc Psychol 59(6):1216–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi A-L (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453(7196):779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gretzel U, Mitsche N, Hwang Y-H, Fesenmaier DR (2004) Tell me who you are and i will tell you where to go: use of travel personali- ties in destination recommendation systems. Inf Technol Tour 7(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jang TY (2003) Causal relationship among travel mode, activity, and travel patterns. J Transport Eng 129(1):16–22MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. John OP, Donahue EM (1991) The big five inventory: versions 4a and 5b. University of California, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim S, Song H (2014) Predicting human location based on human personality. In: Balandin S, Andreev S, Koucheryavy Y (eds) Internet Things Smart Spaces Next Gener Netw Syst, vol 8638. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 70–81Google Scholar
  13. Kim S, Song HY, Koo HJ (2012) Probabilistically predicting location of human with psychological factors. In: Wseas International conference. proceedings. Recent advances in computer engineering series. WSEAS, Paris, pp 183–188Google Scholar
  14. Kim SY, Koo HJ, Song HY (2016) A study on influence of human personality to location selection. J Ambient Intell Human Comput (accepted for publication) Google Scholar
  15. Kim SY, Song HY (2015) Determination coefficient analysis between personality and location using regression. International conference on sciences, engineering and technology innovations. Bali, ICSETI, pp 265–274Google Scholar
  16. Luger GF (2008) Artificial intelligence: structures and strategies for complex problem solving. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. Pervin LA, John OP (1999) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Poropat AE (2009) A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychol Bull 135(2):322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salleh A, Al-Kalbani MSA, Mastor KA (2010) Testing the five factor personality model in Oman. In: Proc. the wseas international conference on sociology, psychology, philosophy. At Penang: WSEAS, pp. 11–17Google Scholar
  20. Schmitt DP, Allik J, McCrae RR, Benet-Martínez V (2007) The geographic distribution of big five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. J Cross Cult Psychol 38(2):173–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Song C, Qu Z, Blumm N, Barabási A-L (2010) Limits of predictability in human mobility. Science 327(5968):1018–1021MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Song HY (2016) Probabilistic space-time analysis of human mobility patterns. WSEAS Trans Comput 15:222–238Google Scholar
  23. Song HY, Kim SY (2014) Predicting human locations with big five personality and neural network. In: Journal of economics, Vol 2. Business and Management, Petersburg, pp 273–280Google Scholar
  24. Song HY, Lee EB (2015) An analysis of the relationship between human personality and favored location. Afin 2015: The seventh international conference on advances in future internet. Venezia, IARIA, pp 5–10Google Scholar
  25. Specht DF (1990) Probabilistic neural networks. Neural Netw 3(1):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seung Yeon Kim
    • 1
  • Hoon Jung Koo
    • 2
  • Ha Yoon Song
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringHongik UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.College of psychology and ChildHanshin UniversityOsansiKorea

Personalised recommendations