ConfVisExplorer: a literature-based visual analysis system for conference comparison


Given a research field, there are usually multiple conferences with different sizes and characteristics, and not all researchers have equal participations in all those conferences. For a conference organizer, knowing the level of involvements by the researchers in the field will allow them to put effort into broadening the participation and enrich the research scope. For researchers, knowing the different strengths and focuses of those conferences also allows them to enhance the effectiveness of their effort and the visibility of their works. In recent years, analyzing scientific literature by visualization has become a popular topic, but most of them focus only on the overall characteristics of publications such as authors, citations, and topics. This study focuses on the analysis and comparisons of academic conferences. In this paper, we present the Conference Orange, a new visual metaphor for analyzing and comparing the characteristics of multiple conferences. First, we propose an assessment framework to describe the maturity of the conferences. Second, we map the metrics in the framework to different diagrams for visual analysis and comparison. Third, we design and implement ConfVisExplorer, a multi-view interactive visual system that combines these diagrams, which helps users to explore the structure of the conferences and the attributes in context, such as authors and institutions. Finally, we conduct case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of the system.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9


  1. Bergstrom P, Atkinson DC (2009) Augmenting the exploration of digital libraries with web-based visualizations. In: 2009 fourth international conference on digital information management, pp 1–7

  2. Cheon MJ, Grover V, Sabherwal R (1993) The evolution of empirical research in is: a study in is maturity. Inf Manag 24(3):107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chinchilla-Rodríguez Z, Vargas-Quesada B, Hassan-Montero Y, González-Molina A, Moya-Anegón F (2010) New approach to the visualization of international scientific collaboration. Inf Vis 9(4):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cobo MJ, López-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Inf 5(1):146–166

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dork M, Riche NH, Ramos G, Dumais S (2012) Pivotpaths: Strolling through faceted information spaces. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 18(12):2709–2718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dou W, Wang X, Chang R, Ribarsky W (2011) Paralleltopics: a probabilistic approach to exploring document collections. In: 2011 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST), pp 231–240

  7. Elmqvist N, Tsigas P (2007) Citewiz: a tool for the visualization of scientific citation networks. Inf Vis 6(3):215–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ertl’s homepage Thomas (2020). Accessed March 8

  9. Henry N, Goodell H, Elmqvist N, Fekete J-D (2007) 20 years of four hci conferences: a visual exploration. Int J Human-Comput Interact 23(3):239–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang X, Zhang J (2016) A text visualization method for cross-domain research topic mining. J Vis 19(3):561–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jusufi I, Kerren A, Liu J, Zimmer B (2014). Visual exploration of relationships between document clusters. In: 2014 international conference on information visualization theory and applications (IVAPP), pp 195–203

  12. Kang H, Plaisant C, Lee B, Bederson BB (2007) Netlens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. Inf Vis 6(1):18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karuga GG, Lowry PB, Richardson VJ (2007) Assessing the impact of premier information systems research over time. Commun Ais 19(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Keathley-Herring H, Aken EV, Gonzalez-Aleu F, Deschamps F, Letens G, Orlandini PC (2016) Assessing the maturity of a research area: bibliometric review and proposed framework. Scientometrics 109(2):927–951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Neely A (2005) The evolution of performance measurement research: developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(12):1264–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oelke D, Strobelt H, Rohrdantz C, Gurevych I, Deussen O (2014) Comparative exploration of document collections : a visual analytics approach. eurographics 33(3):201–210

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paul-Hus A, Desrochers N, Costas R (2016) Characterization, description, and considerations for the use of funding acknowledgement data in web of science. Scientometrics 108(1):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen Z, Ogawa M, Teoh ST, Ma K-L (2006) Biblioviz: a system for visualizing bibliography information. In: APVis ’06 proceedings of the 2006 Asia-Pacific symposium on information visualisation, vol 60, pp 93–102

  19. Shin M, Soen A, Readshaw BT, Blackburn SM, Whitelaw M, Xie L (2019) Influence flowers of academic entities. In: 2019 IEEE conference on visual analytics science and technology (VAST), pp 1–10

  20. Tyman J, Gruetzmacher GP, Stasko J (2004)Infovisexplorer. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, pp r7–r7. IEEE

  21. vilanova’s homepage A (2020). Accessed March 8

  22. White HD, McCain KW (1998) Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 49(4):327–355

    Google Scholar 

  23. yang’s homepage Jing (2020). Accessed March 8

Download references


This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 61836013, the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. L1924075, the 13th Five-year Informatization Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Grant No. XXH13504.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guihua Shan.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (mp4 185509KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, K., Wang, Y., Yu, M. et al. ConfVisExplorer: a literature-based visual analysis system for conference comparison. J Vis (2020).

Download citation


  • Conference
  • Comparison
  • Visualization
  • Context
  • Scientific literature