Advertisement

Saddle point of separation/attachment and topology transition in laminar juncture flows

  • Bo HuEmail author
  • Hua Zhang
  • Muhammad Yamin Younis
Regular Paper
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Laminar juncture flow is numerically studied to investigate the outermost saddle point of separation/attachment (SS/SA) and the topological transition. The topological transition trends obtained through computational results are in close agreement with the experiments. The outermost topology in the symmetry plane tends to transform from attachment to separation as the obstacle shape bluntness increases or as the ratio of the boundary layer thickness to the maximum width of the obstacle δ/W decreases. A coefficient CS/A based on Lighthill’s volume flow theory is devised to estimate the separation or attachment of the fluid. The newly proposed criterion is applied to the limiting streamlines, very close to the flat surface, in the vicinity of saddle point to decide its topological nature. A single quadrant around the saddle point is considered for detailed theoretical analysis, and its further division into four subzones facilitates the application of the proposed criterion (CS/A) to assess the flow attachment and separation characteristics. The decisive coefficient is successfully applied at various locations with separation/attachment flow configurations and found consistent with the qualitative results.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Separation/attachment Saddle point Topology transition Topological criterion Three-dimensional (3-D) juncture flow 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11372027 and 10872022).

References

  1. Chapman GT (1986) Topological classification of flow separation on three-dimensional bodies. AIAA Paper 86-0485Google Scholar
  2. Chen C, Hung C (1992) Numerical study of juncture flows. AIAA J 30(7):1800–1807CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Coon MD, Tobak M (1995) Experimental study of saddle point of attachment in laminar juncture flow. AIAA J 33(12):2288–2292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foss JF (2004) Surface selections and topological constraint evaluations for flow field analyses. Exp Fluids 37:883–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hu B, Zhang H, Younis MY, Li Y, Raza MS (2015) Experimental investigation on the transition of separation/attachment in steady laminar juncture flows. Exp Fluids 56(4):74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hung C, Sung C, Chen C (1992) Computation of saddle point of attachment. AIAA J 30(6):1561–1569CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Hunt JCR, Abell CJ, Peterka JA, Woo H (1978) Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles: applying topology to flow visualization. J Fluid Mech 86:179–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Le Clainche S, Li JI, Theofilis V, Soria J (2015) Flow around a hemisphere-cylinder at high angle of attack and low Reynolds number. Part I: experimental and numerical investigation. Aero Sci Technol 44:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Le Clainche S, Rodriguez D, Theofilis V, Soria J (2016) Formation of three-dimensional structures in the hemisphere-cylinder. AIAA J 54(12):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lighthill MJ (1963) Boundary layer theory. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar boundary layers. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 45–88Google Scholar
  12. Liu T, Woodiga S, Ma T (2011) Skin friction topology in a region enclosed by penetrable boundary. Exp Fluids 51:1549–1562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Perry AE, Fairlie BD (1974) Critical points in flow patterns. Adv Geophys 18(1):299–315Google Scholar
  14. Rizzetta DP (1994) Numerical simulation of turbulent cylinder juncture flow fields. AIAA J 32(6):1113–1119MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Rodriguez D, Theofilis V (2010) Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability. J Fluid Mech 655:280–305MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Simpson RL (2001) Junction flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:415–443CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Surana A, Grunberg O, Haller G (2006) Exact theory of three-dimensional flow separation. Part 1. Steady separation. J Fluid Mech 564:57–103MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Surana A, Jacobs GB, Haller G (2007) Extraction of separation and attachment surfaces from three-dimensional steady shear flows. AIAA J 45(6):1290–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Surana A, Jacobs GB, Grunberg O, Haller G (2008) An exact theory of three-dimensional fixed separation in unsteady flows. Phys Fluids 20:107101–107122CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Tai T, Walker M (1991) On three-dimensional flow separation criteria. AIAA Paper 91-1740Google Scholar
  21. Tobak M, Peake DJ (1979) Topology of two-dimensional and three-dimensional separated flows. AIAA Paper 79-1480Google Scholar
  22. Visbal MR (1991) Structure of laminar juncture flows. AIAA J 29(8):1273–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong JH, Png EK (2009) Numerical investigation of the wing-body junction vortex using various large Eddy simulation models. AIAA Paper 2009-4159Google Scholar
  24. Wu J, Ma H, Zhou M (2005) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Younis MY, Zhang H, Hu B, Muhammad Z, Mehmood S (2014a) Investigation of different aspects of laminar horseshoe vortex system using PIV. J Mech Sci Technol 28(2):527–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Younis MY, Zhang H, Hu B, Mehmood S (2014b) Topological evolution of laminar juncture flows under different critical parameters. Sci China Technol Sci 57:1342–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Younis MY, Zhang H, Mehmood M, Aslam J (2014c) Topological investigation of unsteady laminar juncture vortex system. In: Proceedings of 2014 11th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2014 Jan 14–18; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 257–262Google Scholar
  28. Zhang H (2005) Structural analysis of separated flows and vortex motion. National Defense Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang H, Hu B, Younis MY, Wang H, Liu Y (2012a) Investigation on existence and evolution of attachment saddle point structure of 3-D separation in juncture flow. In: Proceedings of 2012 9th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2012 Jan 9–12; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 247–253Google Scholar
  30. Zhang H, Younis MY, Hu B, Wang H, Wang X (2012b) Investigation of attachment saddle point structure of 3-D steady separation in laminar juncture flow using PIV. J Vis 15:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhong H, Woodiga S, Wang P, Shang J, Cui X, Wang J, Liu T (2015) Skin-friction topology of wing-body juncture flows. Eur J Mech B Fluid 53:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering MechanicsShijiazhuang Tiedao University (STDU)ShijiazhuangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Innovation Center for Wind Engineering and Wind Energy Technology of Hebei ProvinceShijiazhuangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Ministry-of-Education Key Laboratory of Fluid Mechanics, School of Aeronautical Science and EngineeringBeihang University (BUAA)BeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical EngineeringMirpur University of Science and Technology (MUST)MirpurPakistan

Personalised recommendations