Saddle point of separation/attachment and topology transition in laminar juncture flows
- 32 Downloads
Laminar juncture flow is numerically studied to investigate the outermost saddle point of separation/attachment (SS/SA) and the topological transition. The topological transition trends obtained through computational results are in close agreement with the experiments. The outermost topology in the symmetry plane tends to transform from attachment to separation as the obstacle shape bluntness increases or as the ratio of the boundary layer thickness to the maximum width of the obstacle δ/W decreases. A coefficient CS/A based on Lighthill’s volume flow theory is devised to estimate the separation or attachment of the fluid. The newly proposed criterion is applied to the limiting streamlines, very close to the flat surface, in the vicinity of saddle point to decide its topological nature. A single quadrant around the saddle point is considered for detailed theoretical analysis, and its further division into four subzones facilitates the application of the proposed criterion (CS/A) to assess the flow attachment and separation characteristics. The decisive coefficient is successfully applied at various locations with separation/attachment flow configurations and found consistent with the qualitative results.
KeywordsSeparation/attachment Saddle point Topology transition Topological criterion Three-dimensional (3-D) juncture flow
The project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11372027 and 10872022).
- Chapman GT (1986) Topological classification of flow separation on three-dimensional bodies. AIAA Paper 86-0485Google Scholar
- Lighthill MJ (1963) Boundary layer theory. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar boundary layers. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 45–88Google Scholar
- Perry AE, Fairlie BD (1974) Critical points in flow patterns. Adv Geophys 18(1):299–315Google Scholar
- Tai T, Walker M (1991) On three-dimensional flow separation criteria. AIAA Paper 91-1740Google Scholar
- Tobak M, Peake DJ (1979) Topology of two-dimensional and three-dimensional separated flows. AIAA Paper 79-1480Google Scholar
- Wong JH, Png EK (2009) Numerical investigation of the wing-body junction vortex using various large Eddy simulation models. AIAA Paper 2009-4159Google Scholar
- Wu J, Ma H, Zhou M (2005) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Younis MY, Zhang H, Mehmood M, Aslam J (2014c) Topological investigation of unsteady laminar juncture vortex system. In: Proceedings of 2014 11th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2014 Jan 14–18; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 257–262Google Scholar
- Zhang H (2005) Structural analysis of separated flows and vortex motion. National Defense Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Hu B, Younis MY, Wang H, Liu Y (2012a) Investigation on existence and evolution of attachment saddle point structure of 3-D separation in juncture flow. In: Proceedings of 2012 9th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2012 Jan 9–12; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 247–253Google Scholar