Advertisement

Journal of Visualization

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1031–1041 | Cite as

Quantitative flow visualization in the distributor of a plate-fin heat exchanger

  • Tae-Sik Jeong
  • Jin-ho Yu
  • Dong-Il Lim
  • Hyoung-Bum Kim
Regular Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

The flow distribution and head loss in the distributor of a plate-fin heat exchanger were experimentally investigated using quantitative and qualitative flow visualization methods. The flow distribution and head loss are important parameters related to the thermal performance and economic design of the heat exchangers. The effect of the different distributor angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) and the alignment configuration at the junction in the distributor were studied. The Reynolds number based on the hydraulic diameter was varied from 100 to 1200. Flow visualization using the dye injection and hydrogen bubble methods was applied to capture the qualitative flow structure inside and around the distributor. Digital particle image velocimetry was used to measure the instantaneous velocity fields, and the flow maldistribution was quantified by using the averaged velocity information. The qualitative flow visualization showed the variation of streamwise velocity in the end of the distributor and the existence of the secondary flow at the junction. From the velocity and pressure measurement, we found that the 30° model has the worst flow distribution and the smallest head loss among other models and the 60° model with misaligned configuration has the best flow distribution and the largest head loss.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Flow visualization Particle image velocimetry Flow distribution Plate-fin heat exchanger Head loss 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) under the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A01059272) and the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2018R1A2B6003623).

References

  1. ALPEMA (2010) The standard of the brazed aluminum plate-fin heat exchanger manufacturer’s association. IHS, EnglewoodGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhutta MMA, Hayat N, Bashir MH, Khan AR, Ahmad KN, Khan S (2012) CFD applications in various heat exchangers design: a review. Appl Therm Eng 32:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jain G, Chaudhary S, Gupta PK, Kush PK (2017) Flow maldistribution study in cryogenic counter-flow plate fin heat exchangers. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 171:012014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiao AJ, Zhang R, Jeong SK (2003) Experimental investigation of header configuration on flow maldistribution in plate-fin heat exchanger. Appl Therm Eng 23:1235–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee EC, Kang H, Heo JY, Kim YC, Park JH, Cho SY (2011) Numerical study on the distribution characteristics of aluminum plate-fin heat exchangers according to the distributor aspect ratio. J KSME 35:805–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li Y, Hu Q, Wang W, Xie B, Yu X (2015) Sloshing resistance and gas–liquid distribution performance in the entrance of LNG plate-fin heat exchangers. Appl Therm Eng 82:182–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lim W, Choi K, Moon I (2013) Current status and perspectives of liquefied natural gas (LNG) plant design. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:3065–3088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reneaume JM, Pingaud H, Niclout N (2000) Optimization of plate fin heat exchangers: a continuous formulation. Chem Eng Res Des 78:849–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Shao H, Zhao Q, Liang Z, Wang Y (2018) Numerical investigation on a separated structure shell-and-tube waste heat boiler based on experiment. Int J Heat Mass Transf 117:1006–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shojaeefard MH, Nourbakhsh SD, Zare J (2017) An investigation of the effects of geometry design on refrigerant flow mal-distribution in parallel flow condenser using a hybrid method of finite element approach and CFD simulation. Appl Therm Eng 112:431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tu XC, Wu Y, Kim HB (2018) Improvement of two-phase flow distribution in the header of a plate-fin heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 123:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang S, Li Y, Wen J, Ma Y (2010) Experimental investigation of header configuration on two-phase flow distribution in plate-fin heat exchanger. Int Comm Heat Mass Transf 37(2):116–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang K, Tu XC, Bae CH, Kim HB (2015) Optimal design of porous baffle to improve the flow distribution in the tube-side inlet of a shell and tube heat exchanger. Int J Heat Mass Transf 80:865–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang Z, Li YZ (2003) CFD simulation on inlet configuration of plate-fin heat exchangers. Cryogenics 43:673–678MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea
  2. 2.Research Center for Aircraft Parts TechnologyGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations