Journal of Visualization

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

Development of ultrasonic visualizer for capturing the characteristics of viscoelastic fluids

  • Takahisa Shiratori
  • Yuji Tasaka
  • Yuichi Murai
  • Yasushi Takeda
Regular Paper

Abstract

In the field of rheology, properties of non-Newtonian fluids have been traditionally represented on graphs such as viscosity curves. In this paper, we propose a visualizer to express the fluid properties as visualized fluid motions in a rotating cylinder. To highlight different fluid motions, three patterns of rotation were given to the cylinder: rapid start of constant rotation (spin-up), rapid stop from constant rotation (spin-down), and periodic rotation. Relationships between fluid motion and fluid properties are discussed by comparing velocity profiles for three fluids: silicone oil, yogurt, and a polyacrylamide (PAA) solution. Ultrasonic velocity profiler (UVP) was used to obtain spatio-temporal velocity maps. The velocity maps reflect essential rheological properties, such as shear thinning, yield stress, and elasticity. Two additional display modes are proposed to explore fluid motions due to viscoelasticity of the PAA solution and yogurt: a grid deformation field and a shear rate field. These two visualizations can provide intuitive understanding of viscoelasticity because deformation and shear rate determine elastic and viscous stresses, respectively. In spin-down tests, the recovery of deformed grids, which is caused by elasticity, can be explicitly observed. Further, the shear rate distributions indicate that kinetic energy of the fluid dissipates near the lateral wall right after the wall stops rotating. In short, these two quantity fields visualize energy conversion among kinetic, elastic, and thermal energy; such energy conversions are characteristic of viscoelastic fluids.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Ultrasonic velocity profiler (UVP) Property visualization Viscoelasticity Shear thinning Rheology 

References

  1. Bauer D, Chaves H, Arcoumanis C (2012) Measurements of void fraction distribution in cavitating pipe flow using X-ray CT. Meas Sci Technol 23:055302. doi:10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/055302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkhofer BH, Jeelani SAK, Windhab EJ, Ouriev B, Linsner KJ, Braun P, Zeng Y (2008) Monitoring of fat crystallization process using UVP–PD technique. Flow Meas Instrum 19:163–169. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Geiger AB, Tsukada A, Lehmann E, Vontobel P, Wokaun A, Scherer GG (2002) In situ investigation of two-phase flow patterns in flow fields of PEFC’s using neutron radiography. Fuel Cells 2:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kotze R, Wiklund J, Haldenwang R (2012) Optimization of the UVP plus PD rheometric method for flow behavior monitoring of industrial fluid suspensions. Appl Rheol 22:42760. doi:10.3933/ApplRheol-22-42760 Google Scholar
  5. Lee SJ, Kim GB, Yim DH, Jung SY (2009) Development of a compact X-ray particle image velocimetry for measuring opaque flows. Rev Sci Instrum 80:033706. doi:10.1063/1.3103644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Murai Y, Tasaka Y, Nambu Y, Takeda Y, Gonzalez SR (2010) Ultrasonic detection of moving interfaces in gas–liquid two-phase flow. Flow Meas Instrum 21:356–366. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2010.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ouriev B, Windhab EJ (2002) Rheological study of concentrated suspensions in pressure-driven shear flow using a novel in-line ultrasound Doppler method. Exp Fluids 32:204–211. doi:10.1007/s003480100345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sinton SW, Chow AW, Iwamiya JH (1994) NMR imaging as a new tool for rheology. Macromol Symposia 86:299–309. doi:10.1002/masy.19940860123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Takeda Y (ed) (2012) Ultrasonic Doppler velocity profiler for fluid flow. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  10. Wiklund J, Standing M (2008) Application of in-line ultrasound Doppler-based UVP-PD rheometry method to concentrated model and industrial suspensions. Flow Meas Instrum 19:171–179. doi:10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2007.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wiklund J, Standing M, Trägårdh C (2010) Monitoring liquid displacement of model and industrial fluids in pipes by in-line ultrasonic rheometry. J Food Eng 99:330–337. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wiklund J, Standing M, Pettersson AJ, Rasmuson A (2006) A comparative study of UVP and LDA Techniques for pulp suspensions in pipe flow. AIChE J 52:484–495. doi:10.1002/aic.10653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yanagisawa T, Yamagishi Y, Hamano Y, Tasaka Y, Yano K, Takahashi J, Takeda Y (2010) Detailed investigation of thermal convection in a liquid metal under a horizontal magnetic field. Phys Rev E 82:056306. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.82.056306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zheng H, Liu L, Williams L, Hertzberg JR, Lanning C, Shandas R (2006) Real time multicomponent echo particle image velocimetry technique for opaque flow imaging. Appl Phys Lett 88:261915. doi:10.1063/1.2216875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Visualization Society of Japan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takahisa Shiratori
    • 1
  • Yuji Tasaka
    • 1
  • Yuichi Murai
    • 1
  • Yasushi Takeda
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Institute of Food, Nutrition and Health, ETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations