Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Qualitative Evaluation and Economic Assessment of Dal-Lake Aquatic Weed Vermicompost Prepared in Conventional Vermi Bed and Smart Vermicomposting Bin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study emphasized in understanding the dynamics of vermicomposting in conventional vermi-bed and smart vermicomposting bin using Dal Lake aquatic weed as substrate with turning frequency of 10 days and 20 days and 20, 40 and 60 days degradation period. In vermi-bed method, the materials were turned manually and a spiral mixer was used in smart vermicomposting bin. The results showed that pH, organic carbon and C:N ratio dwindled by 3.28%, 16.36% and 5.57% and there was an increase in EC by 22.39%, N 14.03%, P 37.78% and K 5.85% with 10 days turning frequency in vermi-bed vermicomposting system. In 20 days turning frequency, the values were 3.02, 22.58, 13.96, 42.86, 6.92 and 11.81%, respectively. When the Dal Lake aquatic weed was degraded in smart vermicomposting bin, it was observed that pH, organic carbon and C:N ratio shrunk by 5.63%, 14.94% and 24.88% with an increase in 11.23% N, 26% P, 10.4% K in 10 days turning frequency and 60 days degradation period. In 20 days turning interval, the values recorded were 6.23, 14.29, 24.56, 10.99, 20 and 16.77%, respectively. The cost of preparation of 1 kg of vermicompost was 20 and 13 Indian Rupees in vermi-bed and smart vermicomposting bin. The benefit cost ratio of smart vermicomposting bin was higher (1.78) than vermi-bed process in the second year. The study can help to shift from conventional to smart vermicomposting system to automate the system, reduce the dependence on manual labour and achieve the dream of organic agriculture.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Enquiries about data availability should be directed to the authors.

References

  1. Muzamil, M., Rasool, S., Masoodi, H.M.: Insitu and exsitu agricultural waste management system. In: Agricultural waste-new insights. IntechOpen, London (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devi, C., Khwairakpam, M.: Weed biomass: bioconversion through composting followed by vermicomposting to optimize time required. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 21, 101326 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2022.101326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, A., Muzamil, M., Dixit, J.: Smart vermicomposting bin for rapid transformation of Dal Lake aquatic weed into fortified vermicompost. Int. J. Recycl. Waste Agric. 12(2), 221–233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2022.1955835.1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Najar, I.A., Khan, A.B.: Vermicomposting of invasive species Azolla pinnata with Eisenia foetida. The Bioscan. Int. Q. J. Life Sci. 5(2), 239–241 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar, S.: Aquatic weeds problems and management in India. Indian J. Weed Sci. 43(3–4), 118–138 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F.L.: Wastewater engineering-treatment, disposal and reuse, p. 1334. Tata MCGraw Hill, New Delhi (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Najar, I.A.: Studies on earthworm communities of Kashmir valley, their application in management of fresh water weeds (macrophytes) and use of vermicompost in horticulture. Pondicherry Central University, Pondicherry (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lim, S.L., Lee, L.H., Wu, T.Y.: Sustainability of using composting and vermicomposting technologies for organic solid waste biotransformation: recent overview, greenhouse gases emissions and economic analysis. J. Clean Prod. 111, 262–278 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Waleed, S.A.: Cow manure composting by microbial treatment for using as potting material: an overview. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 19, 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma, A., Ganguly, R., Gupta, A.K.: Characterization and energy generation potential of municipal solid waste from nonengineered landfill sites in Himachal Pradesh, India. J. Hazard. Toxic. Radioact. Waste 23(4), 04019008 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong, S.H., Griffiths, D.A.: Vermicomposting in the management of pig-waste in Hong Kong. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 7, 593–595 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gajalakshmi, S., Ramasamy, E.V., Abbasi, S.A.: Potential of two epigeic and two anecic earthworm species in vermicomposting of water hyacinth. Bioresour. Technol. 76, 177–181 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Munnoli, P.M., Da-Silva, J.A.T., Saroj, B.: Dynamics of the soil-earthworm-plant relationship: a review. Dyn. Soil Dyn. Plant 4(1), 1–21 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yingkai, L., Yang, X., Gao, W., Qiu, J., Yinsheng, L.: Comparative study of vermicomposting of garden waste and cow dung using Eisenia fetida. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 9646–9657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07667-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, S.L., Wu, T.Y., Lim, P.N., Shak, K.P.Y.: The use of vermicompost in organic farming: overview, effects on soil and economics. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95, 1143–1156 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chauhan, H.K., Singh, K.: Effect of tertiary combinations of animal dung with agrowastes on the growth and development of earthworm Eisenia fetida during organic waste management. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Agric. 2, 11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gong, X., Suyan, L., Chang, S.X., Wu, Q., Cai, L., Sun, X.: Alkyl polyglycoside and earthworm (Eisenia fetida) enhance biodegradation of green waste and its use for growing vegetables. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 167, 459–466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.10.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Muzamil, M., Mani, I., Shukla, L., Lande, S.: Efficiency of pusa compost inoculant along with windrow turner for rapid degradation of paddy straw. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 8(1), 569–576 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hande, A.S., Padole, V.: Design and fabrication of portable organic waste chopping machine to obtain compost. Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Tech. 2(3), 1–8 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-006-8641-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muzamil, M., Rasool, S., Masoodi, H.M., Magray, M., Bangroo, S., Malik, A., Banday, S.: Mechanization in agricultural production from horizontal and vertical perspective. In: Kuden, A. (ed.) Urban horticulture-sustainable gardening in cities. Intech open, London (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ismail, S.A.: The earthworm book, p. 101. India Press, Mapusa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Devi, C., Khwairakpam, M.: Bioconversion of Lantana camara by vermicomposting with two different earthworm species in monoculture. Bioresour. Technol. 296, 122308 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muzamil, M., Mani, I., Kumar, A., Shukla, L.: An engineering intervention to prevent paddy straw burning through in situ microbial degradation. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. A 102, 11–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-020-00490-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson, M.L.: Soil chemical analysis, pp. 123–134. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Subbiah, B.V., Asija, G.L.: A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soil. Curr. Sci. 25, 226–259 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A.: Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate, pp. 1–19. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jackson, M.L.: Soil chemical analysis, p. 498. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Walkley, A., Black, I.A.: An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, B., Chen, Y., Zhang, C., Li, J., Tang, H., Liu, J., Dai, J., Tang, J.: Earthworm biomass and population structure are negatively associated with changes in organic residue nitrogen concentration during vermicomposting. Pedosphere 31(3), 433–439 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muzamil, M., Wani, J., Mustafa, A., Mohiuddin, M., Mir, A., Faisal, S., Nirbhavane, S.: A low cost divergent type apple grader for Kashmiri apples. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7, 3561–3569 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sridevi, S., Prabu, M., Tamilselvi, N.G.: Bioconversion of water hyacinth into enriched vermicompost and its effect on growth and yield of peanut. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 5(9), 675–681 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fu, X., Huang, K., Chen, X., Li, F., Cui, G.: Feasibility of vermistabilization for fresh pelletized dewatered sludge with earthworms Bimastus Parvus. Bioresour. Technol. 175, 646–650 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma, K., Garg, V.K.: Comparative analysis of vermicompost quality produced from rice straw and paper waste employing earthworm Eisenia fetida (Sav). Bioresour. Technol. 250, 708–715 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang, G.F.: Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Manag. 24(8), 805–813 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Anakaram, S.R., Mushan, L.C., Rao, K.R.: Management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), an aquatic weed waste, by vermicomposting technology. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 15(3–6), 195–207 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Viveka, S., Grace, L.B.: Utilization of weeds as substrates for vermifertilizer. Dyn. Soil Dyn. Plant 5(1), 83–86 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lazcano, C., Gómez-Brandón, M., Domínguez, J.: Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere 72, 1013–1019 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, J., Lu, Z., Yang, J., Xing, M., Yu, F., Guo, M.: Effect of earthworms on the performance and microbial communities of excess sludge treatment process in vermifilter. Bioresour. Technol. 117, 214–221 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sehar, T., Zargar, M.Y., Baba, Z.A.: Physical properties of vermicompost produced by locally isolated earthworms from temperate Kashmir region. Int. J. Curr. Res. 7(12), 23982–23987 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ghosh, M., Chattopadhyay, G.N., Baral, K.: Transformation of phosphorous during vermicomposting. Bioresour. Technol. 69, 149–154 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Padmavathiamma, P.K., Li, L.Y., Kumari, U.R.: An experimental study of vermibiowaste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresour. Technol. 99(6), 1672–1681 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Swarnam, T.P., Velmurugan, A., Pandey, S.K., Dam, R.S.: Enhancing nutrient recovery and compost maturity of coconut husk by vermicomposting technology. Bioresour. Technol. 207, 76–84 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yuvaraj, A., Karmegamb, N., Thangaraja, R.: Vermistabilization of paper mill sludge by an epigeic earthworm Perionyx excavatus: Mitigation strategies for sustainable environmental management. Ecol. Eng. 120, 187–197 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ansari, A.A., Jaikishun, S.: Vermicomposting of sugarcane bagasse and rice straw and its impact on the cultivation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in Guyana, South America. J. Agric. Technol. 7(2), 225–234 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sharma, A., Ganguly, R., Gupta, A.K.: Spectral characterization and quality assessment of organic compost for agricultural purposes. Int. J. Recycl. Org. Waste Agric. 8, 197–213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-018-0233-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Elvira, C., Sampedro, L., Benitez, E., Nogales, R.: Vermicomposting of sludges from paper mill and dairy industries with Eisenia Endrei: a pilot scale study. Bioresour. Technol. 63, 205–211 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Garg, V.K., Kaushik, P.: Vermistablization of textile mill sludge spiked with poultry droppings by epigecic earthworm Eisenia fetida. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 1063–1071 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nath, G., Singh, K., Singh, D.K.: Chemical analysis of vermicomposts/vermiwash of different combinations of animal, agro and kitchen wastes. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 3(4), 3672–3676 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Suthar, S.: Bioconversion of post-harvest crop residues and cattle shed manure into value-added products using earthworms Eudrilus eugeniae. Ecol. Eng. 32, 206–214 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vig, A.P., Singh, J., Wani, S.H., Dhaliwal, S.: Vermicomposting of tannery sludge mixed with cattle dung into valuable manure using earthworm Eisenia fetida (Savigny). Bioresour. Technol. 102, 7941–7945 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledge the help rendered by the staff members of college of agricultural engineering and technology, SKUAST-K that led to the completion of this research activity.

Funding

The research was a part of academic programme. The authors declare that no funds, grant or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript or study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally in the experimental design, analysis and preparation of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Muzamil.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Muzamil, M., Rashid, S. et al. Qualitative Evaluation and Economic Assessment of Dal-Lake Aquatic Weed Vermicompost Prepared in Conventional Vermi Bed and Smart Vermicomposting Bin. Waste Biomass Valor 15, 3187–3197 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02335-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02335-w

Keywords

Navigation