Abstract
Modelling and optimization of production of different renewable energy sources are receiving great interest by researchers; as they are used to provide gross information on the possibilities of harnessing energy from variety of resources. Spent tea waste (STW) is one of the potential organic wastes remarkably available in India. In this research work, possibility of producing biogas by co-digesting STW with cow manure (CM) was predicted through a novel fuzzy regression approach. Triangular membership functions with five levels were considered for the fuzzy subsets and a Mamdani-type of fuzzy approach was used to implement a total of 125 rules in the IF–THEN format. The digestion time, carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio and pH were considered as input parameters, while the biogas yield was considered as an output. Experimental data obtained from the lab scale reactors were used to predict the biogas yield using fuzzy logic methodology. The obtained results were validated with the experimental results by carrying out a regression analysis. The results indicated that a good agreement found between experimental and predicted data with a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.994.
Graphic Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- Ai :
-
Actual values
- AARE:
-
Absolute average relative error
- ANFIS:
-
Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
- ANN:
-
Artificial neural network
- AR:
-
Anaerobic reactor
- ARE:
-
Average relative error
- CM:
-
Cow manure
- C/N:
-
Carbon to nitrogen ratio
- FA:
-
Firely algorithm
- FIS:
-
Fuzzy inference system
- GA:
-
Genetic algorithm
- kg:
-
Kilogram
- ml:
-
Millilitre
- MSE:
-
Mean squared normalised error
- NH3 :
-
Ammonia
- Pi :
-
Predicted values
- RF:
-
Random forest
- RMSE:
-
Root mean squared error
- RPM:
-
Revolutions per minute
- RSM:
-
Response surface methodology
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- STW:
-
Spent tea waste
- TS:
-
Total solid
References
Khayum, N., Anbarasu, S., Murugan, S.: Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure. Energy. 165, 760–768 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2018.09.163
Sun, C., Cao, W., Banks, C.J., Heaven, S., Liu, R.: Biogas production from undiluted chicken manure and maize silage: a study of ammonia inhibition in high solids anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 218, 1215–1223 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.07.082
Glanpracha, N., Annachhatre, A.P.: Anaerobic co-digestion of cyanide containing cassava pulp with pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 214, 112–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.04.079
Raheman, H., Mondal, S.: Biogas production potential of jatropha seed cake. Biomass Bioenergy 37, 25–30 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2011.12.042
Dai, X., Li, X., Zhang, D., Chen, Y., Dai, L.: Simultaneous enhancement of methane production and methane content in biogas from waste activated sludge and perennial ryegrass anaerobic co-digestion: The effects of pH and C/N ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 216, 323–330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.05.100
Okeh, O.C., Onwosi, C.O., Odibo, F.J.C.: Biogas production from rice husks generated from various rice mills in Ebonyi State. Nigeria. Renew. Energy. 62, 204–208 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2013.07.006
Haider, M.R., Zeshan, Yousaf, S., Malik, R.N., Visvanathan, C.: Effect of mixing ratio of food waste and rice husk co-digestion and substrate to inoculum ratio on biogas production. Bioresour. Technol. 190, 451–457 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.105
Uçkun Kiran, E., Stamatelatou, K., Antonopoulou, G., Lyberatos, G.: Production of biogas via anaerobic digestion. Handb. Biofuels Prod. 259–301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100455-5.00010-2
Arumugam, T., Parthiban, L., Rangasamy, P.: Two-phase anaerobic digestion model of a tannery solid waste: experimental investigation and modeling with ANFIS. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 40, 279–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1408-9
Ruan, J., Chen, X., Huang, M., Zhang, T.: Application of fuzzy neural networks for modeling of biodegradation and biogas production in a full-scale internal circulation anaerobic reactor. J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 52, 7–14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2016.1221216
Waewsak, C., Nopharatana, A., Chaiprasert, P.: Neural-fuzzy control system application for monitoring process response and control of anaerobic hybrid reactor in wastewater treatment and biogas production. J. Environ. Sci. 22, 1883–1890 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60334-X
Flores-Asis, R., Méndez-Contreras, J.M., Alvarado-Lassman, A., Fernández-Lambert, G., Villanueva-Vásquez, D., Aguilar-Lasserre, A.A.: Analysis of the behavior for operation parameters in the anaerobic digestion process with thermal pretreatment, using fuzzy logic. J. Environ. Sci. Health., Part A 54, 592–602 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1593010
Ghaedi, M., Hosaininia, R., Ghaedi, A.M., Vafaei, A., Taghizadeh, F.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model for adsorption of 1,3,4-thiadiazole-2,5-dithiol onto gold nanoparticales-activated carbon. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 131, 606–614 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAA.2014.03.055
Asl, S.H., Ahmadi, M., Ghiasvand, M., Tardast, A., Katal, R.: Artificial neural network (ANN) approach for modeling of Cr(VI) adsorption from aqueous solution by zeolite prepared from raw fly ash (ZFA). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 19, 1044–1055 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2012.12.001
Turkdogan-Aydınol, F.I., Yetilmezsoy, K.: A fuzzy-logic-based model to predict biogas and methane production rates in a pilot-scale mesophilic UASB reactor treating molasses wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 182, 460–471 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2010.06.054
Jha, S.K., Ahmad, Z., Crowley, D.E.: Fuzzy inference for soil microbial dynamics modeling in fluctuating ecological situations. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35, 1399–1406 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-169682
Jha, S.K., Ahmad, Z., Crowley, D.E.: Fuzzy-genetic approaches for estimation of microbial rock phosphate solubilization in sandy clay loam textured soil. Comput. Electron. Agric. 150, 125–133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPAG.2018.04.014
Zareei, S., Khodaei, J.: Modeling and optimization of biogas production from cow manure and maize straw using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Renew. Energy. 114, 423–427 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2017.07.050
Hajati, S., Ghaedi, M., Mazaheri, H.: Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by walnut carbon: optimization using response surface methodology. Desalin. Water Treat. 57, 3179–3193 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.981217
Beltramo, T., Ranzan, C., Hinrichs, J., Hitzmann, B.: Artificial neural network prediction of the biogas flow rate optimised with an ant colony algorithm. Biosyst. Eng. 143, 68–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOSYSTEMSENG.2016.01.006
Santoso, H., Tani, H., Wang, X.: Random Forest classification model of basal stem rot disease caused by Ganoderma boninense in oil palm plantations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 4683–4699 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1331474
Oloko-Oba, M.I., Taiwo, A.E., Ajala, S.O., Solomon, B.O., Betiku, E.: Performance evaluation of three different-shaped bio-digesters for biogas production and optimization by artificial neural network integrated with genetic algorithm. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 26, 116–124 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.10.006
Bendu, H., Deepak, B.B.V.L., Murugan, S.: Application of GRNN for the prediction of performance and exhaust emissions in HCCI engine using ethanol. Energy Convers. Manag. 122, 165–173 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2016.05.061
Rao, B.B., Raju, V.R., Deepak, B.B.V.L.: Estimation and optimization of heat transfer and overall pressure drop for a shell and tube heat exchanger. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 31, 375–383 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-1239-6
Varne, A.L., Macwan, J.E.M.: Journal of environmental research and development. Global Earth Society for Environmental Energy and Development (2012)
Saha, M., Eskicioglu, C., Sadiq, R.: A fuzzy rule-based approach for modelling effects of bench-scale microwave pre-treatment on solubilisation and anaerobic digestion of secondary sludge. Int. J. Environ. Eng. 6, 183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEE.2014.062156
Robles, A., Latrille, E., Ruano, M.V., Steyer, J.P.: A fuzzy-logic-based controller for methane production in anaerobic fixed-film reactors. Environ. Technol. 38, 42–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1184321
Metternicht, G., Gonzalez, S.: FUERO: foundations of a fuzzy exploratory model for soil erosion hazard prediction. Environ. Model. Softw. 20, 715–728 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENVSOFT.2004.03.015
Gharibi, H., Mahvi, A.H., Nabizadeh, R., Arabalibeik, H., Yunesian, M., Sowlat, M.H.: A novel approach in water quality assessment based on fuzzy logic. J. Environ. Manag. 112, 87–95 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2012.07.007
FAO in India|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, http://www.fao.org/india/en/
Zadeh, L.A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. SMC-3, 28–44 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1973.5408575
Topçu, İ.B., Sarıdemir, M.: Prediction of rubberized concrete properties using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Constr. Build. Mater. 22, 532–540 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2006.11.007
Javadian, H., Ghasemi, M., Ruiz, M., Sastre, A.M., Asl, S.M.H., Masomi, M.: Fuzzy logic modeling of Pb(II) sorption onto mesoporous NiO/ZnCl2-Rosa Canina-L seeds activated carbon nanocomposite prepared by ultrasound-assisted co-precipitation technique. Ultrason. Sonochem. 40, 748–762 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2017.08.022
Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. SMC-15, 116–132 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1985.6313399
Acaroglu, O., Ozdemir, L., Asbury, B.: A fuzzy logic model to predict specific energy requirement for TBM performance prediction. Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. 23, 600–608 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TUST.2007.11.003
Atanassov, K.: Type-1 Fuzzy sets and Intuitionistic Fuzzy sets. Algorithms. 10, 106 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/a10030106
Alvarez Grima, M., Babuška, R.: Fuzzy model for the prediction of unconfined compressive strength of rock samples. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 36, 339–349 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(99)00007-8
Keshwani, D.R., Jones, D.D., Meyer, G.E., Brand, R.M.: Rule-based Mamdani-type fuzzy modeling of skin permeability. Appl. Soft Comput. 8, 285–294 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2007.01.007
Barik, D., Murugan, S.: An artificial neural network and genetic algorithm optimized model for biogas production from co-digestion of seed cake of karanja and cattle dung. Waste Biomass Valorization 6, 1015–1027 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9392-1
Chandra, R., Vijay, V.K., Subbarao, P.M.V., Khura, T.K.: Production of methane from anaerobic digestion of jatropha and pongamia oil cakes. Appl. Energy 93, 148–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2010.10.049
Mshandete, A., Kivaisi, A., Rubindamayugi, M., Mattiasson, B.: Anaerobic batch co-digestion of sisal pulp and fish wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 95, 19–24 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2004.01.011
Bhatnagar, N., Ryan, D., Murphy, R., Enright, A.M.: Effect of co-digestion ratio and enzyme treatment on biogas production from grass silage and chicken litter. Waste Biomass Valorization (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0377-8
Zahedi, S., Romero-Güiza, M., Icaran, P., Yuan, Z., Pijuan, M.: Optimization of free nitrous acid pre-treatment on waste activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 252, 216–220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2017.12.090
Barik, D., Murugan, S.: Assessment of sustainable biogas production from de-oiled seed cake of karanja-an organic industrial waste from biodiesel industries. Fuel 148, 25–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2015.01.072
Akkaya, E., Demir, A., Varank, G.: Estimation of Biogas Generation from a Uasb Reactor via Multiple Regression Model. Int. J. Green Energy 12, 185–189 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2011.651754
Antwi, P., Li, J., Boadi, P.O., Meng, J., Shi, E., Deng, K., Bondinuba, F.K.: Estimation of biogas and methane yields in an UASB treating potato starch processing wastewater with backpropagation artificial neural network. Bioresour. Technol. 228, 106–115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2016.12.045
Dandikas, V., Heuwinkel, H., Lichti, F., Drewes, J.E., Koch, K.: Predicting methane yield by linear regression models: a validation study for grassland biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 265, 372–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIORTECH.2018.06.030
Jena, S.P., Mishra, S., Acharya, S.K., Mishra, S.K.: An experimental approach to produce biogas from semi dried banana leaves. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 19, 173–178 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2017.01.001
Combined effect of fuel injection timing and nozzle opening pressure of a biogas-biodiesel fuelled diesel engine
Rasi, S., Veijanen, A., Rintala, J.: Trace compounds of biogas from different biogas production plants. Energy 32, 1375–1380 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.018
Guo, W., Li, Y., Zhao, K., Xu, Q., Jiang, H., Zhou, H.: Performance and microbial community analysis of anaerobic digestion of vinegar residue with adding of acetylene black or hydrochar. Waste Biomass Valorization (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00664-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khayum, N., Rout, A., Deepak, B.B.V.L. et al. Application of Fuzzy Regression Analysis in Predicting the Performance of the Anaerobic Reactor Co-digesting Spent Tea Waste with Cow Manure. Waste Biomass Valor 11, 5665–5678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00874-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-019-00874-9