Skip to main content
Log in

An Integrated Process of Value Addition to Citrus Waste and Performance of Fenton Process for Its Conversion to Biogas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Citrus fruits are commercially important fruit crop all over the world. About 50–60% of citrus fruit is considered waste including peels and its handling is costly at municipal and industry levels. Citrus wastes in general show a low pH (3–4), relatively high water content and organic matter. Its composting is not recommended, as it has inherent low pH and presence of high concentration of limonene in essential oils that slow down its biological decomposition due to inhibitory activity. Anaerobic digestion for biogas production seems to be a technically sustainable way to valorise by suitable pre-treatment methods. Present study shows extraction of essential oil in minimum requirement of water (1:1 w/v) for hydro-distillation that yields about 2% essential oil from fresh peels. Further, pre-treatment of left over de-oiled biomass with of 30% Fenton’s reagent treatment show biogas and methane production up to 322.63 ml biogas/g VS feed and 122.48 ml methane/g VS feed, respectively under mesophilic condition which is superior to conventional treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma, K., Mahato, N., Cho, M.H., Lee, Y.R.: Converting citrus wastes into value-added products: economic and environmentally friendly approaches. Nutrition. 34, 29–46 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Horticulture Board (NBH): Horticultural Statistics at a Glance 2015. http://nhb.gov.in/area-pro/horst_galance_2016.pdf. NRCC Vision-2015. http://www.icar.org.in/Vision%202050%20CCRI,%20Nagpur.pdf

  3. Martin, M.A., Siles, J.A., Chica, A.F., Martin, A.: Biomethanization of orange peel waste. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 8993–8993 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Satari, B., Palhed, J., Karimi, K., Lundin, M., Taherzadeh, M.J., Zamani, A.: Process optimization for citrus waste biorefinery via simultaneous pectin extraction and pre-treatment. Bioresources. 12, 1706–1722 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ma, E., Cervera, Q., Sanchez, G.M.M.: Integrated utilization of orange peel. Bioresour. Technol. 44, 61–63 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calabro, P.S., Pontoni, L., Porqueddu, I., Greco, R., Pirozzi, F., Malpei, F.: Effect of the concentration of essential oil on orange peel waste biomethanization: preliminary batch results. Waste Manag. 48, 440–447 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz, B., Flotats, X.: Citrus essential oils and their influence on the anaerobic digestion process: an overview. Waste Manag. 34, 2063–2079 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunaseelan, V.N.: Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks. Biomass Bioenerg. 26, 389–399 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skiadas, I.V., Gavala, H.N., Lu, J., Ahring, B.K.: Thermal pre-treatment of primary and secondary sludge at 70 degrees C prior to anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 52, 161–166 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elliot, A., Mahmood, T.: Comparison of mechanical pretreatment methods for the enhancement of anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper waste. Water Environ. Res. 84, 497–505 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernstad, A., Malmquist, L., Truedsson, C., Jansen, J.C.: Need for improvements in physical pretreatment of source-separated household food waste. Waste Manag. 33, 746–754 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cesaro, A., Belgiorno, V.: Pretreatment methods to improve anaerobic biodegradability of organic municipal solid waste fractions. Chem. Eng. J. 240, 24–37 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrere, H., Dumas, C., Battimelli, A., Batsone, D.J., Delgenes, J.P., Steyer, J.P., Ferrer, I.: Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. J. Hazard. Mater. 183, 1–15 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sri, B., Kameswari, K., Kalyanaraman, C., Thanasekaran, K.: Effect of ozonation and ultrasonication pretreatment processes on co-digestion of tannery solid wastes. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 13, 517–525 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, H., Li, C., Liu, W., Zou, S.: Optimized alkaline pretreatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 123, 189–194 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barjenbruch, M., Kopplow, O.: Enzymatic, mechanical and thermal pretreatment of surplus sludge. Adv. Environ. Res. 7, 715–720 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Romano, R.T., Zhang, R., Teter, S., McGarvey, J.A.: The effect of enzyme addition on anaerobic digestion of Jose Tall Wheat Grass. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 4564–4571 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lane, A.G.: Pretreatment of citrus peel press liquor before anaerobic digestion. Environ. Technol. Lett. 4, 73–78 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pragadheesh, V.S., Chanotiya, C.S., Rastogi, S., Shasany, A.K.: Phytochemistry scent from Jasminum grandiflorum flowers: investigation of the change in linalool enantiomers at various developmental stages using chemical and molecular methods. Phytochemistry 140, 83–94 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Michalska, K., Miazek, K., Krzystek, L., Ledakowicz, S.: Influence of pretreatment with Fenton’s reagent on biogas production and methane yield from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 119, 72–78 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mcintosh, S., Vancov, T.: Enhanced enzyme saccharification of sorghum bicolor straw using dilute alkali pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 6718–6727 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, D.P., Trivedi, R.K.: Acid and alkaline pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass to produce ethanol as biofuel. Int. J. ChemTech Res. 5, 727–734 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. American Public Health Association (APHA): Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st edn. Port City Press, Washington, DC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nopharatana, A., Pullammanappalli, P.C., Clarke, W.P.: Kinetics and dynamic modeling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Manag. 27, 595–603 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kusuma, H.S., Putra, A.F.P., Mahfud, M.: Comparison of two isolation methods for essential oils from orange peel (Citrus aurantium L) as a growth promoter for fish: microwave steam distillation and conventional steam distillation. J. Aquat. Res. Dev. 7, 409 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wikandari, R., Nguyen, H., Millati, R., Niklasson, C., Taherzadeh, M.J.: Improvement of biogas production from orange peel waste by leaching of limonene. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, Article ID 494182 (2015)

  27. Forgacs, G., Pourbafrani, M., Niklasson, C., Taherzadeh, M.J., Hovath, I.S.: Methane production from citrus wastes: process development and cost estimation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 87, 250–255 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Forgacs, G.: Biogas production from citrus wastes and chicken feather: pretreatment and co-digestion [Ph. D. Thesis], Chalmers University of Technology at Goteborg, Sweden (2012)

  29. Wang, L., Mattsson, M., Rundstedt, J., Karlsson, N.: Different pretreatments to enhance biogas production [Master of Science Thesis]. Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden (2011)

  30. Mert, B.K., Yonar, T., Kilic, M.Y., Kestioglu, K.: Pre-treatment studies on olive oil mill effluent using physicochemical, Fenton and Fenton-like oxidations processes. J. Hazard. Mater. 174, 122–128 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dewil, R., Appels, L., Baeyens, J., Degrève, J.: Peroxidation enhances the biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of biosolids. J. Hazard. Mater. 146, 577–581 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. El-Gohary, F.A., Badawy, M.I., El-Khateeb, M.A., El-Kalliny, A.S.: Integrated treatment of olive mill wastewater (OMW) by combination of Fenton’s reaction and anaerobic treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 162, 1536–1541 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, H., Tian, Y., Wang, L., Mi, X., Chai, Y.: Effect of ferrous chloride on biogas production and enzymatic activities during anaerobic fermentation of cow dung and Phragmites straw. Biodegradation. 27, 69–82 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Director, CSIR-NEERI, Nagpur and Director, CSIR-CIMAP, Lucknow for providing laboratory and facility for GC-TCD and GC–MS analysis. This has CSIR-NEERI Communication No. CSIR-NEERI/KRC/2017/NOV/EBGD/2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjog T. Thul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magare, M.E., Sahu, N., Kanade, G.S. et al. An Integrated Process of Value Addition to Citrus Waste and Performance of Fenton Process for Its Conversion to Biogas. Waste Biomass Valor 11, 165–172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0385-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0385-8

Keywords

Navigation