Valorization of Arid Region Abattoir Animal Waste: Determination of Biomethane Potential
- 15 Downloads
Abattoir waste methanization has historically focused on cattle, swine and poultry wastes. The main objective of the present work is the determination of biomethane potential of organic wastes from arid-region, i.e. animal dung: camel, sheep, goat, cattle; and mixed blood waste. Biomethane potential was determined for the five untreated wastes. In addition the investigated wastes were thermally pretreatment at 120 °C for 30 min and the biomethane potentials of the pretreated wastes were in addition determined. The thermal pretreatment increased the biomethane potential by 30–150%, achieving a maximum of 442 ml CH4/g VS for the thermally pretreated mixed blood waste. The results highlight the potential of using abattoir wastes in arid-regions for biomethane production. Two mathematical models, Gompertz, and modified Gompertz, were used to analyze the experimental data and determine the maximum biomethane production rate. The analysis showed that the modified Gompertz model is more accurate than the Gompertz model giving at biomethane production rate up to 56 ml CH4/g VS/day.
KeywordsAbattoir Anaerobic digestion Biomasses arid regions, biomethane potential Pretreatment
The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, to help fulfill the vision of the late President Sheikh Zayed Bin Sultan Al Nahyan for sustainable development and empowerment of the United Arab Emirates and humankind, funding project 2GBIONRG (12KAMA4). The authors would also like to acknowledge Al Wathba ISTP2 Wastewater Treatment Plant (Vebes O & M Co.), Al Mina Automated Slaughter House, and Al Shahama Slaughter House.
- 4.FAO: Coping with Water Scarcity An Action Framework for Agriculture and Food Security. FAO, Rome (2012)Google Scholar
- 5.WB: Middle East and North Africa. http://www.worldbank.org/en/region/mena
- 20.APHA: Standar Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA, New York (1995)Google Scholar
- 21.Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D.: NREL/TP-510-42622 Determination of Ash in Biomass: Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) (2008)Google Scholar
- 22.Sluiter, a, Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Crocker, D.: NREL/TP-510-42618 Analytical Procedure—Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass (2012)Google Scholar
- 23.Sluiter, a, Hames, B., Hyman, D., Payne, C., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Nrel, J.W.: NREL/TP-510-42621 Determination of Total Solids in Biomass and Total Dissolved Solids in Liquid Process Samples (2008)Google Scholar
- 24.ASTM: ASTM E 1690-01 Standard Test Method for Determination of Ethanol Extractives in Biomass (2002)Google Scholar
- 25.Angelidaki, I., Alves, M., Bolzonella, D., Borzacconi, L., Campos, J.L., Guwy, A.J., Kalyuzhnyi, S., Jenicek, P., van Lier, J.B.: Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci. Technol. 59, 927–934 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ortega-Martinez, E., Zaldivar, C., Phillippi, J., Carrere, H., Donoso-Bravo, A.: Improvement of anaerobic digestion of swine slurry by steam explosion and chemical pretreatment application. Assessment based on kinetic analysis. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 4, 2033–2039 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Riggio, S., Torrijos, M., Debord, R., Esposito, G., van Hullebusch, E.D., Steyer, J.P., Escudie, R.: Mesopholic anaerobic digestion of several types of spent livestock bedding in a batch leach-bed reactor: substrate characterization and process performance. Waste Manag. 59, 129–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Pagés-Díaz, J., Pereda-Reyes, I., Taherzadeh, M.J., Sárvári-Horváth, I., Lundin, M.: Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: Synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem. Eng. J. 245, 89–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar