Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 9, Issue 12, pp 2373–2379 | Cite as

Introduction to the Concept of Particleboard Production from Mixtures of Sawdust and Dried Food Waste

  • S. VakalisEmail author
  • K. Moustakas
  • D. Semitekolos
  • J. Novakovic
  • D. Malamis
  • L. Zoumpoulakis
  • M. Loizidou
Original Paper


The promotion of sustainable waste management strategies has been highlighted with the introduction of the Waste Framework Directive, which favors the waste management practices that extend the life-cycle of waste. A significant fraction of municipal solid waste consists from food waste, the treatment of which is done primarily by means of conventional methods like composting and anaerobic digestion. The scope of this manuscript is the production of particleboards from dried food waste, thus reusing the waste and extending significantly their life-cycle. Dried food waste that were gathered from households were mixed with wood on a 1:10 ratio and with an epoxy resin. The mixture was compressed in a hydraulic hot press for the manufacturing of particleboards. The high starch content in the food waste was also an important feature that would assist the adhesion of the particleboards in a concept similar to pelletization. The products had regular structure and compactness, with the density ranging from 645 to 682 kg/m3. The thickness swelling ranged from 18.9 to 19.8% for 24-h experiments, while the water absorption ranged from 65 to 72% for the same time period. Leaching tests, both with deionized water and acetic acid, showed that the leachates had very low concentrations of heavy metals.


Waste valorization Materials from waste Starch Resins Hot pressing 



This work has been developed in the framework of the project “Particleboards from dried food waste” and has been supported by the funding of the IKY-Siemens scholarship with the title “IKY Fellowships of Excellence for Postgraduate Studies in Greece—Siemens Program”.


The funding was provided by State Scholarships Foundation (Grant No. 2016-017-0173-10333).


  1. 1.
    European Council: Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008. Brussels, Belgium (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tatàno, F., Pagliaro, G., Di Giovanni, P., Floriani, E., Mangani, F.: Biowaste home composting: experimental process monitoring and quality control. Waste Manage. 38, 72–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EUROSTAT: Municipal Waste Treated in 2012 by Country and Treatment Category, Sorted by Landfilling (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawai, K., Tasaki, T.: Revisiting estimates of municipal solid waste generation per capita and their reliability. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 18, 1–13 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riber, C., Christensen, T.H.: Method for fractional solid waste sampling and chemical analysis. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 87, 321–336 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gidarakos, E., Havas, G., Ntzamilis, P.: Municipal solid waste composition determination supporting the integrated solid waste management system in the island of Crete. Waste Manage. 26, 668–679 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vakalis, S., Sotiropoulos, A., Moustakas, K., Malamis, D., Vekkos, K., Baratieri, M.: Thermochemical valorization and characterization of household bio-waste. J. Environ. Manage. 203, 648–654 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iacovidou, E., Ohandja, D.G., Voulvoulis, N.: Food waste co-digestion with sewage sludge – realizing its potential in the UK. J. Environ. Manage. 112, 267–274 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farazaki, M., Geronymakis, T., Toursidis, P., Marakas, H., Gikas, P.: Potential for recyclables recovery from the mixed municipal solid waste of the municipality of Lesvos. In Conference Proceedings: 5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Athens, 21st–24th June 2017Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bernstad, A., la Cour Jansen, J.: Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems - current status and potential improvements. Waste Manage. 32, 2439–2455 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eriksson, M., Strid, I., Hansson, P.A.: Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study. J. Clean. Prod. 93, 115–125 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sotiropoulos, A., Malamis, D., Loizidou, M.: Dehydration of domestic food waste at source as an alternative approach for food waste management. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 6, 167–176 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vakalis, S., Moustakas, K., Malamis, D., Loizidou, M.: Introduction to the concept of particleboard production from mixtures of sawdust and dried food waste. In Conference Proceedings: 5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, Athens, 21st–24th June 2017Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vakalis, S., Sotiropoulos, A., Moustakas, K., Malamis, D., Loizidou, M.: Assessing the potential of particleboard production from food waste: analysis of the input materials. Sci. Rev. Chem. Commun. 7, 1–6 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khazaeian, A., Ashori, A., Dizaj, M.Z.: Suitability of sorghum stalk fibers for production of particleboard. Carbohydr. Polym. 120, 15–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Klímek, P., Wimmer, R., Mishra, P.K., Kúdela, J.: Utilizing brewer’s-spent-grain in wood-based particleboard manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 812–817 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hegazy, S.S., Ahmed, K.: Effect of date palm cultivar, particle size, panel density and hot water extraction on particleboards manufactured from date palm fronds. Agriculture 5, 267–285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang, C., Li, D., Zhang, P., Li, J., Wang, J., Yu, J.: Formaldehyde and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from particleboard: identification of odorous compounds and effects of heat treatment. Build. Environ. 117, 118–126 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rudnik, E., Matuschek, G., Milanov, N., Kettrup, A., Thermal stability and degradation of starch derivatives. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 85, 267–270 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Society for Testing and Materials – ASTM: Standard Test Methods for Evaluating Properties of Wood-Base Fiber and Particle Panel Materials: Specification ASTM D 1037-98. ASTM, Philadelphia (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    American Wood Protection Association: AWPA E11-97/Standard Method of Determining the Leachability of Wood Preservatives. American Wood Protection Association, Granbury (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klímek, P., Meinlschmidt, P., Wimmer, R., Plinke, B., Schirp, A.: Using sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), topinambour (Helianthus tuberosus L.) and cup-plant (Silphium perfoliatum L.) stalks as alternative raw materials for particleboards. Ind. Crops Prod. 92, 157–164 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taha, I., Elkafafy, M.S., El Mously, H.: Potential of utilizing tomato stalk as raw material for particleboards. Ain Shams Eng. J. (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xie, W.-Q., Chai, X.-S.: Determination of epoxy groups in epoxy resins by reaction-based headspace gas chromatography. Polym. Testing. 59, 113–117 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, R., Lan, C., Wu, Z., Huang, T., Chen, X., Liao, Y., Ye, L., Lin, X., Yang, Y., Zheng, Y., Xie, Y., Zhuang, Q.: A novel particleboard using unsaturated polyester resin as a formaldehyde-free adhesive. Constr. Build. Mater. 148, 781–788 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vakalis, S., Sotiropoulos, A., Moustakas, K., Malamis, D., Vekkos, K., Baratieri, M.: Characterization of hotel bio-waste by means of simultaneous thermal analysis. Waste Biomass Valoriz. 7, 649–657 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    American National Standard Institute – ANSI: Mat-Formed Wood Particleboard: Specification ANSI A 208.1.1993. National Particleboards Association, Gaithersburg (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    European Committee for Standardization (CEN): EN 317. Particleboards and Fiberboards, Determination of Swelling in Thickness After Immersion. CEN, Brussels (1993)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Copur, Y., Guler, C., Akgul, M., Tascioglu, C.: Some chemical properties of hazelnut husk and its suitability for particleboard production. Build. Environ. 42, 2568–2572 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Melo, R.R.D., Stangerlin, D.M., Santana, R.R.C., Pedrosa, T.D.: Physical and mechanical properties of particleboard manufactured from wood, bamboo and rice husk. Mater. Res. 17, 682–686 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pirayesh, H., Moradpour, P., Sepahvand, S.: Particleboard from wood particles and sycamore leaves: physico-mechanical properties, engineering in agriculture. Environ. Food. 8, 38–43 (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kartal, N.S., Clausen, C.A.: Leachability and decay resistance of particleboard made from acid extracted and bioremediated CCA-treated wood. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation. 47, 183–191 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Materials Science and Engineering Department, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations