Skip to main content
Log in

An Approach to an Insular Self-contained Waste Management System with the Aim of Maximizing Recovery While Limiting Transportation Costs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Waste and Biomass Valorization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is focused on definition of the typology, capacity and location of waste treatment and disposal facilities for use in both present and future management scenarios on the larger Mediterranean islands, using Sicily as a case study. Following estimation of the amount of waste produced in Sicily and the proposal of a pathway aimed at rapidly achieving the 50% recovery target established by the European Union, a series of progressive and alternative scenarios for the management of residual waste have been proposed and analyzed by means of the software platform TransCad in terms of “facility location” and “minimum-cost flow” problems. The cost of transportation was calculated as the sum of different cost components related to distance traveled, staff involved, and vehicle used to collect waste, including fuel costs, tire costs, road tax and truck maintenance costs. The different scenarios were critically compared in terms of transportation costsAnalysis of traffic flows allowed us to ascertain the general framework of increased traffic elicited by the proposed scenarios and assess the impact caused by an increase in “trucks per day” along three critical sections of the road network in Sicily. Overall transportation costs corresponded to approximately 10% of treatment/disposal costs for all scenarios, highlighting therefore how transportation costs should not be over-inflated or used to condition public acceptance as to the location, size and typology of the facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lober, D.J., Green, D.P.: NIMBY or NIABY: a Logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting. J. Environ. Manage. 40(1), 33–50 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tadesse, T.: Environmental concern and its implication to household waste separation and disposal: evidence from Mekelle, Ethiopia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53(4), 183–191 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Achillas, Ch., Vlachokostas, Ch., Moussiopoulos, N., Banias, G., Kafetzopoulos, G., Karagiannidis, A.: Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(9–10), 857–863 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Afullo, A.O.: The applicability of NIMBY and NIMTO syndromes, willingness and ability to pay for improved solid waste management among Nairobi households. J. Solid Waste Technol. Manage. 41(2), 121–135 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V.: Location modeling for municipal solid waste facilities. Comput. Oper. Res. 62, 305–315 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Messineo, A., Volpe, R., Marvuglia, A.: Ligno-cellulosic biomass exploitation for power generation: a case study in sicily. Energy. 45(1), 613–625 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan, M.M.U.H., Jain, S., Vaezi, M., Kumar, A.: Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways. Waste Manage. 48(1), 548–564 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. De Feo, G., De Gisi, S.: Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Manage. 34(11), 2225–2238 (2014)

  9. Zang, B., Luo, Y.M., Zhang, H.Y., Li, G.X., Zhang, F.: Optimization for MSW logistics of new Xicheng and new Dongcheng districts in Beijing based on maximum capacity of transfer stations. J. Mater. Cycl. Waste Manage. 15(4), 449–460 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gbanie, S.P., Tengbe, P.B., Momoh, J.S., Medo, J., Kabba, V.T.S: Modelling landfill location using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone. Appl. Geogr. 36, 3–12 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song, B.D., Morrison, J.R., Ko, Y.D.: Efficient location and allocation strategies for undesirable facilities considering their fundamental properties. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65, 475–484 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V.: A bi-objective model for the location of landfills for municipal solid waste. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235, 187–194 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Farahan, R.Z., Hekmatfar, M., Fahimnia, B., Kazemzadeh, N.: Hierarchical facility location problem: models, classifications, techniques, and applications. Comput. Ind. Eng. 68, 104–117 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bing, X., Bloemhof, J.M., Rodrigues Pereira Ramos, T., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., Wongd, C.Y., van der Vorst, J.G.A.J: Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management. Waste Manage. 48, 584–592 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan, M.U.H., Jain, S., Vaezi, M., Kumar, A.: Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways. Waste Manage. 48, 548–564 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang, N.B., Lin, T.Y.: Economic evaluation of a regionalization program for solid waste management in a Metropolitan Region. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 241–274 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kagawa, S., Nakamurac, S., Inamura, H., Yamadae, M.: Measuring spatial repercussion effects of regional waste management. Resour .Conserv. Recycl. 51, 141–174 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Leao, S., Bishop, I., Evans, D.: Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment. Resour .Conserv. Recycl. 33, 289–313 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leao, S., Bishop, I., Evans, D.: Spatial–temporal model for demand and allocation of waste landfills in growing urban regions. Comput. Environ. Urban. 28, 353–385 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alçada-Almeida, L., Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., Current, J.: A multiobjective modeling approach to locating incinerators. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 43, 111–120 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abediniangerabi, B., Kamalirad, S.: Landfill sitting using MCDM in Tehran metropolitan. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 10(1), 11–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani, 2015. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2015)

  23. Eurostat: Municipal waste by waste operation. Online Database (2017).

  24. ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2008. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2008)

  25. Messineo, A., Panno, D.: Municipal waste management in sicilly: Practicies and challenges. Waste Manage. 28, 1021–1208 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. European Commission: Waste Framework Directive, Directive 2008/98/EC, (2008)

  27. European Commission: The role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy, COM 34, (2017)

  28. Astrup, T.F., Tonini, D., Turconi, R., BoldrinA: Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: review and recommendations. Waste Manage. 37, 104–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grosso, M., Dellavedova, S., Rigamonti, L., Scotti, S.: Case study of an MBT plant producing SRF for cement kiln co-combustion, coupled with a bioreactor landfill for process residues. Waste Manag. 47267-75 (2016)

  30. Rigamonti L., Sterpi I., Grosso M.: Integrated municipal waste management systems: An indicator to assess their environmental and economic sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 60, 1–7 (2016)

  31. Sicilian Region- Regional special office for waste separate collection: (2017): http://www.usrdsicilia.it/usrd/index.php/medie-mensili-percentuali-rd

  32. ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani, 2016. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2016)

  33. European Commission: Reference document on best available techniques in the cement, lime and magnesium oxide manufacturing industries. (2010)

  34. ISWA: Bottom ash from WTE plantsmetal recovery andutilization. Report (2015). http://www.iswa.org (2016)

  35. EEA. Energy efficiency and specific CO2 emissions. European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, p. 14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Seadon, JK.: Sustainablewaste management systems. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1639–1651 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pires, A., Martinho, G., Chang, N.B.: Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 1033–1050 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Mancini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mancini, G., Nicosia, F.G., Luciano, A. et al. An Approach to an Insular Self-contained Waste Management System with the Aim of Maximizing Recovery While Limiting Transportation Costs. Waste Biomass Valor 8, 1617–1627 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9969-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9969-y

Keywords

Navigation