Abstract
This study is focused on definition of the typology, capacity and location of waste treatment and disposal facilities for use in both present and future management scenarios on the larger Mediterranean islands, using Sicily as a case study. Following estimation of the amount of waste produced in Sicily and the proposal of a pathway aimed at rapidly achieving the 50% recovery target established by the European Union, a series of progressive and alternative scenarios for the management of residual waste have been proposed and analyzed by means of the software platform TransCad in terms of “facility location” and “minimum-cost flow” problems. The cost of transportation was calculated as the sum of different cost components related to distance traveled, staff involved, and vehicle used to collect waste, including fuel costs, tire costs, road tax and truck maintenance costs. The different scenarios were critically compared in terms of transportation costsAnalysis of traffic flows allowed us to ascertain the general framework of increased traffic elicited by the proposed scenarios and assess the impact caused by an increase in “trucks per day” along three critical sections of the road network in Sicily. Overall transportation costs corresponded to approximately 10% of treatment/disposal costs for all scenarios, highlighting therefore how transportation costs should not be over-inflated or used to condition public acceptance as to the location, size and typology of the facilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lober, D.J., Green, D.P.: NIMBY or NIABY: a Logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting. J. Environ. Manage. 40(1), 33–50 (1994)
Tadesse, T.: Environmental concern and its implication to household waste separation and disposal: evidence from Mekelle, Ethiopia. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 53(4), 183–191 (2009)
Achillas, Ch., Vlachokostas, Ch., Moussiopoulos, N., Banias, G., Kafetzopoulos, G., Karagiannidis, A.: Social acceptance for the development of a waste-to-energy plant in an urban area. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 55(9–10), 857–863 (2011)
Afullo, A.O.: The applicability of NIMBY and NIMTO syndromes, willingness and ability to pay for improved solid waste management among Nairobi households. J. Solid Waste Technol. Manage. 41(2), 121–135 (2015)
Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V.: Location modeling for municipal solid waste facilities. Comput. Oper. Res. 62, 305–315 (2015)
Messineo, A., Volpe, R., Marvuglia, A.: Ligno-cellulosic biomass exploitation for power generation: a case study in sicily. Energy. 45(1), 613–625 (2012)
Khan, M.M.U.H., Jain, S., Vaezi, M., Kumar, A.: Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways. Waste Manage. 48(1), 548–564 (2016)
De Feo, G., De Gisi, S.: Using MCDA and GIS for hazardous waste landfill siting considering land scarcity for waste disposal. Waste Manage. 34(11), 2225–2238 (2014)
Zang, B., Luo, Y.M., Zhang, H.Y., Li, G.X., Zhang, F.: Optimization for MSW logistics of new Xicheng and new Dongcheng districts in Beijing based on maximum capacity of transfer stations. J. Mater. Cycl. Waste Manage. 15(4), 449–460 (2013)
Gbanie, S.P., Tengbe, P.B., Momoh, J.S., Medo, J., Kabba, V.T.S: Modelling landfill location using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone. Appl. Geogr. 36, 3–12 (2013)
Song, B.D., Morrison, J.R., Ko, Y.D.: Efficient location and allocation strategies for undesirable facilities considering their fundamental properties. Comput. Ind. Eng. 65, 475–484 (2013)
Eiselt, H.A., Marianov, V.: A bi-objective model for the location of landfills for municipal solid waste. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235, 187–194 (2014)
Farahan, R.Z., Hekmatfar, M., Fahimnia, B., Kazemzadeh, N.: Hierarchical facility location problem: models, classifications, techniques, and applications. Comput. Ind. Eng. 68, 104–117 (2014)
Bing, X., Bloemhof, J.M., Rodrigues Pereira Ramos, T., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., Wongd, C.Y., van der Vorst, J.G.A.J: Research challenges in municipal solid waste logistics management. Waste Manage. 48, 584–592 (2016)
Khan, M.U.H., Jain, S., Vaezi, M., Kumar, A.: Development of a decision model for the techno-economic assessment of municipal solid waste utilization pathways. Waste Manage. 48, 548–564 (2016)
Chang, N.B., Lin, T.Y.: Economic evaluation of a regionalization program for solid waste management in a Metropolitan Region. J. Environ. Manage. 51, 241–274 (1997)
Kagawa, S., Nakamurac, S., Inamura, H., Yamadae, M.: Measuring spatial repercussion effects of regional waste management. Resour .Conserv. Recycl. 51, 141–174 (2007)
Leao, S., Bishop, I., Evans, D.: Assessing the demand of solid waste disposal in urban region by urban dynamics modelling in a GIS environment. Resour .Conserv. Recycl. 33, 289–313 (2001)
Leao, S., Bishop, I., Evans, D.: Spatial–temporal model for demand and allocation of waste landfills in growing urban regions. Comput. Environ. Urban. 28, 353–385 (2004)
Alçada-Almeida, L., Coutinho-Rodrigues, J., Current, J.: A multiobjective modeling approach to locating incinerators. Socio Econ. Plan. Sci. 43, 111–120 (2009)
Abediniangerabi, B., Kamalirad, S.: Landfill sitting using MCDM in Tehran metropolitan. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 10(1), 11–24 (2016)
ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani, 2015. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2015)
Eurostat: Municipal waste by waste operation. Online Database (2017).
ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani 2008. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2008)
Messineo, A., Panno, D.: Municipal waste management in sicilly: Practicies and challenges. Waste Manage. 28, 1021–1208 (2008)
European Commission: Waste Framework Directive, Directive 2008/98/EC, (2008)
European Commission: The role of waste-to-energy in the circular economy, COM 34, (2017)
Astrup, T.F., Tonini, D., Turconi, R., BoldrinA: Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: review and recommendations. Waste Manage. 37, 104–115 (2015)
Grosso, M., Dellavedova, S., Rigamonti, L., Scotti, S.: Case study of an MBT plant producing SRF for cement kiln co-combustion, coupled with a bioreactor landfill for process residues. Waste Manag. 47267-75 (2016)
Rigamonti L., Sterpi I., Grosso M.: Integrated municipal waste management systems: An indicator to assess their environmental and economic sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 60, 1–7 (2016)
Sicilian Region- Regional special office for waste separate collection: (2017): http://www.usrdsicilia.it/usrd/index.php/medie-mensili-percentuali-rd
ISPRA: Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani, 2016. http://www.isprambiente.gov.it (2016)
European Commission: Reference document on best available techniques in the cement, lime and magnesium oxide manufacturing industries. (2010)
ISWA: Bottom ash from WTE plantsmetal recovery andutilization. Report (2015). http://www.iswa.org (2016)
EEA. Energy efficiency and specific CO2 emissions. European Environment Agency: Copenhagen, p. 14 (2017)
Seadon, JK.: Sustainablewaste management systems. J. Clean. Prod. 18, 1639–1651 (2010)
Pires, A., Martinho, G., Chang, N.B.: Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis techniques. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 1033–1050 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mancini, G., Nicosia, F.G., Luciano, A. et al. An Approach to an Insular Self-contained Waste Management System with the Aim of Maximizing Recovery While Limiting Transportation Costs. Waste Biomass Valor 8, 1617–1627 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9969-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-017-9969-y