Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 855–864 | Cite as

Industrial Symbiosis Exchanges: Developing a Guideline to Companies

  • Johannes Kjær Madsen
  • Nils Boisen
  • Louise Udsen Nielsen
  • Louise Holmelund TackmannEmail author
Original Paper


Current industrial symbiosis (IS) research focuses to a large extent on either (1) how likely different factors and conditions are to lead to the development of IS exchanges, (2) barriers to IS or (3) on network theories. There is less focus on how to realize actual exchanges between companies. The purpose of this paper is thus to operationalize current theories and knowledge of such IS barriers in order to provide a guideline on realization of IS projects and hereby make the knowledge of the scientific community applicable in the everyday work of companies. The findings of previous IS research are combined with both research on two companies currently in the process of establishing an IS exchange, as well as practitioners working with facilitation of such exchanges. Lastly, the findings and research are combined to determine what should be the content of a guideline on IS, so that it provides motivated companies with knowledge on potential barriers and opportunities in a way that is directly applicable to their everyday work. The study shows that important barriers for realizing IS-exchanges that can be influenced by companies are mainly related to a lack of resources in the form of money, time, and knowledge, technical issues and collaborative issues. This leads to the recommendation that the contents of a guideline should address information about the concept and benefits of IS, local facilitation programs, if available, and what to be aware of, if there are no facilitation programs or if the companies decide not to take advantage of them.


Industrial symbiosis Guideline Companies Barriers Enabling factors Facilitation 



The authors thank Henrik Riisgard for competent supervision; and IF Nedbrydning A/S, Siemens Wind Power A/S, Søren Birksø Sørensen, Henrik Møller Thomsen and Xenia Tsitiridou for their contributions to the study.


  1. 1.
    Paquin, R.L., Howard-Greenville, J.: The evolution of facilitated industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 83–93 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paquin, R.L., Tilleman, S.G., Howard-Greenville, J.: Is there cash in that trash. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 268 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chertow, M.R.: “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. J. Ind. Ecol. 11, 11–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fichtner, W., Tietzw-Söckinger, I., Frank, M., Rentz, O.: Barriers of interorganisational environmental management: two case studies on industrial symbiosis. Prog. Ind. Ecol. 2, 73–88 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibbs, D., Deutz, P.: Reflections on implemententing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development. J. Clean. Prod. 15, 1663–1695 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chertow, M.R.: Industrial symbiosis. Encycl. Energy 3, 407–415 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cote, R., Grant, J.: Industrial ecology and the sustainabilty of Canadian cities. In: The Conference Board of Canada, pp. 1–31. Eco Efficient Centre, Halifax (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombardi, D.R., Laybourn, P.: Redefining industrial symbiosis: crossing academic-practitioner boundaries. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, 28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ashton, W.: Understanding the organization of industrial ecosystems: a social network approach. J. Ind. Ecol. 12, 34 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dhanaraj, C., Parkhe, A.: Orchestrating innovation networks. Acad. Mannag. Rev. 31, 659–669 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bason, C., Knudsen, S., Toft, S.: Activate the Citizen—How to Involve Citizens and Companies in Public Innovation. Gyldendal, Copenhagen (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Powell, W.W., Packalen, K., Whittington, K. (eds.): Organizational and Institutional Genesis: The Emergence of High-Tech Clusters in the Life Sciences. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kilduff, M., Tsai, W.: Social Networks and Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L.: Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: netoworks of learning in biotechnology. Adm. Sci. Q. 41, 116–145 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baum, J.A., Shipilov, A.V., Rowley, T.J.: Where do small worlds come from? Ind. Corp. Change 12, 697–725 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Campbell, D.T., Fiske, D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56(2), 81 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education. Taylor & Francis e-Library. (2007)
  18. 18.
    Greene, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., Graham, W.F.: Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educ. Eval. Policy Anal. 11, 256 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Flyvbjerg, B.: Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual. Inq. 12, 219–245 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Novkovic, A., Chobanova, H., Kubilius, T., Mäkitie, T., Serebrjakova, L., Deng, Y., Zhao, W.: Environmental cooperation in erhvervs Netværk 9220, 1–66 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winther, S.: Implementation and Efficiency. Systime Academic, Viborg (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kvale, S., Brinkman, S.: Interview—An Introduction to a Craft. Hans Reitzels Forlag A/S, København (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maes, T., Eetvelde, G.V., Ras, E.D., Block, C., Pisman, A., Verhofstede, B., Vandendriessche, F., Vandevelde, L.: Energy management on industrial parks in Flanders. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15, 1988–2005 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bojsen, I., Ulhøi, J. P: Industrial symbiosis in an extended perspektive. Department of Organisation & Management, The Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Almasi, A., Maria, Soque, C., Strandgaard, C.K., Sacchi, R.: Modelling industrial symbiosis to find the potentials and barriers in Aalborg. Department of Planning, Aalborg University, Denmark (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningAalborg UniversityBrammingDenmark
  2. 2.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningAalborg UniversityÅrhus CDenmark
  3. 3.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningAalborg UniversityNørresundbyDenmark
  4. 4.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningAalborg UniversityMiddelfartDenmark

Personalised recommendations