Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 6, Issue 5, pp 927–945 | Cite as

Valorisation Opportunities Related to Wastewater and Animal By-Products Exploitation by the Greek Slaughtering Industry: Current Status and Future Potentials

  • K. Valta
  • P. Damala
  • E. Orli
  • C. Papadaskalopoulou
  • K. Moustakas
  • D. Malamis
  • M. Loizidou
Original Paper


The present study aims at uncovering valorisation opportunities in the Greek slaughtering industry related to wastewater and animal by-products exploitation. To this end, 12 Greek slaughterhouses were studied, while literature review of published work on wastewater and animal by-products treatment and valorisation was also conducted. Based on the recording of the existing situation in Greece, it was observed that all slaughterhouses operate biological wastewater treatment plants. The activated sludge process was mostly applied. Animal by-products derived from the operation of the slaughterhouses were mainly treated inside the units through incineration or rendering. In many of the slaughterhouses, animal by-products were treated as being category 1 and, thus, potential by-product valorisation remained unexploited. Moreover, ashes from the incineration of animal by-products and of rendering residues were mainly sent to landfills. Considering the above, in order to add value to the Greek slaughtering industry, anaerobic digestion could be applied instead of the activated sludge process or as a first step prior to aerobic treatment of wastewater resulting in both wastewater treatment and biogas generation. Anaerobic digestion is also an attractive valorisation opportunity for treating animal by-products (category 3 and category 2 after pressure sterilisation). Animal by-products category 3 can also be exploited for the extraction of substances and the subsequent manufacture of feedstuffs, cosmetics or medicinal products. Moreover, separately collected blood can be utilised for the recovery of bioactive peptides to be used in the pharmaceutical industry or as a protein source for pet food. Finally, future valorisation potentials for the Greek slaughtering sector can be found in the ash exploitation as a phosphorous source.


Slaughterhouse Abattoir Meat sector ABPs Valorisation Wastewater Review Greece 



The authors would like to thank the European Social Fund and the Hellenic Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs, Cultures and Sports (Managing Authority) for funding the project: FOODINBIO/2915 entitled “Development of an innovative, compact system that combines biological treatment technologies for the sustainable and environmental management of organic waste streams that are produced from different types of food processing industries”, in the framework of the Operational Programme Educational and Lifelong Learning (NSRF 2007– 2013).


  1. 1.
    FoodDrinkEurope: Data & Trends of the European Food and Drink Industry, (2014). Accessed Dec 2014
  2. 2.
    Regulation (EC) No 853/2004 of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004, laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin, OJ L 139, 30.4.2004, p. 55205, Accessed Dec 2014
  3. 3.
    Valta, K., Kosanovic, T., Malamis, D., Moustakas, K., Loizidou, M.: Overview of water usage and wastewater management in the food and beverage industry. Desalin. Water Treat. (2014). doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.934100 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rajakumara, R., Meenambala, T., Saravananb, P.M., Ananthanarayanan, P.: Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater in hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor packed with pleated poly vinyl chloride rings. Bioresour. Technol. 103(1), 116–122 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    de Nardi, I.R., Del Nery, V., Amorim, A.K.B., dos Santosa, N.G., Chimenes, F.: Performances of SBR, chemical-DAF and UV disinfection for poultry slaughterhouse wastewater reclamation. Desalination 269(1–3), 184–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keskes, S., Hmaied, F., Gannoun, H., Bouallagui, H., Godon, J.J., Hamdi, M.: Performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the aerobic treatment of abattoir wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 103(1), 28–34 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cao, W., Mehrvar, M.: Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined anaerobic baffled reactor and UV/H2O2 processes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89(7), 1136–1143 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Debik, E., Coskun, T.: Use of the static granular bed reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 100(11), 2777–2782 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gannoun, H., Bouallagui, H., Okbi, A., Sayadi, S., Hamdi, M.: Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biologically pretreated abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter. J. Hazard. Mater. 170(1), 263–271 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kobyaa, M., Senturka, E., Bayramoglub, M.: Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewaters by electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 133(1–3), 172–176 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caixetaa, C.E.T., Cammarotab, M.C., Xavie, A.M.F.: Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment: evaluation of a new three-phase separation system in a UASB reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 81(1), 61–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing, OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 1–33Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Escudero, A., Lacalle, A., Blanco, F., Pinto, M., Dıaz, I., Dominguez, A.: Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2, 819–825 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marcos, A., Al-Kassir, A., López, F., Cuadros, F., Brito, P.: Environmental treatment of slaughterhouse wastes in a continuously stirred anaerobic reactor: effect of flow rate variation on biogas production. Fuel Process. Technol. 103, 178–182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Palatsi, J., Viñas, M., Guivernau, M., Fernandez, B., Flotats, X.: Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse waste: main process limitations and microbial community interactions. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 2219–2227 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hejnfelt, A., Angelidaki, I.: Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse by-products. Biomass Bioenergy 33, 1046–1054 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    European Commission: Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Slaughterhouses and Animal By-products Industries, (2005). Accessed Dec 2014
  18. 18.
    Walsh, C.: The improving opportunities to add value to the beef and sheep slaughtering sectors. EBLEX.
  19. 19.
    Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption, OJ L L 273, 10/10/2002, pp. 195 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive, OJ L 54, 26.2.2011,pp. 1254 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pagés-Díaza, J., Pereda-Reyes, I., Taherzadeh, M.J., Sárvári-Horváth, I., Lundin, M.: Anaerobic co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse wastes with agro-residues: synergistic and antagonistic interactions determined in batch digestion assays. Chem. Eng. J. 245(1), 89–98 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, Z., Banks, C.J.: Evaluation of a two stage anaerobic digester for the treatment of mixed abattoir wastes. Process Biochem. 38, 1267–1273 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Escudero, A., Lacalle, A., Blanco, F., Pinto, M., Dıaz, I., Dominguez, A.: Semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2, 819–825 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ortner, M., Leitzinger, K., Skupien, S., Bochmann, G., Fuchs, W.: Efficient anaerobic mono-digestion of N-rich slaughterhouse waste: influence of ammonia, temperature and trace elements. Bioresour. Technol. 174, 222–232 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoon, Y.-M., Kim, S.-H., Oh, S.-Y., Kim, C.-H.: Potential of anaerobic digestion for material recovery and energy production in waste biomass from a poultry slaughterhouse. Waste Manage. 34(1), 204–209 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pozdniakova, T.A., Costa, J.C., Santos, R.J., Alves, M.M., Boaventura, R.A.R.: Anaerobic biodegradability of Category 2 animal by-products: methane potential and inoculum source. Bioresour. Technol. 124, 276–282 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Resch, C., Wörl, A., Waltenberger, R., Braun, R., Kirchmayr, R.: Enhancement options for the utilisation of nitrogen rich animal by-products in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 2503–2510 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bah, C.S.F., Bekhit, A.E.-D.A., Carne, A., McConnell, M.A.: Slaughterhouse blood: an emerging source of bioactive compounds. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf 12(3), 314–331 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bhaskar, N., Modi, V.K., Govindaraju, K., Radha, C., Lalitha, R.G.: Utilization of meat industry by products: protein hydrolysate from sheep visceral mass. Bioresour. Technol. 98, 388–394 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Krasnoshtanova, A.A.: Obtaining enzymatic protein and lipid hydrolysates from byproducts of the meat processing industry. Catal. Ind. 2(2), 173–179 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Selmane, D., Christophe, V., Gholamreza, D.: Extraction of proteins from slaughterhouse by-products: influence of operating conditions on functional properties. Meat Sci. 79, 640–647 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tahergorabi, R., Sivanandan, L., Jaczynski, J.: Dynamic rheology and endothermic transitions of proteins recovered from chicken–meat processing by-products using isoelectric solubilization/precipitation and addition of TiO2. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 46, 148–155 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saeid, A., Labuda, M., Chojnacka, K., Gorecki, H.: Valorization of bones to liquid phosphorus fertilizer by microbial solubilization. Waste Biomass Valor. 5, 265–272 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sueyoshi, Y., Hashimoto, T., Yoshikawa, M., Watanabe, K.: Transformation of Intact chicken feathers into chiral separation membranes. Waste Biomass Valor. 2, 303–307 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Verbeek, C.J.R., Lay, M.C., Higham, C.: protein intercalated bentonite recovered using adsorption from stickwater. Waste Biomass Valor. 3, 109–115 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paul, T., Das, A., Mandal, A., Halder, S.K., DasMohapatra, P.K., Pati, B.R., Mondal, K.C.: Valorization of chicken feather waste for concomitant production of keratinase, oligopeptides and essential amino acids under submerged fermentation by paenibacillus woosongensis TKB2. Waste Biomass Valor. 5, 575–584 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Murali, R., Anumary, A., Ashokkumar, M., Thanikaivelan, P., Chandrasekaran, B.: Hybrid biodegradable films from collagenous wastes and natural polymers for biomedical applications. Waste Biomass Valor. 2, 323–335 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cicek, B., Tucci, A., Bernardo, E., Will, J., Boccaccini, A.R.: Development of glass-ceramics from boron containing waste and meat bone ash combinations with addition of waste glass. Ceram. Int. 40(4), 6045–6051 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Urbaniak, M., Sakson, G.: Preserving sludge from meat industry waste waters through lactic fermentation. Process Biochem. 34(2), 127–132 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ur Rahman, U., Sahar, A., Khan, M.A.: Recovery and utilization of effluents from meat processing industries. Food Res. Int. 65C, 322–328 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Luste, S., Vilhunen, S., Luostarinen, S.: Effect of ultrasound and addition of bacterial product on hydrolysis of by-products from the meat-processing industry. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 65(2), 318–325 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Coutand, M., Cyr, M., Deydier, E., Guilet, R., Clastres, P.: Characteristics of industrial and laboratory meat and bone meal ashes and their potential applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 150(3), 522–532 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Ladas, D.: Meat waste treatment methods and potential uses. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 43, 543–559 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mittal, G.S.: Treatment of wastewater from abattoirs before land application—a review. Bioresour. Technol. 97, 1119–1135 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Johns, M.R.: Developments in wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 54, 203–216 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chakraborty, R., Gupta, A.K., Chowdhury, R.: Conversion of slaughterhouse and poultry farm animal fats and wastes to biodiesel: parametric sensitivity and fuel quality assessment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 29, 120–134 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Banković-Ilić, I.B., Stojković, I.J., Stamenković, O.S., Veljkovic, V.B., Hung, Y.-T.: Waste animal fats as feedstocks for biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 32, 238–254 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hamawand, I.: Anaerobic digestion process and bio-energy in meat industry: a review and a potential. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 44, 37–51 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Salminen, E., Rintala, J.: Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste—a review. Bioresour. Technol. 83, 13–26 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jayathilakan, K., Khudsia, S., Radhakrishna, K., Bawa, A.S.: Utilization of byproducts and waste materials from meat, poultry and fish processing industries: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 49(3), 278–293 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gómez-Guillén, M.C., Giménez, B., López-Caballero, M.E., Montero, M.P.: Functional and bioactive properties of collagen and gelatin from alternative sources: a review. Food Hydrocolloid 25, 1813–1827 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Di Bernardini, R., Harnedy, P., Bolton, D., Kerry, J., O’Neill, E., Mullen, A.M., Hayes, M.: Antioxidant and antimicrobial peptidic hydrolysates from muscle protein sources and by-products. Food Chem. 124, 1296–1307 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lafarga, T., Hayes, M.: Bioactive peptides from meat muscle and by-products: generation, functionality and application as functional ingredients. Meat Sci. 98, 227–239 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mora, L., Reig, M., Toldrá, F.: Bioactive peptides generated from meat industry by-products. Food Res. Int. 65C, 344–349 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chojnacka, K., Gorecka, H., Michalak, I., Gorecki, H.: A review: valorization of keratinous materials. Waste Biomass Valor. 2, 317–321 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Young, J.F., Therkildsen, M., Ekstrand, B., Che, B.N., Larsen, M.K., Oksbjerg, N., Stagsted, J.: Novel aspects of health promoting compounds in meat. Meat Sci. 95(4), 904–911 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mapiye, C., Aldai, N., Turner, T.D., Aalhus, J.L., Rolland, D.C., Kramer, J.K.G., Dugan, M.E.R.: The labile lipid fraction of meat: from perceived disease and waste to health and opportunity. Meat Sci. 92(3), 210–220 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lammens, T.M., Franssen, M.C.R., Scott, E.L., Sanders, J.P.M.: Availability of protein-derived amino acids as feedstock for the production of bio-based chemicals. Biomass Bioenergy 44, 168–181 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lasekan, A., Abu Bakar, F., Hashim, D.: Potential of chicken by-products as sources of useful biological resources. Waste Manag. 33(3), 552–565 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nzihou, A., Sharrock, P.: Role of phosphate in the remediation and reuse of heavy metal polluted wastes and sites. Waste Biomass Valor. 1, 163–174 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Usón, A.A., López-Sabirón, A.M., Ferreira, G., Sastresa, E.L.: Uses of alternative fuels and raw materials in the cement industry as sustainable waste management options. Renew. Sustain Energy Rev. 23, 242–260 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of Dublin: Animal By-products Trader Notice No. 02/2011, Animal By-products and waste water treatment. (2011) Accessed Dec 2014
  63. 63.
    DEFRA: Controls on Animal By-Products - Guidance on Regulation (EC) 1069/2009 and accompanying implementing Regulation (EC) 142/2011, enforced in England by the Animal By-Products (Enforcement) (England) Regulations 2011. (2011) Accessed Dec 2014
  64. 64.
    Bustillo-Lecompte, C.F., Mehrvar, M., Quiñones-Bolaños, E.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of TOC removal from slaughterhouse wastewater using combined anaerobic-aerobic and UV/H2O2 processes. J. Environ. Manag. 134, 145–152 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Bohdziewicz, J., Sroka, E.: Application of hybrid systems to the treatment of meat industry wastewater. Desalination 198, 33–40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sroka, E., Kamfliski, W., Bohdziewicz, J.: Biological treatment of meat industry wastewater. Desalination 162, 85–91 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bohdziewicz, J., Sroka, E.: Integrated system of activated sludge–reverse osmosis in the treatment of the wastewater from the meat industry. Process Biochem. 40, 1517–1523 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Amudaa, O.S., Alade, A.: Coagulation/flocculation process in the treatment of abattoir wastewater. Desalination 196, 22–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bohdziewicz, J., Sroka, E.: Treatment of wastewater from the meat industry applying integrated membrane systems. Process Biochem. 40, 1339–1346 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bohdziewicz, J., Sroka, E., Lobos, E.: Application of the system which combines coagulation, activated sludge and reverse osmosis to the treatment of the wastewater produced by the meat industry. Desalination 144, 393–398 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Bickers, P.O., Van Oostrom, A.J.: Availability for denitrification of organic carbon in meat-processing wastestreams. Bioresour. Technol. 73, 53–58 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sindhu, R., Meera, V.: Treatment Of Slaughterhouse Effluent using upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor. Int. Proc. Comput. Sci. Inf. Tech. 38, 147 (2012)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Borja, R., Bank, C.J., Wang, Z., Mancha, A.: Anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse wastewater and filter arrangement in a single reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 65, 125–133 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    McCabe, B.K., Hamawand, I., Harris, P., Baillie, C., Yusaf, T.: A case study for biogas generation from covered anaerobic ponds treating abattoir wastewater: investigation of pond performance and potential biogas production. Appl. Energy 114, 798–808 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ge, H., Batstone, D.J., Keller, J.: Operating aerobic wastewater treatment at very short sludge ages enables treatment and energy recovery through anaerobic sludge digestion. Water Res. 47, 6546–6557 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., Sala, S.: Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 28–41 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Deydier, E., Guilet, R., Sarda, S., Sharrock, P.: Physical and chemical characterisation of crude meat and bone meal combustion residue: waste or raw material? J. Hazard. Mater. B121, 141–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Deydier, E., Guilet, R., Cren, S., Pereas, V., Mouchet, F., Gauthier, L.: Evaluation of meat and bone meal combustion residue as lead immobilizing material for in situ remediation of polluted aqueous solutions and soils: “Chemical and ecotoxicological studies”. J. Hazard. Mater. 146, 227–236 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    González-González, A., Cuadros, F., Ruiz-Celma, A., López-Rodríguez, F.: Influence of heavy metals in the biomethanation of slaughterhouse waste. J. Clean. Prod. 65, 473–478 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cavaleiro, A.J., Ferreira, T., Pereira, F., Tommaso, G., Alves, M.M.: Biochemical methane potential of raw and pre-treated meat-processing wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 129, 519–525 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Luostarinen, S., Luste, S., Sillanpää, M.: Increased biogas production at wastewater treatment plants through co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge from a meat processing plant. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 79–85 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Buendía, I.M., Fernández, F.J., Villaseñor, J., Rodríguez, L.: Feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion as a treatment option of meat industry wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 100(6), 1903–1909 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cuetos, M.J., Gómez, X., Otero, M., Morán, A.: Anaerobic digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste (SHW) at laboratory scale: influence of co-digestion with the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW). Biochem. Eng. J. 40(1), 99–106 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Kondamudi, N., Strull, J., Misra, M., Mohapatra, S.K.: A Green Process for Producing Biodiesel from Feather Meal. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57, 6163–6166 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Cascarosa, E., Gea, G., Arauzo, J.: Thermochemical processing of meat and bone meal: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 16(1), 942–957 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Virmond, E., Schacker, R.L., Albrecht, W., Althoff, C.A., de Souza, M., Moreira, R.F.P.M., José, H.J.: Organic solid waste originating from the meat processing industry as an alternative energy source. Energy 36, 3897–3906 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    de Sena, R.F., Claudino, A., Moretti, K., Bonfanti, I.C.P., Moreira, R.F.P.M., Jose, H.J.: Biofuel application of biomass obtained from a meat industry wastewater plant through the flotation process—a case study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 52, 557–569 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hiromi Ariyaratne, W.K., Malagalage, A., Melaaen, M.C., Tokheim, L.-A.: CFD modelling of meat and bone meal combustion in a cement rotary kiln—investigation of fuel particle size and fuel feeding position impacts. Chem. Eng. Sci. 123, 596–608 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Vermeulen, I., Van Caneghem, J., Block, C., Dewulf, W., Vandecasteele, C.: Environmental impact of incineration of calorific industrial waste: rotary kiln vs. cement kiln. Waste Manag. 32(10), 1853–1863 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Campoy, M., Gómez-Barea, A., Ollero, P., Nilsson, S.: Gasification of wastes in a pilot fluidized bed gasifier. Fuel Process. Technol. 121, 63–69 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Cascarosa, E., Becker, J., Ferrante, L., Briens, C., Berruti, F., Arauzo, J.: Pyrolysis of meat-meal and bone-meal blends in a mechanically fluidized reactor. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 91(2), 359–367 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Marculescu, C., Alexe, F.: Assessing the power generation solution by thermal–chemical conversion of meat processing industry waste. Energy Procedia 50, 738–743 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Valta
    • 1
  • P. Damala
    • 1
  • E. Orli
    • 1
  • C. Papadaskalopoulou
    • 1
  • K. Moustakas
    • 1
  • D. Malamis
    • 1
  • M. Loizidou
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Environmental Science and Technology, School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations