Waste and Biomass Valorization

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 209–225 | Cite as

Estimation of Construction and Demolition Waste (C&DW) Generation and Multicriteria Analysis of C&DW Management Alternatives: A Case Study in Spain

  • M. Coronado
  • E. Dosal
  • A. Coz
  • J. R. Viguri
  • A. Andrés
Original Paper

Abstract

Construction and demolition waste (C&DW) constitutes a priority waste stream in the European waste strategy due to its large volume and its high recycling and reuse potential. Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, stresses the need of quantify the waste stream and to improve the material recovery efficiency of C&DW in the European Union. Designing a suitable network of facilities involves an adequate knowledge of the inputs to material recovery facilities. In this work, a two-step methodology for the quantification and waste management analysis of C&DW has been developed and applied to the case study in Cantabria, a northern Spanish region. In the first step, the quantification of C&DW was calculated by means of an equation which combines municipal licenses and ratios of waste per unit area of construction, demolition and renovation. The selected ratios for the study case in Cantabria belong to four northern Spanish regions, and they were developed by two associations of architects, one technological institute and by the regional legislation recently developed in the region. In the second step, the waste management assessment for C&DW was carry out throw the development of a multicriteria-based methodology for decision-making in order to select the most suitable management alternative. The application of the methodology to the case study in Cantabria has been performed using four multicriteria analysis methods: Evamix (EV), Weighted Summation (WS), Electre II (E2) and Regime (REG). Analyses of the sensitivity of the results have been also carried out in order to investigate the robustness of the solutions obtained in the decision making process.

Keywords

Construction and demolition waste Generation Multicriteria analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Bossink, B., Brouwers, H.: Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. Appl. 122(1), 55–60 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Ansary M.S., et al.: Sustainable Guidelines for Managing Demolition Waste in Egypt. Proceedings of the International RILEM Conference on the Use of Recycled Materials in Building and Structures, Barcelona,1, 331–340, 2004. e-ISBN: 2-912143-52-7. Abstract number 221. CIMNE congress web http://congress.cimne.upc.es/rilem04/frontal/Papers.htm (2004). Accessed June 2010
  3. 3.
    Esin, T., Cosgun, N.: A study to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Build. Environ. Appl 42, 1667–1674 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Solís-Guzman, J., et al.: A Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. Waste Manag. Appl 29, 2542–2548 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aggregates Advisory Service: Construction and demolition Waste - the European Union Priority waste streams Programme. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions Research. http://www.p2pays.org/ref/17/16592.pdf. Accessed June 2010
  6. 6.
    European Commission: Bio intelligence Service (2010). Service contract on management of construction and demolition waste. Draft Final Report Task 2. European Commission (DG ENV) European commission web http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/prevention/pdf/WPG_final_report.pdf. Accessed Oct 2010
  7. 7.
    European Commission: Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on wasteGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eurostat: Statistics database 2010. Waste statistics. Eurostat web. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_wasgen&lang=en. Accessed Oct 2010
  9. 9.
    Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE)/Official Spanish Gazette. 2009. Decision 20th Jan. 2009. II National Spanish Plan for C&D Waste. BOE Num 49:19893-20016 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boletin Oficial de Cantabria (BOC)/Official Gazette of Cantabria 2007. Decree 22/2007, 1th March. Sectorial Plan of C&D Waste of Cantabria. BOC Num 052: 3412–3445Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cochran, K., et al.: Estimation of regional building-related C&D debris generation and composition: case study for Florida, US. Waste Manag. Appl. 27, 921–931 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fatta, D., et al.: Generation and management of construction and demolition waste in Greece-An existing challenge. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Appl 40, 81–89 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    EPA, European Waste Catalogue and Hazardous Waste List. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government web. http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/Environment/Waste/WEEE/FileDownLoad. Accessed June 2010
  14. 14.
    Hendriks, C., Janssen, G.: A new vision on the building cycle. Aeneas technical publishers (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sousa et al.: Construction and demolition waste in the region of Porto-Portugal: Management and survey. Proceedings of the International RILEM Conference on the Use of Recycled Materials in Building and Structures, Barcelona. Spain. Abstract 267. CIMNE congress web http://congress.cimne.upc.es/rilem04/frontal/Papers.htm (2004). Accessed June 2010
  16. 16.
    Shi, J., Xu, Y.: Estimation and forecasting of concrete debris amount in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Appl 49, 147–158 (2006)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, W.: Evaluation of the economic feasibility for the recycling of construction and demolition waste in China- The case of Chongquig. Appl. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec. 2009.09.003
  18. 18.
    Martínez Lage, I., et al.: Estimation of the annual production and composition of C&D Debris in Galicia (Spain). Appl. Waste Manag. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.016
  19. 19.
    Kofoworola, O.F., Gheewala, S.H.: Estimation of construction waste generation and management in Thailand. Waste Manag. Appl 29, 731–738 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Poon, C.S.: Evaluating waste management alternatives by the multiple criteria approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Appl. 17, 189–210 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simões Gomes, C.F., et al.: Multicriteria decision making applied to waste recycling in Brazil. Omega Appl. 36, 395–404 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Colson, G., et al.: A multiple criteria analysis for household solid waste management in the urban community of Dakar. Waste Manag. Appl. 27, 1690–1705 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Banias, G., et al.: Assessing multiple criteria for the optimal location of a construction and demolition waste management facility. Build. Environ. Appl. 45, 2317–2326 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang, J.Y., et al.: A system analysis tool for construction and demolition wastes management. Waste management Appl 24, 989–997 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roussat, N., et al.: Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis. Waste Management Appl 29, 12–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Spoerri, A., et al.: Expert- based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning- C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Appl. 3, 592–600 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lenihan, H.: A model for assessing the economic viability of construction and demolition waste recycling - The case of Ireland. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 46, 302–320 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stylianou, M.: An integrated approach for the management of demolition waste in Cyprus. Waste Management and Research Appl. 26, 573–581 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Janssen, R.: On the Use of Multi-Criteria Analysis in Environmental Impact Assessment in The Netherlands. Appl. J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. Vol. 10, 101–109 (2001). doi:10.1002/mcda.293 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    European Community: Commision Decision 2000/532/EC of 3 May 2000. European Waste CatalogueGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fülöp, J.: Introduction to decision making methods. Laboratory of operations research and decision systems, computer and automation institute, Hungarian Academy of sciences. Evergreen College web. http://academic.evergreen.edu/projects/bdei/documents/decisionmakingmethods.pdf (2010). Accessed Oct 2010
  32. 32.
    Reed, M.S.: Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biol. Conserv. Appl. 1441, 2417–2431 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mustajoki, J., et al.: Participatory multicriteria decision analysis with Web-HIPRE: A case of lake regulation policy. Appl. Environ. Model. Softw. 19, 537–547 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tanz, J.S., Howard, A.F.: Meaningful public participation in the planning and management of publicly owned forest’. For. Chron. Appl. 67, 125–130 (1991)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alvarez-Guerra, M., et al.: A multicriteria- based methodology for site priorisation in sediment management. Environ. Int. Appl. 35, 920–930 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Higgins, A., Hajkowicz, S.: A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur. J. Opera. Res. Appl. 184, 255–265 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saaty, T.L.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw- Hill, New York (1980)MATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roy, B.: Multicriteria 1996 methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1996)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bonbacu, S.: using the multi-criteria analysis (mca) in the drafting of Doctorate papers. Annals of the oradea university. Fascicle of Management and Technological Engineering Appl. VII (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Instituto de Tecnología de la Construcción de Cataluña (iTeC)/Catalan Institute of Construction Technology. http://www.itec.cat/ca/publications/pdf/altres/canon_runes/pla_gestio.pdf. Accessed Apr 2009
  42. 42.
    Colegio de Arquitectos la Rioja (COAR)/Regional Association of Architects of La Rioja (COAR) http://www.coar.es/visado/impresos.fr.htm (2009). Accessed Apr 2009
  43. 43.
    Colegio de Arquitectos de arquitectos técnicos de A Coruña (COAATAC)/Regional Associations of Architects and Technical Architects of Corunna, http://www.coaatac.org/files/adjuntos/articulo/ProduccionResiduos.pdf (2009). Accessed Apr 2009
  44. 44.
    Ministerio de Fomento/National department of Development. http://www.fomento.es/MFOM/LANG_CASTELLANO/INFORMACION_MFOM/INFORMACION_ESTADISTICA/Construccion. Accessed Feb 2009
  45. 45.
    ICANE: Instituto Cantabro de Estadística/Statistic Institute of Cantabria. Municipal Statistics. Building and Construction Information. www.icane.es. Accessed Mar 2009
  46. 46.
    Eurostat: News release euro indicators 2010. Eurostat web http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITYPUBLIC/4-19102010-AP/EN/4-19102010-AP-EN.PDF. Accessed Oct 2010
  47. 47.
    Medioambiente, Agua, Residuos Y Energía de Cantabria S.A (MARE). Company web http://www.mare.es. Accessed June 2010
  48. 48.
    Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE)/Official Spanish Gazette: Decision 12th July 2001. I National Spanish Plan for C&D Waste. BOE Num 166: 25305-25313Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Janssen, R., et al.: DEFINITE 3.0 case studies and user manual. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Institute for Environmental Studies. Vrije Universiteit. (2003)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Olson, D.L.: Decision aids for selection problems. Springer, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Voogd, H.: Multicriterion evaluation with mixed qualitative and quantitative data. Environ. Plan. Bull. Appl. 9, 221–236 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Figuerira, J., et al. Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. International series in operations research & management science, 78 (2005)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Vreeker, R., Nijkamp, P., Welle, C.T.: A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Appl. Ideas (RePEc) 7 27-47. doi: 10.1016/S0969-6997(01)00005-9 (2002)
  54. 54.
    Nunes, K.R.A., et al.: Evaluation of investments in recycling centres for construction and demolition wastes in Brazilian municipalities. Waste Manag. Appl. 27, 1531–1540 (2007)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Diario Oficial de Castilla la Mancha (DOCM)/Official Regional Gazette of Castilla La Mancha: Decision 13th December 2005. Regional Plan for C&DW of Castilla la Mancha (2006-2015). DOCM nº 253: 16th December 2005. Decree 189/2005Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    BTB, 2009. Bizkaiko Txintxor Berziklategia (BTB). C&DW recycling plant Tipping fees and sales price of secondary aggregates. http://www.btbab.com. [Consulted October 2010]
  57. 57.
    Salmedina, S.L. Salmedina C&DW recycling plant. Tipping fees and sales price of secondary aggregates. http://salmedinatri.com (2009) [Consulted October 2010]
  58. 58.
    UTE planta de Navalcarnero. C&DW recycling plant. Tipping fees and sales price of secondary aggregates. http://www.uteplantanavalcarnero.es (2009) [Consulted October 2010]
  59. 59.
    Alcorec. C&DW recycling plant. Tipping fees and sales price of secondary aggregates. http://www.alcoresrecicla.com (2009) [Consulted October 2010]
  60. 60.
    Chamber of Commerce of Sabadell. http://www.cambrasabadell.org (2004). Accessed Oct 2010
  61. 61.
    Scora engineers. Project of construction of a C&DW recycling plant in Sán Lucar de Barrameda (Cádiz). Scora Web http://www.proyectoasistido.com/index2.php?option=com_docman&gid=882&task=doc_view&Itemid=48 (2007) [Consulted October 2010]
  62. 62.
    Onanadía de Dios, C., Ruíz Puente, M.C. C&DW recycling plant. Master thesis. Cantabria University (2005)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    CIUDEN. Feasibility study of a recycling plant of C&DW in Bierzo. Fundación Ciudad de la Energía (CIUDE)/Foundation of the City of Energy. Spanish Government. http://www.Ciuden.es/index.asp?pagina=programas&c=6&subpagina=233 (2008) [Consulted October 2010]
  64. 64.
    Geneva Trade & Development Forum (GTDF). Conference of the Geneva Trade & Development Forum (GTDF): The trade and environment relationships reconsidered. The case of regional trade and regional trade agreements. http://www.gtdforum.org/download/Commerce%20&%20nvir-ang.pdf (2008) [Consulted Oct 2010]

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Coronado
    • 1
  • E. Dosal
    • 1
  • A. Coz
    • 1
  • J. R. Viguri
    • 1
  • A. Andrés
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Inorganic ChemistryUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain

Personalised recommendations