Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis and optimization of lead/lead-free perovskite solar cell

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparative analysis with methyl ammonium lead iodide and methyl ammonium tin iodide as absorber layers in a perovskite solar cell (PSC) is done through modelling and simulation in SCAPS-1D. Four lead-based and lead-free models with similar transporting layers are optimized with respect to the donor and acceptor densities of transporting layers as well as absorber keeping other parameters like total defect density and thickness same. It is observed that lead-free tin-based PSCs shows best performance than the lead-based PSC with similar transporting materials. With Cu2O and TiO2 as hole and electron transport layers respectively, lead and lead-free PSC exhibits 20.18 and 28.76% conversion efficiencies. On the other hand, CuI and PCBM taken as corresponding layers the conversion efficiencies reach 17.86 and 24.16% efficiencies for lead and lead-free PSCs respectively. The study enforces the use of non-toxic lead-free PSC with better performance than lead-based PSCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C Qiu, L Jiang, Y Gao and L Sheng Mater. Des. 230 111952 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Q Wan, C-Y Huang, Z-W Hou, H Jiang and L Wang Org. Chem. Front. 10 3585 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. X Zhang et al Adv. Energy Mater. 6 1502588 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X M Huang et al Sol. RRL 7 2300143 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G Huang, Q Kong, W Yao and Q Wang ChemSusChem 16 202202070 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Z Huang, P Luo, H Zheng, Z Lyu and X Ma J. Phys. Chem. Solids 172 111081 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y Wei et al Adv. Opt. Mater. 10 2201396 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H X Zhang, P F Wang, C G Yao, S P Chen, K Di Cai and F N Shi Rare Met. 42 2516 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. L Sha et al J. Colloid Interface Sci. 647 421 (2023)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. W Hao and J Xie J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage 18 2 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S Mu, Q Liu, P Kidkhunthod, X Zhou, W Wang and Y Tang Natl. Sci. Rev. 8 7 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M Wang, C Jiang, S Zhang, X Song, Y Tang and H M Cheng Nat. Chem. 10 667 (2018)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Q Liu, Q Chen, Y Tang and H M Cheng Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6 1 (2023)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. C Chen, C S Lee and Y Tang Nano Micro Lett. 15 1 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C Lu et al J. Power Sources 574 233134 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. X Zhang, Y Xiong, Y Pan, H Du and B Liu Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 66 1 (2023)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. V B Shinde, P M Mhaldar, T N Chhowala, M Mirzaei, S K Ghotekar, G S Rashinkar and D M Pore J. Mol. Struct. 1249 131528 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M Mirzaei, A H Rasouli and A Saedi Main Group Chem. 20 565 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. T Hu, H Ma, H Sun and K Liu IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 11 67 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J Xie, X Wei, X Bo, P Zhang, P Chen, W Hao and M Yuan Front. Energy Res. 11 1180881 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A Hima, N Lakhdar and A Saadoune J. Nano- Electron. Phys. 11 1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A Hima, N Lakhdar, B Benhaoua, A Saadoune, I Kemerchou and F Rogti Superlattices Microstruct. 129 240 (2019)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. M Kim, G H Kim, T K Lee, I W Choi, H W Choi, Y Jo, Y J Yoon, J W Kim, J Lee, D Huh and H Lee Joule 3 2179 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Research Cell Efficiency Records | Department of Energy. https://www.energy.gov/eere/solar/articles/research-cell-efficiency-records. Accessed 4 Dec 2022

  25. H Min et al Nature 598 444 (2021)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. R Wang, M Mujahid, Y Duan, Z K Wang, J Xue and Y Yang Adv. Funct. Mater. 29 1808843 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Q Wang, N Phung, D Di Girolamo, P Vivo and A Abate Energy Environ. Sci. 12 865 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A Thakur, D Singh and S Kaur Gill Mater. Today Proc. 71 195 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A Husainat, W Ali, P Cofie, J Attia and J Fuller Am. J. Opt. Photonics 7 33 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A K Singh, S Srivastava, A Mahapatra, J K Baral and B Pradhan Opt. Mater. 117 111193 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. P Roy and A Khare Int. J. Energy Res. 46 15881 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. A Thakur, D Singh and S K Gill 2022 Int. Conf. Intell. Controll. Comput. Smart Power p 1 (2022)

  33. S Chatterjee and A J Pal J. Phys. Chem. C 120 1428 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. C Zuo and L Ding Small 11 5528 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. C Malerba, F Biccari, C Leonor Azanza Ricardo, M D’Incau, P Scardi and A Mittiga Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95 2848 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. J A Christians, R C M Fung and P V Kamat J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 758 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. A Liu, H Zhu, M G Kim, J Kim and Y Y Noh Adv. Sci. 8 2100546 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. F Azri, A Meftah, N Sengouga and A Meftah Sol. Energy 181 372 (2019)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Y Zhong, M Hufnagel, M Thelakkat, C Li and S Huettner Adv. Funct. Mater. 30 1908920 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. M Burgelman, K Decock, S Khelifi and A Abass Thin Solid Films 535 296 (2013)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. A B Coulibaly, S G Bi, J B Assamoi and L Luiselli Model. Numer. Simul. Mater. Sci. 9 97 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. S Sharma and R Mehra Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 8 2817 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. P Roy, N K Sinha, S Tiwari and A Khare IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.798 p 012020 (2020)

  44. S Ahmed, F Jannat, M A K Khan and M A Alim Optik 225 165765 (2021)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. K D Jayan and V Sebastian Adv. Theory Simul. 4 2100027 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. S Rai, B K Pandey and D K Dwivedi Opt. Mater. 100 109631 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhawan Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakur, A., Gill, S.K. & Singh, D. Comparative analysis and optimization of lead/lead-free perovskite solar cell. Indian J Phys 98, 1677–1685 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02939-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-02939-x

Keywords

Navigation