Advertisement

Indian Journal of Physics

, Volume 91, Issue 4, pp 359–369 | Cite as

Imprint of the atmospheric attenuation process on electron distribution in EAS

  • R. K. Dey
  • S. Dam
  • S. Ray
Original Paper

Abstract

The lateral density distribution (LDD) of shower particles in an extensive air shower (EAS) experiment is commonly approximated by a particular type of lateral density function (LDF). A standard perception is being used in air shower physics since long, according to which the LDD is assumed to be symmetric about the EAS axis, and the adopted LDF is adequate for the description of the LDD. However, the simulated electron density of a non-vertical EAS is asymmetric. In this work, such asymmetry in the LDD can be qualitatively explained as the atmospheric attenuation suffered by each shower particle. Quantitatively, the asymmetry can be roughly described in terms of a gap length (GL) between the EAS core and the center of the modified density pattern consisting of several equi-density ellipses. This study also validates the use of such a modeling of the atmospheric attenuation on the electromagnetic component in an EAS by investigating the so called GL in simulated density data. A modified LDF is proposed, based on these features of the simulated densities for the purpose of shower reconstruction in EAS experiments. The GL arises from attenuation effect is found to increase with the mass of the shower initiating particle. A different radial dependence of the local age parameter (LAP) is seen, if the modified LDF is applied to simulated electron densities. Primary cosmic-ray mass sensitivity of the LAP is also re-examined.

Keywords

Simulations Cosmic-rays Extensive air showers Lateral density distribution Atmospheric attenuation 

PACS Nos.

98.70.Sa 96.50.sd 

Notes

Acknowledgments

RKD thanks the SERB, Department of Science and Technology (Govt. of India) for financial support under the Grant No. EMR/2015/001390.

References

  1. [1]
    O Sima et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods in Phys. Res. A 638 147 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A M Hillas Acta Phys. Acad. Sci. 29(S3) p. 355 & p. 533 (1970).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    H Rebel and O Sima Romanian Rep. Phys. 59 609 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    H Rebel et al. 2008 J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 35 085203 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J N Capdevielle and J Gawin J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 8 1317 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    R K Dey, A Bhadra and J N Capdevielle J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part Phys. 39 085201 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R K Dey and A Bhadra Astropart. Phys. 44 68 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A Cillis and S J Scieutto J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 26 309 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M T Dova, M E Mancenido, A G Mariazzi, H Wahlberg, F Arqueros and D Garcia-Pinto Astropart. Phys. 31 312 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    W D Apel et al. Astropart. Phys. 24 467 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S K Gupta et al. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 540 311 (2005)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    W D Apel et al. Astropart. Phys. 29 317 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    S Dam, R K Dey and A Bhadra Information Systems Design and Intelligent Applications (India:Springer) 339 J K Mandal et al. 1 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    K Greisen Prog. Cosmic Ray Phys. NH Publishing Co. Amsterdom (V.III) (1956)Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    H S Snyder Phy. Rev. 76 1563 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S Sanyal, B Ghosh, A Bhadra, A Mukherjee and N Chaudhuri Aust. J. Phys. 46 589 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    D Heck, J Knapp, J N Capdevielle, G Schatz and T Thouw The CORSIKA Air Shower Simulation Program Forchungszantrum Karlsruhe Report FZK6019 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    K Werner, F-Ming Liu and T Pierog Phys. Rev. C 74 044902 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M Bleicher et al. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 25 1859 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    W R Nelson, H Hiramaya and D W O Rogers The EGS4 Code System Report SLAC 265 (1985)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) US Standard Atmosphere Technical Report NASA-TM-X-74335 (1976)Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M Kobal Astropart. Phys. 15 259 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    T Antoni et al. Astropart. Phys. 19 703 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    N Nikolaev Phys. Rev. D 48 1904 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    R M Baltrusaitis et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 1380 (1984)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    R Ulrich, J Blumer, R Engel, F Schussler and M Unger New J. Physics 11 065018 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of North BengalSiliguriIndia

Personalised recommendations