Skip to main content
Log in

Calibration of Resistance-Ratio Thermometry Bridges Using an Automated Resistance Bridge Calibrator

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten resistance-ratio bridges used in thermometry were calibrated using an automated resistance bridge calibrator (RBC). For the best performing bridge, standard deviation s of the error of the resistance-ratio reading was 1.3 × 10−8 without correction, while s of the residuals from the correction was 9 × 10−9 when a correction function was applied. The assessed bridges were confirmed to perform within the accuracy that the manufacturers had specified. We also traced resistance stability in the RBC. By exploiting this stability, the RBC can be used as a set of transfer resistance standards for calibrating bridges with moderate accuracy. A direct comparison between a bridge with an expected accuracy of ~ 10−6 and a bridge with higher accuracy using the RBC was demonstrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.V. Pearce, J. Gray and R.I. Veltcheva, Characterisation of a selection of AC and DC resistance bridges for standard platinum resistance thermometry. Int. J. Thermophys., 37 (2016) 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-016-2113-6.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. D. R. White, A method for calibrating resistance thermometry bridges, TEMPMEKO 1996, Torino, Italy (1996) 129–134

  3. G. Strouse and K. Hill, Performance assessment of resistance ratio bridges used for the calibration of SPRTs. AIP Conf. Proc., 684 (2003) 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1627146.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Rudtsch, G. Ramm, D. Heyer, and R. Vollmert, Comparison of test and calibration methods for resistance ratio bridges, TEMPMEKO 2004, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia (2004) 773–780.

  5. Resistance Bridge Calibrators Models RBC100A and RBC400A User Maintenance Manual/Handbook, ISOTECH.

  6. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, Cambridge University Press, 1986.

  7. J.A. Nelder and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J., 7 (1965) 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/8.1.27.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Joung, K.S. Gam, I. Yang and Y.-G. Kim, Nonlinearity assessment of ASL F900 resistance thermometry bridges. AIP Conf. Proc., 1552 (2013) 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819574.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ‘Research on Measurement Standards for Redefinition of SI Units’ funded by the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS-2021-GP2021-0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inseok Yang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, D., Yang, I. Calibration of Resistance-Ratio Thermometry Bridges Using an Automated Resistance Bridge Calibrator. MAPAN 37, 33–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00516-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-021-00516-3

Keywords

Navigation