Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Evaluation of Air Quality Dispersion Models for PM2.5 at Air Quality Control Regions in Indian and UK Cities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Swelling urban populations and increased concentration of automobile traffic in and around cities have resulted in severe air pollution, threatening human health and undermining the productivity of the urban population. Air quality modelling is one of the important components of urban air quality management (UAQM). This paper contains comparative performance results of three most used commercial air quality models (AQMs) e.g. AERMOD, ADMS-urban and ISCST3. The models are evaluated based on their predictive accuracy of 1-h average PM2.5 concentrations at selected air quality control regions (AQCRs) in the Delhi and Chennai cities in India and Newcastle city in the United Kingdom for critical winter period of year 2009. At Delhi AQCR, ISCST3 predictions of PM2.5 concentrations are more accurate (d = 0.66) than AERMOD (d = 0.51) and ADMS-Urban (d = 0.52). Similar performance of the models have been observed at Chennai city AQCR, i.e., index of agreement ‘d’ = 0.52 for ISCST3 and d = 0.40 and 0.47 for AERMOD and ADMS-Urban, respectively. However, at Newcastle city AQCR, the ISCST3 has predicted PM2.5 concentrations with an accuracy having d = 0.56 while AERMOD and ADMS, having d = 0.53 and 0.54, respectively. Differences in ‘d’ values clearly indicate causal nature of these Gaussian based models and their sensitivity to input data as well as their parsimonies (less input data requirement by models and more accuracy in output results) to geographical and meteorological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.M. Baldasano, E. Valera and P. Jimenez, Air quality data from large cities, Sci. Total Environ., 307 (2003) 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B.R. Gurjar, T.M. Butler, M.G. Lawrence and J. Lelieveld, Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities, Atmos. Environ., 42 (2008) 1593–1606.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.G. Badami, Transport and urban air pollution in India, Environ. Manag., 36 (2005) 195–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Singh, H.K. Gupta, K. Gupta, P. Singh, V.B. Gupta and R.C. Sharma, A comparative study of air pollution in Indian cities’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 78 (2007) 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T.V. Ramachandra and K. Shwetmala, Emissions from India’s transport sector: state wise synthesis, Atmos. Environ., 43 (2009) 5510–5517.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. CPCB, Air quality monitoring, emission inventory and source apportionment study for Indian cities, National Summary Report, Central Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, India (2010).

  7. A.C. Lloyd and G. Bansal, Emissions from transportation and fuels: the importance of initial and real world measurements for policy making in India. MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 28 (2009) 227–234.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.K. Sharma, T.K. Mandal, M. Kumar, N.C. Gupta, H. Pathak, R.C. Harit and M. Saxena, Measurement of ambient ammonia over the National Capital Region of Delhi, India, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 29 (2014) 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.A. Pope, R.T. Burnett, M.J. Thun, E.E. Calle, D. Krewski, K. Ito, G.D. Thurston, Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 287 (2002) 1132–1141.

  10. P. Pant and M.R. Harrison, Critical review of receptor modelling for particulate matter: a case study of India, Atmos. Environ., 49 (2012) 1–12.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.W.S. Longhurst, S.J. Lindley, A.F.R. Watson and D.E. Conlan, The introduction of local air quality management in the United Kingdom: a review and theoretical framework, Atmos. Environ., 30 (1996) 3975–3985.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Gokhale and M. Khare, A theoretical framework for the episodic-urban air quality management plan (e-UAQMP), Atmos. Environ., 41 (2007) 7887–7894.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. S.M.S. Nagendra and M. Khare, Line source emission modelling—review, Atmos. Environ., 36 (2002) 2083–2098.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Gulia, S.S. Nagendra, M. Khare and I. Khanna, Urban air quality management—a review, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 6 (2015) 286–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. G. Sriram, M.N. Krishna and V. Gopalaswamy, Sensitivity study of Gaussian dispersion models, J. Sci. Ind. Res., 65 (2006) 321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Seethala, G. Pandithurai, J.D. Fast, S.D. Polade, M.S. Reddy and S.E. Peckham, Evaluating WRF-Chem multi-scale model in simulating aerosol radiative properties over the tropics—a case study over India, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 26 (2011) 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. USEPA, Federal Register, Part-III, 40 CFR Part 51, Revisions to the guideline on air quality models: adoption of a preferred general purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) dispersion model and Other Revisions; Final Rule, US Environment Protection Agency, USA (2005).

  18. CERC, ADMS-Urban user guide. Cambridge Environmental Research Consultant, Cambridge, UK (2006).

  19. A.D. Bhanarkar, S.K. Goyal, R. Sivacoumar and C.V.C. Rao, Assessment of contribution of SO2 and NO2 from different sources in Jamshedpur region, India, Atmos. Environ., 39 (2005) 7745–7760.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Sharma and A. Chandra, Simulation of air quality using an ISCST3 dispersion model, J. Clean Soil Air Water, 36 (2008) 118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Kansal, M. Khare and C.S. Sharma, Air quality modelling study to analyse the impact of the World Bank emission guidelines for thermal power plants in Delhi, J. Atmos. Pollut. Res., 2 (2011) 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A.P. Kesarkar, M. Dalvi, A. Kaginalkar and A. Ojha, Coupling of the weather research and forecasting model with AERMOD for pollutant dispersion modelling, a case study for PM10 dispersion over Pune, India, Atmos. Environ., 41 (2007) 1976–1988.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J.C. Chang and S.R. Hanna, Air quality model performance evaluation, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 87 (2004) 167–196.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Langner and O. Klemm, A comparison of model performance between AERMOD and AUSTAL2000, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 61 (2011) 640–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Mohan, S. Bhati and P. Marrapu, Performance evaluation of AERMOD and ADMS-Urban models in a tropical urban environment, Indian J. Air Pollut. Control, 9 (2009) 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Kumar, S. Dixit, C. Varadarajan, A. Vijayan and A. Masuraha, Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area, J. Environ. Prog., 25 (2006) 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Mohan and A. Kandya, An analysis of annual and seasonal trends of air quality index of Delhi, J. Environ. Monit. Assess., 131 (2007) 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Goyal, N. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, J.K. Dadoo and M. Dwarakanath, Air quality impact assessment of NO x and PM due to diesel vehicles in Delhi, Trans. Res. Part D, 15 (2010) 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. B. Srimuruganandam and S.M.S. Nagendra, Characteristics of particulate matter and heterogeneous traffic in the urban area of India, Atmos. Environ., 45 (2011) 3091–3102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. N.S. Leksmono, J.W.S. Longhurst, K.A. Linga, T.J. Chatterton, B.E.A. Fisher and J.G. Irvin, Assessment of the relationship between industrial and traffic sources contributing to air quality objective exceedances: a theoretical modelling exercise, J. Environ. Model. Softw., 21 (2006) 494–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Gulia, S. Nagendra and M. Khare, Performance evaluation of ISCST3, ADMS-Urban and AERMOD for urban air quality management in a mega city of India, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan., 9 (2014) 778–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S.D. Attri, S. Singh, B. Mukhopadhyay and A.K. Bhatnagar, Atlas of hourly mixing height and assimilative capacity of atmosphere in India. Met. Monograph No. Environment Meteorology-01/2008, Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi, Govt. of India (2008).

  33. ARAI, Emission factor development for Indian vehicles. Project Report: AEF/2006-07/IOCL/Emission Factor Project, Automotive Research Association of India, Pune, India (2007).

  34. DEFRA, Emission factor tool kit for road transport version 4.2 (EFTv 4.2), The Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK. http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/review-and-assessment/tools/emissions.html. Accessed 21 June 2010.

  35. MoEF, National ambient air quality standards, The Gazette of India, notification number 860, date 16th November 2009, Ministry of Environment and Forest, New Delhi, India (2009).

  36. DEFRA, ‘National air quality objectives and European directive limit and target values for the protection of human health, Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK, http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/documents/National_air_quality_objectives. Accessed 06 December 2012.

  37. S.R. Hanna, B.A. Egan and J. Purdum, Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC3 dispersion models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett Field datasets, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 16 (2001) 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. W.B. Faulkner, B.W. Shaw and T. Grosch, Sensitivity of two dispersion models (AERMOD and ISCST3) to input parameters for a rural ground-level area source, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 58 (2008) 1288–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S. Righi, P. Lucialli and E. Pollini, Statistical and diagnostic evaluation of the ADMS-Urban model compared with an urban air quality monitoring network, Atmos. Environ., 43 (2009) 3850–3857.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D.J. Hall, A.M. Spanton, F. Dunkerley, M. Bennett and R.F. Griffiths, An inter-comparison of the AERMOD, ADMS and ISC dispersion models for regulatory applications, Technical report, P362, ISBN 1 85705-3400, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK (2000).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank to HSBC (INDIA) for sponsoring the HSBC-UKIERI Senior Research Fellow who has worked on this project. We also acknowledge with thanks, the CERC, UK who has provided us the ADMS-Urban for academic and research purposes at subsidized cost. We also express our thanks to the UKIERI, Delhi, India, for the research Grant provided to carry out this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, HauzKhas, New Delhi, India

    Sunil Gulia & Mukesh Khare

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

    Shiva Nagendra

Authors
  1. Sunil Gulia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shiva Nagendra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mukesh Khare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh Khare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gulia, S., Nagendra, S. & Khare, M. Comparative Evaluation of Air Quality Dispersion Models for PM2.5 at Air Quality Control Regions in Indian and UK Cities. MAPAN 30, 249–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-015-0149-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-015-0149-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation