Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative Analysis of X-ray Lithographic Pores by SEM Image Processing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Arrays of regular macropores in electronic, magnetic, photonic and sensing devices can be patterned by X-ray lithography. Such structures inevitably contain some irregularity and require time-consuming pattern inspections. In this work, a pattern inspection by intensity-based digital image processing procedure is proposed and tested on scanning electron microscopy images of porous SU-8 polymer resist. The Otsu’s thresholding converted grayscale to binary images and the closing morphology algorithm was applied to reduce noise in the images. The Canny edge detector was used to identify the contour of each pore by detecting abrupt intensity changes in the binary image. Pores were detected and their sizes were subsequently evaluated. The morphological distributions analyzed by this procedure are comparable to those carried out by the one-by-one human inspection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. S. Singh, M. Arora and R. Kishore, Estimation of measurement uncertainty in characterization of materials using transmission electron microscope (TEM) at NPL, India, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 22 (2007) 263–268.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Bonnet, Some trends in microscope image processing, Micron, 35 (2004) 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K.P. Chaudhary, C. Shakher and S.K. Singh, Measurement of the size and spacing of standard wire sieves using an image processing system and wavelet transform, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 26 (2011) 15-27.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K.S. Choudhari, P. Jidesh, P. Sudheendra and S.D. Kulkarni, Quantification and morphology studies of nanoporous alumina membranes: a new algorithm for digital image processing, Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013) 1061–1072.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E.A. Wargo, T. Kotaka, Y. Tabuchi and E.C. Kumbur, Comparison of focused ion beam versus nano-scale X-ray computed tomography for resolving 3-D microstructures of porous fuel cell materials, J. Power Sources, 241 (2013) 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Zhu, T. Zuo, L.J. Jiang, Z.T. Cai, C. Yan, X. Liu, X. Malcolm and Q.L. Wu, Pore structure analysis on activated carbon fibers-By cluster and watershed transform method, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256 (2009) 587–592.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Guarino, A. Guaccio, P.A. Netti and L. Ambrosio, Image processing and fractal box counting: user-assisted method for multi-scale porous scaffold characterization, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 21 (2010) 3109–3118.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.R. Wojcik and D. Krapf, Solid-state nanopore recognition and measurement using Shannon entropy, IEEE Phot. J., 3 (2011) 337–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Chen, Z.B. Xia and K. Lu, Understanding sintering characteristics of ZnO nanoparticles by FIB-SEM three-dimensional analysis, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 33 (2013) 2499–2507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N.M. Ahmed, A. Ramizy, Z. Hassan, A. Amer, K. Omar, Y. Al-Douri and O.S. Alattas, Nano and microporous GaN characterization using image processing method, Optik, 123 (2012) 1074–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Klaver, G. Desbois, J.L. Urai and R. Littke, BIB-SEM study of the pore space morphology in early mature Posidonia Shale from the Hils area, Germany, Int. J. Coal Geol., 103 (2012) 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M.S. Jouini, S. Vega and E.A. Mokhtar, Multiscale characterization of pore spaces using multifractals analysis of scanning electronic microscopy images of carbonates, Nonlinear Proc. Geoph., 18 (2011) 941–953.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.S. Wong, M.K. Head and N.R. Buenfeld, Pore segmentation of cement-based materials from backscattered electron images, Cem. Concr. Res., 36 (2006) 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. G.H. Woehrle, J.E. Hutchison, S. Ozkar and R.G. Finke, Analysis of nanoparticle transmission electron microscopy data using a public-domain image processing program, Image, Turk. J. Chem., 30 (2006) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Tirta, E.R. Baek, S.S. Chang and J.H. Kim, Fabrication of porous material for micro component application by direct X-ray lithography and sintering, Microelectron. Eng., 98 (2012) 297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. U. Phromsuwan, C. Sirisathitkul, Y. Sirisathitkul and C. Sriphung, Implementation of edge detection algorithms to characterize magnetic micropillars patterned by X-ray lithography, Int. J. Phys. Sci., 7 (2012) 1959–1963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Arai, M. Ando, S. Kanameishi and S. Yokozeki, Micro 3D measurement method using SEM, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 26 (2011) 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Industry/University Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC) in HDD Component, the Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University and National Electronics and Computer Technology Center, National Science and Technology Development Agency with the approval of Seagate Technology (Thailand). The authors would like to thank C. Sriphung for the assistance in the sample preparation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chitnarong Sirisathitkul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phromsuwan, U., Sirisathitkul, Y., Sirisathitkul, C. et al. Quantitative Analysis of X-ray Lithographic Pores by SEM Image Processing. MAPAN 28, 327–333 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-013-0089-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-013-0089-2

Keywords

Navigation