Abstract
In India, secrecy and stigma are associated with infertility and adoption choice. This paper presents the findings of a phenomenological study which examined psychological (emotional) and socio-cultural experiences of seven Indian adoptive parents through the retrospective accounts of their pre-adoption phase. This phase analyzed the coping of childless couples with a diagnosis of primary/secondary infertility while undergoing various assisted reproductive techniques for several years and then opting for adoption. Amidst the deep-seated socio-cultural belief in pronatalism, a non-kinship domestic adoption process was followed as an alternative to biological parenthood. An interpretative phenomenological analysis highlighted the pertinent themes related to gender differences in grief resolution, surrogacy vs. adoption option, belief in theory of ‘karma’ (destiny), perception of body image and role of women in adoption initiation. The themes are further supported by the views of Indian adoption social workers and the medical professionals, to have the holistic framework of the psychological journey of pre-adoptive couples. These findings would be particularly relevant not only for researchers in South Asian/Southeast Asian countries where the area of infertility and adoption is under-researched but also for those studying the emotional voyage of childless couples to attain adoptive parenthood in other cultural contexts. The paper recommends the interventions required at the level of government, community, adoption agencies and therapeutic services.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Complete data and material is available to support transparency.
Notes
Sama-Resource Group for Women and Health is an India based women's group working on women issues.
especially health (http://www.samawomenshealth.in/).
Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) https://tiss.edu/view/6/research/institutional-review-board/
References
Antonucci, T. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support, and sense of control. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 427–453). Academic Press.
Bachrach, C. A., London, K. A., & Maza, P. L. (1991). On the path to adoption: Adoption seeking in the United States, 1988. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(3), 705–718.
Baltimore, D. L., & Crase, S. J. (2009). A phenomenological exploration of adoption. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 3(2), 69–78.
Bartholet, E. (1993). Family bonds: Adoption and the politics of parenting. Houghton Mifflin.
Becker, G., & Nachtigall, R. D. (1994). ‘Born to be a mother’: The cultural construction of risk in infertility treatment in the US. Social Science Medicine, 39(4), 507–518.
Bernardi, L., Mynarska, M., & Rossier, C. (2015). Uncertain, changing and situated fertility intentions: A qualitative analysis. In D. Philipov, A. C. Liefbroer, & J. E. Klobas (Eds.), Reproductive Decision-Making in a Macro-micro Environment (pp. 113–139). Springer.
Bharadwaj, A. (2003). Why adoption is not an option in India: the visibility of infertility, the secrecy of donor insemination, and other cultural complexities. Social Science Medicine, 56(9), 1867–1880.
Bhargava, V. (2005). Adoption in India: Policies and experiences. Sage.
Bhaskar, S. (2017). Childlessness, Parenthood and Psychological Wellbeing. Recent Advances in Psychology, 4(2), 42–51.
Bhattacharya, S. (1990). ‘Motherhood in Ancient India’, Review of Women Studies, Economic and Political Weekly, 25(42-43), p. 50. Retrieved February 22nd 2022 from https://www.epw.in/journal/1990/42-43/review-womens-studies-review-issues-specials/motherhood-ancient-india.html
Bordo, S. (2002). All of us are real: Old images in a new world of adoption. Tulsa Studies in Women’s Literature, 21(2), 319–331.
Brodzinsky, D. M. (1987). Adjustment to adoption: A psychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 7, 25–47.
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181.
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., Chowdhury, R. G., Datta, A., & Bishista, B. (2019). Infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve have more live births following dehydroepiandrosterone pre-treatment. J Reprod Med Gynecol Obstet, 4, 020.
D’cruz, P., & Bharat, S. (2001). Beyond joint and nuclear: The Indian family revisited. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(2), 167–194.
De Wispelaere, J., & Weinstock, D. (2014). State regulation and assisted reproduction: Balancing the interests of parents and children. In F. Baylis & C. Mcleod (Eds.), Family- Making: Contemporary Ethical Challenges (pp. 131–150). Oxford University Press.
Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Stanton, A. L. (1991). Psychological Adjustment to Infertility. In A. L. Stanton & C. Dunkel-Schetter (Eds.), Infertility: Perspectives from stress and coping research (pp. 197–222). Boston, MA: Springer.
Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. Norton.
Flick, U., Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2004). A Companion to Qualitative Research. Sage.
Gangopadhyay, J., & Mathur, K. (2021). Examining lived experiences of infertility and perceptions toward the adoption of children in Urban India. Adoption Quarterly, 24(3), 229–249.
Ganguly, S., & Unisa, S. (2010). Trends of infertility and childlessness in India: Findings from NFHS Data. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 2(2), 131–138.
Gumus, G., & Lee, J. (2012). Alternative paths to parenthood: IVF or child adoption? Economic Inquiry, 50(3), 802–820.
Gurunath, S., Pandian, Z., Anderson, R. A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Defining infertility—a systematic review of prevalence studies. Human Reproduction Update, 17(5), 575–588.
Gururaj, M. S., Shilpa, S., & Maheshwaran, R. (2015). Revised socio-economic status scale for urban and rural India-revision for 2015 Socioeconomic. Scientific J Theory Practice Socio-Economic Development, 4(7), 167–174.
Hoksbergen, R. A. (1997). Child adoption: A guidebook for adoptive parents and their advisers. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
Indian Ministry of Law and Justice. (2015). Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act 2015. Retrieved January 20th, 2021 from http://cara.nic.in/pdf/jj%20act%202015.pdf
Jisha, P. R., & Thomas, I. (2016). Quality of life and infertility: Influence of gender, years of marital life, resilience, and anxiety. Psychological Studies, 61(3), 159–169.
Kirk, H. D. (1964). Shared fate: Theory of adoption and mental health. Free Press.
Kroger, J. (2000). Identity Development: Adolescence through Adulthood. Sage Pub Inc.
Kübler-Ross, E., & Kessler, D. (2005). On grief and grieving: Finding the meaning of grief through the five stages of loss. Scribner.
Kumar, N., & Singh, A. K. (2015). Trends of male factor infertility, an important cause of infertility: A review of literature. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 8(4), 191–196.
Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120.
Luster, T., & Ogakaki, L. (1993). Parenting: An Ecological Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
MacDonald, M. (2016). Parenthood and Open Adoption. Palgrave Macmillan.
Mahlstedt, P. P. (1985). The psychological component of infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 43, 335–346.
Malm, K., & Welti, K. (2010). Exploring motivations to adopt. Adoption Quarterly, 13(3–4), 185–208.
Mehta, B., & Kapadia, S. (2008). Experiences of childlessness in an Indian context: A Gender perspective. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(3), 437–460.
Mehta, N. (1992). Ours by Choice: Parenting Through Adoption. Rite-Print-Pak.
Miall, C. E., & March, K. (2003). A comparison of biological and adoptive mothers and fathers: The relevance of biological kinship and gendered constructs of parenthood. Adoption Quarterly, 6(4), 7–39.
Mitra, S., Konantambigi, R., & Datta, V. (2018). A literature review of non-family domestic adoptions in India: Lessons from other countries. Indian Journal of Social Work, 79(4), 415–436.
Mitra, S., & O’Brien, V. (2021). Navigating methodological concerns at the data collection stage: Lessons from a qualitative Irish Indian adoption study. Qualitative Report, 26(8), 2521–2537.
Mohanty, J. (2014). Attitudes toward adoption in Singapore. Journal of Family Issues, 35(5), 705–728.
Mohanty, J., Ahn, J., & Chokkanathan, S. (2017). Adoption disclosure: Experiences of Indian domestic adoptive parents: Adoption disclosure. Child & Family Social Work, 22(S1), 1–11.
Momin, E. (2008). Sociology of Adoption. Rawat Publications.
Neugarten, B. (1978). Time, age and the life cycle. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136(7), 887–894. Reprinted in D. A. Neurgarten (Ed.) (1996). The Meanings of age: selected papers of Bernice L Neurgarten. Chicago: The University of Czhicago Press
Onayemi, O. M. (2019). From humanitarianism to family building: Genres of security implications of child adoption as a management strategy for infertility. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 39(3/4), 264–275.
Palacios, J., & Sanchez-Sandoval, Y. (2005). Beyond adopted/nonadopted comparisons. In D. M. Brodzinsky & J. Palacios (Eds.), Psychological Issues in Adoption: Research and Practice (pp. 115–142). Praeger.
Park, N. K., & Wonch Hill, P. (2014). Is adoption an option? The role of importance of motherhood and fertility help-seeking in considering adoption. Journal of Family Issues, 35(5), 601–626.
Patel, T. (1994). Fertility behavior: Population and society in a Rajasthan village. Oxford University Press.
Peck, E., & Senderowitz, J. (1974). The myth of mom and apple pie. Crowell.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomenological research methods. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology: Exploring the breadth of human experience (pp. 41–60). Plenum Press.
Ponterotto, J. G., & Grieger, I. (2007). Effectively communicating qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(3), 404–430.
Pujari, S., & Unisa, S. (2014). Failing fatherhood: A study of childless men in rural Andhra Pradesh. Sociological Bulletin, 63(1), 21–40.
Riessman, C. K. (2000). Stigma and everyday resistance practices: Childless women in south India. Gender & Society, 14(1), 111–135.
SAMA Team (2007). Assisted reproductive technologies in India: Implications for women. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(3), (Jun. 9–15), 2184–2189. Retrieved January 25th, 2019 from https://www.epw.in/journal/2007/23/special-articles/assisted-reproductive-technologies-india-implications-women.html
Sandlow, J. I. (2000). Shattering the myths about male infertility. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 107, 235–239.
Seshadri, A. (1990). A Study of Perceptions of Childless Couples regarding Childlessness, treatment and Adoption. Master of Arts thesis in Social Work. Submitted to Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai. Identification number. 076650
Shrivastava, S. R., Shrivastava, P. S., & Ramasamy, J. (2015). Mainstreaming of Ayurveda, Yoga, Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homeopathy with the health care delivery system in India. Journal of Traditional and Complementary Medicine, 5(2), 116–118.
Singh, A. J., & Dhaliwal, L. K. (1993). Identification of infertile couples in a rural area of northern India. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 98, 206–208.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 53–80). Sage.
Smith, J. A., Harré, R., & Van Langenhove, L. (1995). Idiography and the case study. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking Psychology (pp. 59–59). Sage.
Staniec, J. F. O., & Webb, N. J. (2007). Utilization of infertility services: How much does money matter? Health Services Research, 42(3), 971–989.
Thenmozhi, S., Bhaskar, S., & KavithaGautham, K. S. (2018). Stress and depression during assisted reproductive technology treatment - infertility counselling. Int J Reprod Med Gynecol, 4(2), 028–033.
Timm, T. M., Mooradian, J. K., & Hock, R. M. (2011). Exploring core issues in adoption: Individual and marital experience of adoptive mothers. Adoption Quarterly, 14(4), 268–283.
Unisa, S. (2001). Sequence of fertility treatments among childless couples in Ranga Reddy District, Andhra Pradesh. India. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 16(2), 161–176.
Widge, A. (2005). Seeking conception: Experiences of urban Indian women with in vitro fertilisation. Patient Education and Counseling, 59(3), 226–233.
Willing, I., & Froneck, P. (2014). Constructing Identities and Issues of Race in Transnationaladoption: The Experiences of Adoptive Parents. British Journal of Social Work, 44(5), 1129–1146.
Charlesworth, L. (2004). The Couple's guide to in vitro fertilization: Everything you need to know to maximize your chances of success. USA: Da Capo Lifelong Books
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SM collected the data and conducted the analysis. Prof. RMK supervised the findings of this work. SM wrote the manuscript. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SM and Professor MGS critically evaluated it. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Consent to Participate
All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and their written consent was taken for audio recording the interviews.
Consent for Publication
All the authors have consented to submit the article for publication.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mitra, S., Konantambigi, R. & Datta, V. Infertility, Loss and Adoption: An Indian Experience. Psychol Stud 68, 434–446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-023-00738-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-023-00738-2