Reconsidering the Process of Informed Consent in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Experiences and Implications for Practice

Abstract

A patient’s conscious decision to voluntarily undergo a therapeutic treatment is called informed consent (IC). The aim of IC is to provide information about health and treatment options and increase patient’s participation in healthcare decision-making. IC therefore honors the ethical principles of human autonomy and self-determination. In the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART), the process of communication and mutual understanding between patient and doctor (the IC process) is a current and relevant issue due to its medical, ethical and psychological implications. This exploratory research aims to understand how couples with infertility problems relate to the ART IC, and it proposes the innovative experience of IC conversations with a psychologist. It also provides practical advice on a better use of IC process in ART centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Amin, M. F., Jawaid, M., Shafiq-ur-Rehman, Mudassir, H., & Zakai, S. B. (2006). An audit of information provided during preoperative informed consent. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences,22(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, M., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (2013). Doing narrative research (2nd ed.). London, England: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Berman, L., Curry, L., Gusberg, R., Dardik, A., & Fraenkel, L. (2008). Informed consent for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: The patient’s perspective. Journal of Vascular Surgery,48(2), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bluestein, D., & Cubic, B. A. (2009). Psychologists and primary care physicians: A training model for creating collaborative relationships. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings,16(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-009-9156-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bretz, R., & Schmidbauer, M. (1983). Media for interactive communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research,71(3), 691–710.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bryman, A. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative research: Further reflections on their integration. In J. Brannen (Ed.), Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57–81). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burns, P., Keogh, I., & Timon, C. (2005). Informed consent: A patient’s perspective. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology,119(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1258/0022215053222860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Busquets, M., & Caïs, J. (2017). Informed consent: A study of patients with life-threatening illnesses. Nursing Ethics,24(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733015614880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cawich, S. O., Barnett, A. T., Crandon, I. W., Drew, S. D., & Gordon-Strachan, G. (2013). From the patient’s perspective: Is there a need to improve the quality of informed consent for surgery in training hospitals? The Permanente Journal,17(4), 22–26. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/13-032.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordella, B., Greco, F., Di Trani, M., Renzi, A., La Corte, C., & Solano, L. (2016). The impact of joint consultation with family physicians on perception of psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice,47(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/pro0000064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cordella, B., Greco, F., & Renzi, A. (2017). L’infertilità tra individuo e cultura. Le parole per dirlo [Infertility between the individual and the culture. The words to say it]. In M. Di Trani & A. La Mesa (Eds.), In-fertilità: Un approccio multidisciplinare [In-fertility: A multidisciplinary approach] (pp. 87–102). Rome, Italy: Sapienza University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., et al. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine,27(10), 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ernstmann, N., Weissbach, L., Herden, J., Winter, N., & Ansmann, L. (2017). Patient–physician communication and health-related quality of life of patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy—A longitudinal multilevel analysis. BJU International,119(3), 396–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Flory, J., & Emanuel, E. (2004). Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Medical Association,292(13), 1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fritzsche, K., Schweickhardt, A., Frahm, G., Monsalve, S. D., Zanjani, H. A., & Goli, F. (2014). Doctor–patient communication. In K. Fritzsche, S. H. McDaniel, & M. Wirsching (Eds.), Psychosomatic medicine: An international primer for the primary care setting (pp. 33–49). New York, USA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Galhardo, A., Cunha, M., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Matos, M. (2013). The mediator role of emotion regulation processes on infertility-related stress. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings,20(4), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-013-9370-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giunta, F. (2001). Il consenso informato all’atto medico tra principi costituzionali e implicazioni penalistiche [The informed consent to the medical act between constitutional principles and criminal implications]. Rivista Italiana Diritto Processuale Penale,2(1), 377–410.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hariharan, M., Rao, C. R., Rana, S., & Swain, S. (2015). Similarity index: A new approach to measuring doctor–patient communication. Psychological Studies,60(4), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0340-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hilbert, J., & Yaggi, H. K. (2018). Patient-centered care in obstructive sleep apnea: A vision for the future. Sleep Medicine Reviews,37(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2017.02.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, S., & Street, R. L. (2018). The effects of patient-centered communication, social capital, and internet use on patient empowerment: A cross-sectional study in China. Global Health Promotion. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975917749197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jisha, P. R., & Thomas, I. (2016). Quality of life and infertility: Influence of gender, years of marital life, resilience, and anxiety. Psychological Studies,61(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-016-0358-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Köhler, A. K., Tingström, P., Jaarsma, T., & Nilsson, S. (2018). Patient empowerment and general self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease: A cross-sectional study. BMC Family Practice,19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0749-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Koyfman, S. A., Reddy, C. A., Hizlan, S., Leek, A. C., & Kodish, A. E. (2016). Informed consent conversations and documents: A quantitative comparison. Cancer,122(3), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Krumholz, H. M. (2010). Informed consent to promote patient-centred care. Journal of American Medical Association,303(12), 1190–1191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Madeira, J. L., Coyne, K., Jaeger, A. S., Parry, J. P., & Lindheim, S. R. (2017a). Inform and consent: More than just ‘‘sign here’’. Fertility and Sterility,108(1), 40–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Madeira, J. L., Coyne, K., Jaeger, A. S., Parry, J. P., & Lindheim, S. R. (2017b). Inform and consent to ivf: More than just sign here. Fertility and Sterility,108(3), 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Practice Committee, A. S. R. M. (2014). Revised minimum standards for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility,102(3), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ratner, N. L., Davis, E. B., Lhotka, L. L., Wille, S. M., & Walls, M. L. (2017). Patient-centered care, diabetes empowerment, and type 2 diabetes medication adherence among American Indian patients. Clinical Diabetes,35(5), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd17-0008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Skillern, A. A., Cedars, M. I., & Huddleston, H. G. (2014). Oocyte donors’ comprehension as assessed by the EDICT (Egg Donor Informed Consent Tool). Fertility and Sterility,101(1), 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solano, L., Pirrotta, E., Ingravalle, V., & Fayella, P. (2009). The family physician and the psychologist in the office together: A response to fragmentation. Mental Health in Family Medicine,6(2), 91–98.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Swain, S., Hariharan, M., Rana, S., Chivukula, U., & Thomas, M. (2015). Doctor–patient communication: Impact on adherence and prognosis among patients with primary hypertension. Psychological Studies,60(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-014-0291-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vergallo, G. M. (2008). Il rapporto medico-paziente. Consenso e informazione tra libertà e responsabilità [The doctor–patient relationship. Consent and information between freedom and responsibility]. Milan, Italy: Giuffrè Ed.

  35. Zick, S. M., Czuhajewski, C., Fouladbakhsh, J. M., Greenlee, H., Harris, R. E., Henry, N. L., et al. (2018). Integrative oncology scholars program: A model for integrative oncology education. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine,24(9–10), 1018–1022. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2018.0184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiola Fedele.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fedele, F., Cordella, B. & Langher, V. Reconsidering the Process of Informed Consent in Assisted Reproductive Technology: Experiences and Implications for Practice. Psychol Stud 65, 191–198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-019-00542-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Assisted reproductive technology
  • Informed consent
  • Practical suggestions