Advertisement

Psychological Studies

, Volume 63, Issue 3, pp 236–242 | Cite as

The Moderating Role of General Mood Between Agreeableness and Moral Maturity

  • Müge Ersoy-Kart
  • İlkay Savcı
  • Metin Pişkin
  • Özgür Güldü
  • Merve Totuk
Review Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the moderating role of general mood on the relationship between moral maturity and agreeableness. In the present study, total of 150 administrative and academic staff (70 females and 80 males) were surveyed from the Turkish universities. Data were collected on the Big Five Personality Scale, The Scale of Moral Maturity and Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory. The relationship between moral maturity and agreeableness personality was found to be moderated by the general mood of employees.

Keywords

Moral maturity Big five Agreeableness Emotional intelligence General mood 

References

  1. Acar, F. T. (2001). Duygusal Zekâ Yeteneklerinin Göreve ve İnsana Yönelik Liderlik Davranışları ile İlişkisi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Athota, V. S., O’Connor, P. J., & Jackson, C. (2009). The role of emotional intelligence and personality in moral reasoning. In R. E. Hicks (Ed.), Personality and individual differences: Current directions. Bowen Hills, QLD: Australian Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Attia, N. (2013). Big five personality factors and individual performance (unpublished master’s thesis). Quebec City: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
  5. Balat, G. U. (2005). Değerler Eğitimi ve Değerler Eğitimi Programları. İstanbul: Morpa Kültür Yayınları.Google Scholar
  6. Bar-On, R. (2007). The Bar-On model of emotional intelligence: A valid, robust and applicable EI model. Organisations and People, 14(2), 27–34.Google Scholar
  7. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, A. K. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1–2), 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Basım, H. N., Çetin, E., & Tabak, A. (2009). Beş Faktör Kişilik Özelliklerinin Kişilerarası Çatışma Çözme Yaklaşımlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 24(63), 20–34.Google Scholar
  10. Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait–multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 729–750.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, P. T., & McCrea, R. R. (1992). Revised Neo Personality Inventory (Neo Pi-R) and Neo Five-Factor Inventory (Neo-Five). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis, J., Billingslea, R., & Wilson, J. (1988). Personality correlates of moral reasoning and attitudes toward authority. Psychological Reports, 63(3), 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day, D. V., & Schleicher, D. J. (2006). Self-monitoring at work: A motive-based perspective. Journal of Personality, 74(39), 685–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Deniz, S. (2013). The relationship between emotional intelligence and problem solving in prospective teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(24), 2339–2345.Google Scholar
  16. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ersoy, M. N. (1997). Adalet Alanında Çalışan ve Bu Konuda Eğitim Görenlerin Ahlaki Gelişim Evrelerinin İncelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  18. Güldü, Ö. (2014). Kadın Çalışanların Yaşam Doyumu, Duygusal Zekâ ve Ahlaki Olgunluk Düzeylerinin Üretim Karşıtı İş Davranışlarına Etkisi. Kastamonu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2), 48–64.Google Scholar
  19. Gürman Kahraman, F. (2013). The effect of socio-affective language learning strategies and emotional intelligence training on english as a foreign language (EFL) learners foreign language anxiety in speaking classes (unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara: Bilkent University.Google Scholar
  20. Hartoğlu, Z. (2015). A case study on an integration of five domains of emotional intelligence in English language teaching (unpublished master’s thesis). Mersin: Çağ University.Google Scholar
  21. Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41(3), 924–936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hogan, R. (1973). Moral conduct and moral character: A psychological perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 79(4), 217–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kart, M. E. (2004). Pozitif Yanılsama ve Psikolojik Sağlık. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 59(4), 173–194.Google Scholar
  24. Kaur, T., & Chadha, N. (2016). Psychological aspects of pollyanna attitude. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 12–16.Google Scholar
  25. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  26. Liddell, D. L., & Cooper, D. L. (2012). Moral development in higher education. New Direction for Student Services, 139, 5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu, Y., West, S. G., Levy, R., & Aiken, L. S. (2017). Tests of simple slopes in multiple regression models with an interaction: Comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(4), 445–464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Measurement invariance of big-five factors over the life span: ESEM tests of gender, age, plasticity, maturity, and la dolce Vita effects. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1194–1218.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mathieson, K. (2003). Elements of moral maturity. Journal of College and Character, 4(5), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Petrides, K. V., Siegling, A. B., & Saklofske, D. H. (2016). Theory and measurement of trait emotional intelligence. In U. Kumar (Ed.), The Wiley handbook of personality assessment (pp. 90–103). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rest, J., & Narvaez, D. (1991). The college experience and moral development. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development, vol. 1. theory; vol. 2. research; vol. 3. application (pp. 229–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Şengün, M., & Kaya, M. (2007). Ahlaki Olgunluk Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 24–25, 51–64.Google Scholar
  35. Sümer, N., Lajunen, T., & Özkan, T. (2005). Big five personality traits as the distal predictors of road accident involvement. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Traffic and transport psychology: Theory and application (pp. 215–227). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  36. Van der Linden, D., Tsaousis, I., & Petrides, K. V. (2012). Overlap between general factors of personality in the big five, giant three, and trait emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Villegas de Posada, C., & Vargas-Trujillo, E. (2015). Moral reasoning and personal behavior: A meta-analytical review. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 408–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wright, J. D. (2015). An examination of the effects of moral maturity, propensity for moral disengagement, entitlement perceptions and anomia on fraud behavior (unpublished dissertation’s thesis). Chicago: The Chicago School of Professional Psychology.Google Scholar
  39. Yüksel, M. (2006). Duygusal Zekâ ve Performans İlişkisi (Bir Uygulama) (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  40. Zhang, L., Cao, T., & Wang, Y. (2018). The mediation role of leadership styles in integrated project collaboration: An emotional intelligence perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Political SciencesAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Educational SciencesAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Beypazarı Vocational SchoolAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.Center for the Study of HRM and Career CounselingAnkara UniversityAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations