Machiavellianism, Influential Tactics and Well-being Among Indian College Students
The present paper aimed to explore Machiavellianism, soft and hard influential tactics and subjective as well as psychological well-being (PWB) among final-year students of professional courses from New Delhi, India. The relationship between Machs and well-being was explored directly as well as indirectly through soft and hard influential tactics. Mach IV was used to assess Machiavellianism. Influential tactics were assessed with the use of a scale, developed for the current research, which is based on Dubrin conceptualization. Life satisfaction was assessed with the help of Students Life Satisfaction Scale by Huebner, whereas the positive and negative affect were measured by PANAS. PWB was assessed by Ryff’s 18-item scale. All the tools had satisfactory reliability values. The average score of Mach showed average level of Machiavellianism among the participants who used both soft and hard tactics. There was positive correlation between Machiavellianism and positive affect, whereas negative correlations were reported with negative affect, life satisfaction and PWB. Both soft and hard tactics mediated the relationship between Machiavellianism and well-being. The study has contributed in the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the importance of hard influential tactics, the relationship with PWB and the indirect paths through which Machiavellianism influences well-being.
KeywordsMachiavellianism Influence tactics Well-being Indirect effect Hard tactics Soft tactics
- Akhtar, S., & Mahmood, Z. (2009). A Tri-prong variable analysis of influence strategies. Journal of World Applied Sciences, 7, 1080–1089.Google Scholar
- Bar-On, R. (2005). The impact of emotional intelligence on subjective well-being. Perspectives in Education, 23, 41–61.Google Scholar
- Baumgardner, S., & Crothers, M. (2009). Positive psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Bharti, A. (1985). The self in Hindu thought and action. In A. Marsella, G. DeVos, & F. L. K. Hsu (Eds.), Culture and self (pp. 185–230). New York: Tavistock Publication.Google Scholar
- Castro, S. L., Douglas, C., Hochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., & Frink, D. D. (2003). The effects-of positive affect and gender on the influence tactics—Job performance relationship. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190301000101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970a). Studies in Machiavellianism. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970b). How devious are you? Take the Machiavelli test to find out. Journal of Management in Engineering, 15, 17.Google Scholar
- Commonwealth Games Scam. (2010). Retrieved 25 August 2015, from http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/major-scam-hits-commonwealth-games/article542593.ece.
- Corts, I. M., Jaca, L. M., & Díaz, F. J. M. (2009). Effectiveness of influence patterns. Psychology in Spain, 13, 33–39.Google Scholar
- Dahling, J. J., Kuyumcu, D., & Librizzi, E. H. (2014). Machiavellianism, unethical behavior, and well-being in organizational life. In R. A. Giacalone & M. D. Promislo (Eds.), Handbook of unethical work behavior: implications for individual well-being: Implications for individual well-being. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fehr, B., Samsom, D., & Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty years later. In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 77–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
- Field, A. P. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Gable, M., & Topol, M. (1988). Machiavellianism and the department store executive. Journal of Retailing, 64, 68–84.Google Scholar
- Hawley, P. H. (2006). Evolution and personality: A new look at Machiavellianism. In D. Mroczek & T. Little (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 147–161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
- Hyla, M. (2012). Machiavellianism, relationship satisfaction, and the use of influence tactics in a close relationship. 1st ed. [ebook] International Masaryk Conference, pp. 2764–2773. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Magdalena_Hyla/publication/275968630_Machiavellianism_relationship_satisfaction_and_the_use_of_influence_tactics_in_a_close_relationship/links/554cae160cf29752ee7f3540/Machiavellianism-relationship-satisfaction-and-the-use-of-influence-tactics-in-a-close-relationship.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2017.
- Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Teicher, E. A. (2010). Who is James Bond?: The dark triad as an agentic social style. Individual Differences Research, 8, 111–120.Google Scholar
- Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2010). Differentiating the Dark Triad within the interpersonal circumplex. In Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 249–267). Wiley-Blackwell. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001868.ch15.
- Kline, R. B. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Lenzner, R. (2008). Bernie Madoff’s $50 Billion Ponzi Scheme. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2008/12/12/madoff-ponzi-hedge-pf-ii-in_rl_1212croesus_inl.html.
- Liew, L. L. (2003). Downward influence tactics: The impact of positive/negative affect, leader-member exchange, and gender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Penang: University Science Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Mandal, E. (2008). Miłość, władza i manipulacja w bliskich związkach. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
- Omar, F. (2001). Downward influence tactics, leader-member exchange, and job attitudes. Unpublished MBA thesis. Penang: University Science Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Rehman, U., Shahnawaz, M., & Imran, M. (2017). Machiavellianism and task oriented leadership: Testing job autonomy as a trait activator. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi (Turkish Journal of Psychology), 32, 24–30. Retrieved from http://www.turkpsikolojidergisi.org/ojs-2.4.6/index.php/tpd/article/view/177.
- Satyam Scam Case. (2009). Retrieved 25 August 2015, from http://cbi.nic.in/fromarchives/satyam/satyam.php.
- Verma, P. K. (2004). Being Indian: The truth about why the twenty-first century will be India’s. New Delhi: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
- Wertag, A., & Hanzec, I. (2013). Life satisfaction and gender differences in Dark Triad personality traits. Poster presentation at the NAUČNO-STRUČNI SKUP SAVREMENI TRENDOVI U PSIHOLOGIJI FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET, NOVI SAD.Google Scholar
- Zajenkowski, M., & Czarna, A. Z. (2015). What makes narcissists unhappy? Subjectively assessed intelligence moderates the relationship between narcissism and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar