Advertisement

Psychological Studies

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 25–31 | Cite as

Role of Space Qualities of Urban Parks on Mood Change

  • Mahdieh Pazhouhanfar
Research in Progress
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

Current literature shows an adequate evidence of the importance of urban parks on people health, especially to reduce stress. Nevertheless, space quality must be considered. This research presents people’s perception of the relationship between space quality of urban park and mood state after visiting urban parks. A questionnaire survey gleaned opinion from visitors in three popular urban parks in Gorgan city. Study showed that three variables of space qualities including “fresh air”, “tree and greening” and “flower” positively predicted mood state. The finding of this study also showed that attitudes towards “tree and greening” and “flower” were different. “Flower” was found as the most influential space quality to explain the mood state for women, while “tree and greening” was profound among men. The use of flowers is suggested as a means of making urban parks more relaxing and pleasant for women. The importance of green areas inclusive of trees and flowers should be considered for future urban planning. This insight also provides a strong reason for collaboration between health professionals and city planners.

Keywords

Flower Green space Gender Psychology Stress 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Golestan University through a research grant (Project No: 93/71/19417).

References

  1. Abkar, M., Kamal, M. S. M., Mariapan, M., Maulan, S., Sheybani, M., & Beheshti, S. (2010). The role of urban green spaces in mood change. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 4(10), 5352–5361.Google Scholar
  2. Annerstedt, M., Norman, J., Boman, M., Mattsson, L., Grahn, P., & Wahrborg, P. (2010). Finding stress relief in a forest. Ecological Bulletin, 53, 33–44.Google Scholar
  3. Barton, J., Griffin, M., & Pretty, J. (2012). Exercise-, nature-and socially interactive-based initiatives improve mood and self-esteem in the clinical population. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(2), 89–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean, J., van Dooren, K., & Weinstein, P. (2011). Does biodiversity improve mental health in urban settings? Medical Hypotheses, 76(6), 877–880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Depledge, M., Stone, R., & Bird, W. J. (2011). Can natural and virtual environments be used to promote improved human health and wellbeing? Environmental Science and Technology, 45(11), 4660–4665.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujiwara, N., & Tashiro, Y. (1984). A study on desirable form of roadside planting. Journal of the Japanese Institute of Landscape Architects, 47(5), 263–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guguen, N. (2011). Say it with flowers: Effect of flowers in a room on female’s receptivity of a male’s courtship request. Social Influence, 6(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haviland-Jones, J., Rosario, H. H., Wilson, P., & McGuire, T. R. (2005). An environmental approach to positive emotion: Flowers. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 104–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Haybron, D. M. (2011). Central Park: Nature, context, and human wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herzog, T. R. (1985). A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5(3), 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Irvine, K. N., Warber, S. L., Devine-Wright, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Understanding urban green space as a health resource: A qualitative comparison of visit motivation and derived effects among park users in Sheffield, UK. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(1), 417–442.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaplan, R. (2007). Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: The wild and the tame. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82(1), 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Karmanov, D., & Hamel, R. (2008). Assessing the restorative potential of contemporary urban environment(s): Beyond the nature versus urban dichotomy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(2), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nielsen, N. R., Kristensen, T. S., Schnohr, P., & Grønbæk, M. (2008). Perceived stress and cause-specific mortality among men and women: Results from a prospective cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168(5), 481–491.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nielsen, T. S., & Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health and Place, 13(4), 839–850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nordh, H., Hartig, T., Hagerhall, C. M., & Fry, G. (2009). Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8(4), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Payne, L. L., Mowen, A. J., & Orsega-Smith, E. (2002). An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: The role of residential location, race, and age. Leisure Sciences, 24(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Regan, C. L., & Horn, S. A. (2005). To nature or not to nature: Associations between environmental preferences, mood states and demographic factors. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rostami, R., Lamit, H., Khoshnava, S. M., & Rostami, R. (2014). The role of historical Persian gardens on the health status of contemporary urban residents. EcoHealth, 11(3), 308–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Santagati, D. C. (2009). How Using the Shin-Ka Program in a Japanese-style Healing Garden Will Influence the Treatment of Adolescent Substance Abusers. Ann Arbor: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Stigsdotter, U. K., Ekholm, O., Schipperijn, J., Toftager, M., Kamper-Jorgensen, F., & Randrup, T. B. (2010). Health promoting outdoor environments-Associations between green space, and health, health-related quality of life and stress based on a Danish national representative survey. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 38(11), 411–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stigsdotter, U. K., & Grahn, P. (2003). Experiencing a garden: A healing garden for people suffering from burnout diseases. Journal of Therapeutic Horticulture, 14(5), 38–48.Google Scholar
  25. Stigsdotter, U. K., & Grahn, P. (2011). Stressed individuals’ preferences for activities and environmental characteristics in green spaces. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 10(4), 295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Todorova, A., Asakawa, S., & Aikoh, T. (2004). Preferences for and attitudes towards street flowers and trees in Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(4), 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13(5), 523–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and natural landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van den Berg, A. E., Koole, S. L., & van der Wulp, N. Y. (2003). Environmental preference and restoration: (How) are they related? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Velarde, M. D., Fry, G., & Tveit, M. (2007). Health effects of viewing landscapes—Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 6(4), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. White, M. P., Pahl, S., Ashbullby, K., Herbert, S., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 40–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. White, M., Smith, A., Humphryes, K., Pahl, S., Snelling, D., & Depledge, M. (2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yamane, K., Kawashima, M., Fujishige, N., & Yoshida, M. (2004, June). Effects of interior horticultural activities with potted plants on human physiological and emotional status. Paper presented at the International horticultural congress: Expanding roles for horticulture in improving human well-being and life quality, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Academy of Psychology (NAOP) India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Faculty of EngineeringGolestan UniversityGorganIran

Personalised recommendations